Designed by the Demon Crowley, just like he did with the M25 around London. :ROFLMAO:
(Fan of the book and TV series Good Omens will understand the reference).
Of note, the TKMS CEO said at CANSEC they now are able to supply 4 x Type 212CDs to Canada by 2036, by offering up boats that were previously set aside for Germany and Norway. That to me hints at a level of desperation by the Germans.
Another contract, this time related to the underwater warfare side of the RCD:
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2026/05/thales-to-supply-s2087-captas-4-sonar-for-canadas-river-class-destroyers/
I feel this decision reduces the chance of a Gripen buy, or at least reduces the number. It's a win for Saab (and Europe), which from Carney's perspective is an important consideration. I would not be surprised an F35 announcement will be favourable to the US.
Interesting news re. SK's plan to build a nuclear submarine, using LE fuel, something Canada could potentially assist with. Even more reason to go with them if we'd like an eventual path to nuclear boats. The model even looks like the KSS III.
South Korea Unveils Historic Plan to Build First...
Interesting read, applicable to Canada, on how Portugal was able to sail an AIP sub under Arctic waters.
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/04/22/how-portugal-shaped-canadas-new-submarines-and-fine-tuned-arctic-defence
Chuck Hill of US Coast Guard fame did an interesting piece on the CDC:
https://chuckhillscgblog.net/2026/04/25/canadas-team-vigilance-opv-continental-defense-corvette-an-update/
Right, but based on the Brits, it looks like the time to build their T26 is around 7 years, versus 3.5 average for the FDI. It was just a question, not a criticism...
Why couldn't Irving adopt some of the techniques, tools, and procedures used by Naval Group to build their FDI frigates so quickly?
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2026/04/video-how-naval-group-builds-fdi-frigates-so-quickly/
Seen here in this nice description and graphic:
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/rms/documents/naval-launchers-and-munitions/MK41-VLS-product-card.pdf
Also, Noah is claiming the RCN is looking at adding 8 more MK41 cells.
Bottom of the following link: This Week in Defence (03/30/26): River-Class, VLS-Cells, CDC Limits, New Contracts, 2% Talk, New CHER Bundles
MV-75 is very close to being fielded. One would hope this is an option under consideration for nTACS.
https://www.military.com/feature/2026/03/27/mv-75-armys-new-aircraft-and-future-of-air-assault-warfare.html
I don't disagree, but I thought one of the design principles for the first batch of 3 was to use mature and in-service systems to reduce risk as much as possible?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.