I don't have any current plans to join the military.
Listen, it is not my intention to personally insult you, which I can see I did from the get go.
And for that I am sorry.
Listen, you and others answered all the questions I wanted answered.
I like your blunt answers.
Just don't add in the little comments and remarks and I will be happy. No need to make things personnel.
Fine, I will leave it alone. I just don't understand the situation. I am trying to get a better understanding of it.
I just don't like being talk to as an idiot either.
And don't just accept something because that's the way it has always been, a new set of eyes can always add something to a...
Now you are insulting me?
I understood that when it was pointed out earlier and then you said in regards to a standard for the centrifuge, and I quote, "There IS. Did you not watch the show ? They gave him several chances to pass the centrifuge and he did not."
I am not second guessing, I said I respected the decision that was made.
I just want to know why there can't be some sort of standard put on the centrifuge.
I just think there should be a standard for pilots on the centrifuge. If someone of experience wants to give him another shot then so be it.
However, I do pay them to make the right decision, but they are also accountable to the taxpayer.
True enough, from what I saw he is a good pilot and does have seat time.
However, something like the centrifuge should not be looked at as a "hurdle" in my opinion (again for what that is worth).
To me, a hurdle is say learning to do a task in a specified time.
I mean the doctor they...
Yeah thanks for setting me straight.
Yeah, I understand now. I still take offense to the comment. I was looking for someone to set me straight on the issue.
Yes, millions of dollars have been spent, but what I am saying is they let him stay around at the squadron until he can attempt the...
I really take offense to this, because I don't play flight simulators.
I was looking to come from the viewpoint of a taxpayer. You have to understand that the way I see it, is that at some point, somebody has the tough job of saying, yeah time to cut our losses.
What I am trying to get out of...
I agree.
I mean maybe it is just the producers trying to make the show more interesting, but some of the mistakes she has made seem to be extremely bad. Like as in why is she still there?
I am paraphrasing, but they did say something on the show to the affect of she almost killed 3 people. ...
Doesn't seem to be much action in here so thought I would give a hint,
First off there was only 2 prototypes built, and neither say action in World War One as they were developed a little too late.
I thought I seen this already posted in here but I guess not. This thing has a ton of cost overruns and has not performed anywhere near what it was suppose to. I can't seem to find any consistent stats on performance at all.
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003265.html
It is more of an assumption based on the fact the government in all their wisdom will almost ulitimately go for the less expensive F-35A version for land based operations. But you are right in what you say, I just personally don't think Canada will buy any STOVL unless we have a STOVL carrier...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.