Search results

Curiouser and curiouser... There is an article in the Globe that may be of interest regarding this topic.

Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war, With the cross of Jesus going on before! Christ, the royal Master, leads against the foe; Forward into battle, see his banner go!

That's been my question from the outset.

I distinctly remember being told "information security is everybody's job" and "if something doesn't look right, report it". I guess times have changed.

If even 1/10 of that is true and provable at trial, he could be seriously FUBAR.

The reprimand appears to be an RW and not a reprimand in the sense of a CSD punishment.

A perception that may have a 2026 expiry date, but certainly has a 2028 one. Time is more on our side than his.

Of course it's always about him. 🤦‍♂️

Potentially. Foreign entities can logically include both adversaries and allies.

I'm not sure that's the issue. The article states that he retained Mr Fowler to deal with the RW. I think part of the confusion is the use of the term "reprimand" to mean the RW. As we know, a reprimand is a formal punishment delivered at trial, where an RW is an administrative measure. I'm...

Maybe I'm missing something here. He hired a lawyer to deal with the RM? Wouldn't the only place a lawyer could appear in this instance be if a RoG subsequent to the RM wound up going to the Federal Court?

This 2025 data from the US Travel Association. Visitors from: Canada down 26% Western Europe down 17% Asia down 25% South America down 10% Aggregate 14% decline. Every 1% drop represents $1.8 billion in lost revenue. The US is now running an annual $50 Billion travel trade deficit. It should...

There should be correspondence from DMCA on the RM. If he was given an RW, I highly doubt "you know what you did" was the totality of the interview.

I think this case has already been mentioned here, but it appears to have come to its conclusion: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/singa-bui-disbarred-lawyer-real-estate-9.7014272

From what I saw earlier today, this one has no legs, despite her lawyer and Bannon saying it does. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue several times, contrary to her lawyer's assertion to the contrary. There is every possibility that the SC declines to hear the case. I anticipate...

It's going to take time. Sometimes weeks, sometimes months. It depends on the complexity of the case, and the existing workload.

These cases are usually quite complex and it is normal that they move slowly.

I read the original paper when it came out in 2021. One of a significant number of limitations is the immense amount of energy required to make it work. As a concept, interesting but not likely.

To quote Wayne Gretzky... you miss every shot you don't take. Follow the instructions and make your case. Yes, you might fail, but you will absolutely fail if you don't try.

My own thoughts on the subject: The America we have known—rooted in shared values, civic unity, and a belief in upward mobility—is lost forever, not through a single catastrophe, but through a slow erosion of trust, truth, and identity. Once bound by a common narrative of freedom and...