Search results

Is this even remotely true? Maritime cooperation could draw on Japan's icebreaker construction expertise, developed through vessels such as the Antarctic research ship Shirase,

BS, the new name should be BS.

I think that longer lifespans is another factor. In 1976, being 65yrs old was pretty old - the decades of drinking, smoking, poor eating and such took a pretty heavy toll on the body. Fast forward to 2026 and today’s 65yr old may drink lightly, have never smoked or been around second hand smoke...

Rubino sure has been quiet and out of the spotlight lately.

It’s a fair hypothesis that all this Trump led chaos ends Jan 2029, but in the end it’s still a hypothesis.

Maybe they are looking g for a new best friend or two?

Question - if the US left NATO would this nullify this treaty with Denmark?

But because NATO get them all except Eurocorps?

I would say then, Why did the UK create JEF then?

JEF sounds like something we’d want to be involved with. Greenland - Iceland - UK - Norway waterways.

What’s bluster?

So no NATO, no JEF?

Not surprising about the ‘terms were empty’ as those meeting occur next month in October. aS for the second part, not surprised.

With this news I can’t help but thinks of this song…. Clowns to the left of me Jokers to the right Here I am, stuck in the middle with you With lots of reopened US bases in Greenland we’ve become ‘bookended’

Just imagine if 17 of the 19 attackers came from Canada…..

I think that’s a fair statement.

Why? Even Harper has come out, strongly, that it was in our best interest to walk away. Mulroney and Harper have been the two most pro-US PM’s we ever had and the only one left living has said walking away was the best decision.

So the joining of the JEF in essence would live on if the US pulled out of NATO and we would be part of an 11 nation coalition HQ'd in the UK built around a 10k rapid deployment force, who's primary focus would the Arctic, North Sea, Scandinavia and the Baltic security. Does that summarize it?

Yet another Quebecois seeking the limelight and making it all about them!

Not me, I've never been against foreign investment (exception being some Chinese in certain industries). We've lacked the chutzpah to do it ourselves for the last 3ish decades. Our banks are case in point, very risk adverse for CDN projects, too worried about NIMBYism and upsetting this group or...