Search results

im not going to address this as even the other thread that @Altair directed us to has been locked

https://web.archive.org/web/20160204101819/https://insideclimatenews.org/sites/default/files/documents/1982%20Exxon%20Primer%20on%20CO2%20Greenhouse%20Effect.pdf one of the earliest works on AGW. Has stood the test of time well Exxon 1982

its the church of the anti Trump and they will be able to ride it as long as Trump continues. Maybe an election in spring/late summer 2028

hmm i was kinda holding out/hoping for some loyal wingman stuff F35 delivery 2026 4 2027 4 2028 8 2029 14 2030 ?? 2031 ?? 2032 ?? Gripens??

maybe its a talking point because it just makes sense? electrification and decarbonization simply refers to removing GHG emitting sources from power uses as much as possible these things are already going on electrification of transportation via EVs/batteries decarbonizing power grids via...

its just evidence. Earlier i posted evidence on the impact of the sun from NASA came with a handy nice little graph. Response was trolling (not from you) Before that why the opinions of Lindzen and Curry should be treated with caution by people unfamiliar with them based on their poor...

really?

I am in favour of electrification and decarbonization no one is alarming me lol who are you having this conversation with?

Its not clear to me that the Carney government has had much influence on these decisions exporting oil and gas from Alberta etc to the world market helps our energy production how? the industrial carbon tax is 9 cents a barrel of oil

is this a federal issue? Or is it Provincial? Im in Ontario we have lots of Hydro and nuclear, Im not sure what influence the Carney government has had on the Ford government Solar and wind seem to work well for some areas

what specific problem are you trying to identify and solve?

seems like another strawman

thats literally the big picture

the ocean absorbs a net 2.6 gigatonnes of carbon a year

the oceans are absorbing CO2 not off gassing

does anyone need to? Science can be separate from policy for something to be true does not mean that something need or ought to be done about it

seems like this talk of a 30 F35 / 60 Gripen split is pretty heavy. I hope it is not true

Im unconvinced that serious people listen to what Charlebois says having followed the discourse between him and leach and tombe and levesque and others.

ghosts of Sea King/EH101 pasts will be with us forever, thus anything is believable. Sometimes politics delivers wins and sometimes it doesnt. I question what the delivery schedule on a Gripen would be and how that would tie into our replacement requirements. Are we going to get a small 4.5 Gen...

oh i know of him and his reputation