A valid personal opinion. But not a fact.
In my opinion, this is not a slow bleed. It is an overpressure valve used by individual Canadians and Americans to change their own circumstances, to the net benefit of both countries, as it provides options for individuals to choose. If an...
It is just a thing. Facts are not, in and of themselves, good or bad.
The fact that it is persistent suggests much deeper roots of some type, rather than the introduction of some new variable.
Exactly. Individual people make individual choices, and always have. If the flow has been, over the long term, relatively stable, then it would seem that the aggregate of those individual choices is not necessarily a commentary on the current political climate., much as one may hope.
Sarah Connor not seeing the research conducted prior to accepting an AI overview. It is a tool. Probably less biased than shouting podcasts with doomscroller titles...
Exactly. It is an different perspective on the same problem. I asked the question "why are Americans moving to Canada" and this is the answer I received
AI Overview
Americans move to Canada seeking increased social stability, safety, and a better work-life balance. They are primarily driven by progressive social policies, gun control, universal healthcare, and the desire for a calmer political climate, though many find the process difficult...
so you only really win any competition if you blank the opponent? A win is a win. And a loss is a loss. This was a big loss.
The key now is whether he is able to pass the SAVE act, because if he does the US system of government will change dramatically, and not for the better.
Perhaps we should also be testing the productivity and willingnness to work of those that are born in Canada.
As an immigrant myself, I am very aware of the amount of courage and initiative it takes to move to another country in search of a better life. On the face of it, that requires a much...
I have watched the file go from RCAF, to CA, to CJOC, to ADM IM, to CCSI. I was involved in one way or another with everything after RCAF. I would like to assume that now it is with JFC now..
A few years ago I worked at the newly formed Supply Ontario, as the lead for their Digital Strategy. Like many Canadian jurisdictions and companies, they voluntarily abided by the US standard, much as the CAF acknowledged Leahy Vetting in Iraq and elsewhere
UK emphasize JEMSO...we kick it around from OPI to OPI without mandate, direction, or resources.
In the original published PFEC, information was a domain rather than an environment. I would prefer that had remained the case
I'm not so sure about a purge. She definitely was on the right track and she and I agreed on so much. There are others in in the senior levels of the CAF who also share some of her views.
In my experience, Policy people in the PS (and often academia) have a tendency to be quite staid in their...
Despite the narrative that is developed over the last 3 to 4 years, if not longer in the Canadian armed forces, things may not be as they seem. Another way to say that is that the opposite of toxic masculinity is not enlightened femininity. It is in fact toxic femininity
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.