• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Search results

  1. TangoTwoBravo

    Life in the CAF (Infantry DEO)

    Glad I could help a little! I will preface my comments by pointing out that my last stint at the Regiment was ten years ago. I am still somewhat connected to goings-on at units (I am in a garrison unit now), but things can and have changed. There is a lot of similarity between what a Armour...
  2. TangoTwoBravo

    GBAD - The return of 'FOBS'

    The Canadian Rangers enable conventional forces but do not undertake direct combat operations. Envisioning them as part of an 11th ABN style formation (which has global remits) shows a misunderstanding of both elements' roles. The MDTF is the US Army answer to the problem of Chinese and...
  3. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    I won't comment on the optimal weapon for a dedicated SHORAD vehicle - such a program will determine that. It could be 30mm. Don't know. What I am saying is that we have hundreds of vehicles with 25mm cannons, and adding another family of AFVs for the direct fire fight with another calibre below...
  4. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    The My comment was based on mech infantry battalions as they exist in Canada - not as outfitted by UOR for the eFP. Each Battalion would need at least 20 integral ATGMs in the 4 to 5k range band. They should also have mortar platoons - dismounted mortars exist but they would have to be manned...
  5. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    I have to assume that you do not understand sustainment in mechanized/armoured units? We try to sustain as close as possible to where the F Ech (the fighting troops) are. LAV Company and Tank Squadron A echelons are different in composition, but broadly follow the same principles. The vehicles...
  6. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    II am not just talking about the VDV. The Russian mechanized BTGs that invaded Ukraine in 2022 were understrength, and as a result they fielded BMP2s that had understrength sections. This meant that when situations called for infantry to get out and do things there weren't enough infantry to do...
  7. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    I am trying to follow your train of thought, which isn't helped when you invent terms or use terms that have other meanings than the ones that I presume you are using. We have an army that was designed in the 60s based on WW2 experience anticipating WW3. Our individual training for our...
  8. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    If we are acquiring new vehicles for this thought experiment (which is a good one), then just get new Leopard 2s or M1s if we are fighting in Europe (so probably M1s). Adding a LAV-equipped "Armd Cav" Sqn to a LAV battalion gives it more reconnaissance, but it doesn't radically change its combat...
  9. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    It’s US Army terminology - used to emotionally and intellectually shake off the GWOT (Global War on Terror). An acronym that can also be used as a verb “Let’s LSCO the heck out of this!”
  10. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    What you are describing is more of a defence with the intent of fixing an attacking force to enable an attack by another force. I don't want to get too specific regarding potential real-world situations. I will say that units and formations fight as part of a higher plan. We have a Canadian-led...
  11. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    I will start with some doctrine geekiness. A Guard is a task to protect the main force by fighting to gain time along with observing and reporting. A guard can be in front or on the flanks, and can be for a static or mobile main force. A Cover operates apart from the main force and...
  12. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    I will ask again, on what are you basing your assertion that the 80s/90s infantry battalion failed to appreciate the value of supporting arms? There was always mess banter between units/branches, but units that went to the field worked with other arms all the time. To your point about...
  13. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    Can I ask as to the nature and context of these observations and conversations? What were you observing and with whom were you conversing? I joined in 1989 and so I was part of about 15 years of the army that had the full combat support companies. Combined arms training could always be...
  14. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    With the forum's forbearance I will continue the Assault Troop thread-jack a little. I have no idea why an Assault Troop would try to get people qualified sniper. Like none. Assault Troop was a blend of skills found in Recce Platoon, Armed Recce Troops and Assault Pioneers. It was very much a...
  15. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    Point of order. The Assault Troop in a Recce Squadron was not a mechanized infantry platoon by another name. They had mobility/counter-mobility tasks, so they were closer to assault pioneers. They could also be used to secure Sqn HQ or the echelon (so similar again to assault pioneers from time...
  16. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    We've done many divisional-level CAXs since then. Most formation-level training in most armies is done through CAX. This particular CAX was an allied corps level one where the constraints were to use equipment that existed. Some of the soldier-level stuff doesn't really shine through in a Corps...
  17. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    I won't speak for GR66, but I am looking at our doctrine in the context of our operational remits. If we tried to field the entire Canadian Army as-is as a Division today we would have plenty of problems. I was part of a Corps-level exercise with allies a few years ago were we explored that...
  18. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    We are already exporting our Level 5 Combat Team and Level 6 for the mech units to Europe, and our Level 6 for the Light Battalions is exported to JPMRC/JRTC. Having a hypothetical BG vehicle set in Germany would allow for live fire (Graefenwhor) and fully-instrumented CT in a less-crowded (but...
  19. TangoTwoBravo

    Infantry Vehicles

    I guess I am trying to see the "so what?" Doctrine is an agreed-upon set of fundamental principles on how we will fight. Our BG-level doctrine is sound, and we can execute it. Our CMBG-level doctrine is also sound, and it applies in what we are leading overseas (with variations, of course, for...
  20. TangoTwoBravo

    Canada's tanks

    I'd be really out in front of my skis if I tried to answer that! I will say, though, that in 2008 to get the armour package as-configured (particularly the belly armour) the work had to be done in Germany. The interior turret stuff, though, could be done in New Brunswick. I am sure that some...
Back
Top