- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
Can anyone help me with this?
I heard the end of a segment on CBC. Essentially the fella, I think he was a prof. UBC, said the current wording of the agreement between Canada and Afghanistan relating to the handing over of prisoners/detainees, could link Canadian soldiers as war criminals.
It appears, the line of thinking is that if detainees (which had been captured by Canadains) were tortured/mistreated then those Canadian soldiers (involved in the captured/hand over) could be considered war criminals. I guess the take is that the capture by the Canadian's could be viewed as the proximate cause/event that lead to the torture.
Has anyone else heard of this, or did I missunderstand? I am finding it harder and harder to stay focused when the CBC is on.....I just feel the red rage rising....
I heard the end of a segment on CBC. Essentially the fella, I think he was a prof. UBC, said the current wording of the agreement between Canada and Afghanistan relating to the handing over of prisoners/detainees, could link Canadian soldiers as war criminals.
It appears, the line of thinking is that if detainees (which had been captured by Canadains) were tortured/mistreated then those Canadian soldiers (involved in the captured/hand over) could be considered war criminals. I guess the take is that the capture by the Canadian's could be viewed as the proximate cause/event that lead to the torture.
Has anyone else heard of this, or did I missunderstand? I am finding it harder and harder to stay focused when the CBC is on.....I just feel the red rage rising....


