Many CIC/COATS members are ex-P Res/Reg F CAF members. They stayed in due to love of the service. Taking away their entitlement to a CAF uniform and accoutrements would likely have a devastating effect on recruiting and retention. I used to work in DGRC and found their D&D was not all that...
In her defense, she wasn't yet a member of the Liberal caucus, so she didn't fully understand her ethical responsibilities as well as Liberals do. She should be alright now that she's crossed the floor from the NDP.
The Cadet organization is the biggest youth movement in Canada. Upwards of 70K kids participate. Doing away with that would cause all those kids to have to seek another origanization which may or may not fit their needs or interests.
I don't have an issue with CIC/COATS wearing a CAF uniform...
I doubt it. The Liberals have taken steps to double down on the consequences of non-compliance with the poorly compensated confiscation program.
The upside is that the tens of thousands of people who are likely to eventually get charged will probably incur significant delay in facing trial...
This government took the same approach to announcements extending the firearms amnesty,waiting until almost the day before it expired to announce the extensions.
That caught my eye, too. They are throwing serious money at the problem. But how many self-deportees will come back and attempt to re-enter the US (legally or not) after a stretch back in the crap hole they fled in the first place?
In Canada you can drive 4 hours and still be in the same postal code prefix and telephone areas code. In Europe, you've crossed three countries. I recall having to explain to my EU colleagues that you couldn't hold a brunch meeting in Halifax and a mess dinner in Calgary and attend both events...
An American client at work today suggested that Trump and Carney should hold a sanctioned boxing match to sort things out. I was quick to point out that none of the four sanctioning bodies would support this as they would be in vastly different weight classes.
First, you just can't ignore laws because they are inconvenient.
Second, Theft does not always equal harm.
Case in point. Many snows ago, I was working for another federal department in protective services. A client had his motorcycle stolen from the parking lot. We had the suspect on...
Any use of a firearm, from brandishing to discharging is lethal force. Hard to articulate the use of lethal force in defence of property. In Canada you not only have to contend with firearms use laws (pointing, reckless use etc.) but also storage laws. That's part of what caught Thompson...
In the big picture I have no real heartache with a civilian using a firearm for self defence when faced with an imminent threat of grievous bodily harm or death (GBHD). However, I'm more reluctant to be supportive of it regarding property crimes or non imminent threat of GBHD. The reason is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.