• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Comparative Study:US Ticonderoga AEGIS cruisers vs Russian Slava class cruisers

CougarKing

Army.ca Fixture
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
360
Some food for thought: USN Ticonderoga AEGIS cruisers vs Russian Navy Slava class in combat:

Navy Recognition

Comparison: Russian Navy Slava-class and US Navy Ticonderoga-class Cruisers in Combat

Analysis by Konstantin Sivkov, Ph.D. (military sciences)

Military expert Konstantin Sivkov, a member of the Russian Academy of Rocket, Missile and Artillery Sciences, Ph.D. (military sciences), has assessed a hypothetical battle between a Russian Navy Project 1164 Atlant-class (NATO reporting name: Slava-class) missile cruiser and a US Navy Ticonderoga-class cruiser. The calculation has been performed for each of the compared ships. It has covered all of the missions considered and possible courses of action, and the calculation of an integral effectiveness index of the ships.

(...SNIPPED)

The best way for the Moskva to hit an aircraft carrier is to come within the range of her antiship missiles and fire off a salvo. In such a case, she will certainly deliver a strike against the main body of the carrier strike group (the carrier and three or four screening ships), other conditions being equal. A 16-missile salvo will be countered with multichannel AD systems, fighters on combat air patrol and EW systems. As many as two missiles can be downed by the fighters. The enemy formation’s total AD capability (7-8 to 10-12 units) will eliminate 70-80% of the remaining incoming missiles. The EW gear will reduce their hit probability by 50-60% more. Thus, one or two missiles will reach the carrier at best, i.e. the salvo’s probability of rendering a carrier inefficient equals 0.2.

In a meeting engagement, the Moskva’s chances for hitting the carrier will be much more poor, maybe, nonexistent at all, because the carrier will not allow the Russian cruiser to get within range for a salvo (for this reason, submarines and naval bombers will play the key part in dealing with CVBGs, by the way). The Russian cruiser will be far more effective against surface action forces. Attacking a surface strike force of 2-3 destroyers and guided missile frigates, she can render inefficient or send to the bottom of the sea up to two enemy ships while being invulnerable to them owing to her longer-range weapons. A strike against an amphibious landing task force or a convoy will destroy three to four of the ships, i.e. the Moskva’s combat effectiveness in a battle like that is estimated at 0.3-0.5.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Not a very realistic scenario,because it would mean all out war.As a paper exercise the Russian ship may have the advantage of longer ranger SSM's.US ships of this type are not alone and are part of a battle group including a sub or two.The Russians lack air cover vs a USN cv group.A world war would not see any winners,just losers.
 
tomahawk6 said:
Not a very realistic scenario,because it would mean all out war.As a paper exercise the Russian ship may have the advantage of longer ranger SSM's.US ships of this type are not alone and are part of a battle group including a sub or two.The Russians lack air cover vs a USN cv group.A world war would not see any winners,just losers.
most wars are like that.
 
tomahawk6 said:
Not a very realistic scenario,because it would mean all out war.As a paper exercise the Russian ship may have the advantage of longer ranger SSM's.US ships of this type are not alone and are part of a battle group including a sub or two.The Russians lack air cover vs a USN cv group.A world war would not see any winners,just losers.

:nod:

I was going to ask about the SSN escort that Sivkov forgot to include in his assessment...
 
Back
Top