There is an old saw to the effect that academic arguments are so bitter because they are so inconsequential. In that vein the Fenians have risen again in two venues. Both refer to the major event oof the 1866 invasion of the Niagara peninsula, the Battle of Ridgeway.
In the first, the local BIA (for non-Ontario members this stands for Business Improvement Association which is a voluntary committee of local merchants trying to improve neighborhoods) in Ridgeway has created a storm by using a contemporary Fenian propaganda picture showing three dead Canadian soldiers and a fourth cowering in terror before a Fenian soldier as the emblem on banners for downtown. The two regiments that fought at Ridgeway - the QOR and the RHLI - are outraged and their associations have sent the BIA a long, nasty letter asking them to change the banners. Now, it was incredibly stupid of the BIA to pick the image they did, which they admit, and local personalities got involved, but this should end well. I am on the side of the regiments in this one.
I am not real happy about the second issue which is a possible attempt to obtain a battle honour to both regiments for what was the first battle fought by the Canadian Army since it was created by the Militia Act of 1855. The rationale is that the accepted version of events (the appeareance of cavalry, the order to form square and the subsequent confusion leading to a panic stricken retreat) was concocted at the time to throw the regiments under the bus to deflect the justifiable criticism which was being directed at the British and Canadian colonial authorities for gross mismanagement and incompetence. In fact, while the fabled square was being formed largely from QOR companies that had fired off most of their ammunition and had been withdrawn, about half the force was engaged in a fierce battle with a superior Fenian force assaulting with fixed bayonets from commanding ground. They ultimately gave way and were driven back from the battlefield by the attackers. The difference is that in the conventional version no mention was made of the Fenian attack. To be blunt, the Canadian tactical ability displayed by the senior officers was horrible, but the troops also were without canteens, blankets, packs, reserve ammunition and medical support. The latter was the fault of the authorities, not the units involved. Casualties were about equal for both sides, which indicates it was not the rout of popular account. This may well be decided on emotion, not on merit, perhaps like the War of 1812 honours.
In the first, the local BIA (for non-Ontario members this stands for Business Improvement Association which is a voluntary committee of local merchants trying to improve neighborhoods) in Ridgeway has created a storm by using a contemporary Fenian propaganda picture showing three dead Canadian soldiers and a fourth cowering in terror before a Fenian soldier as the emblem on banners for downtown. The two regiments that fought at Ridgeway - the QOR and the RHLI - are outraged and their associations have sent the BIA a long, nasty letter asking them to change the banners. Now, it was incredibly stupid of the BIA to pick the image they did, which they admit, and local personalities got involved, but this should end well. I am on the side of the regiments in this one.
I am not real happy about the second issue which is a possible attempt to obtain a battle honour to both regiments for what was the first battle fought by the Canadian Army since it was created by the Militia Act of 1855. The rationale is that the accepted version of events (the appeareance of cavalry, the order to form square and the subsequent confusion leading to a panic stricken retreat) was concocted at the time to throw the regiments under the bus to deflect the justifiable criticism which was being directed at the British and Canadian colonial authorities for gross mismanagement and incompetence. In fact, while the fabled square was being formed largely from QOR companies that had fired off most of their ammunition and had been withdrawn, about half the force was engaged in a fierce battle with a superior Fenian force assaulting with fixed bayonets from commanding ground. They ultimately gave way and were driven back from the battlefield by the attackers. The difference is that in the conventional version no mention was made of the Fenian attack. To be blunt, the Canadian tactical ability displayed by the senior officers was horrible, but the troops also were without canteens, blankets, packs, reserve ammunition and medical support. The latter was the fault of the authorities, not the units involved. Casualties were about equal for both sides, which indicates it was not the rout of popular account. This may well be decided on emotion, not on merit, perhaps like the War of 1812 honours.