• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Gadhafi's son bears a grudge

Slim

Army.ca Veteran
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
410
Gadhafi's son bears a grudge


By DOUG SAUNDERS
From Friday's Globe and Mail  

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20041210.wxlibya1210/BNStory/International/

Libya has made peace with America and the West. It has apologized for having jetliners bombed and paid billions to the victims. It has accepted Israel, and allowed the United States to help it demolish uranium refineries and weapons caches.

But Colonel Moammar Gadhafi's powerful son has one grudge still to settle. He is angry with Canada. And he wants payback.

That surprising message was delivered Thursday in an exclusive interview with The Globe and Mail by Seif al-Islam Gadhafi, Col. Gadhafi's second son and presumed successor and the leading figure in Libya's rapprochement with the West.

â Å“The people in Canada, and even the Canadian government â ” they should be aware that we are not happy with Canada,â ? Mr. Gadhafi said, speaking in fluent English with a soft Arabic accent amid the Bengal tigers and peacocks of his compound outside Tripoli.

â Å“And for quite a long time we have regarded Canada as an enemy to Libya, and as just a follower for the Americans.â ?

Prime Minister Paul Martin arrives in Libya Dec. 19 for a two-day visit focused on investment. It could turn into an embarrassment if Col. Gadhafi's soft-spoken, charismatic 32-year-old son makes an issue of Ottawa's past treatment of Libya and his own failure to obtain a visa to study in Canada.

Not only is Mr. Gadhafi the most prominent son of Col. Gadhafi, who has ruled Libya since seizing power in 1969, he is almost single-handedly responsible for turning the country from a menacing rogue state into a force of change in the Arab world. And on top of his growing leadership role, he acknowledged Thursday that he hopes to become Libya's first popularly chosen head of government.

Canada's mistake, he said, was to join the United States and many other countries in adhering to United Nations-imposed sanctions against Libya after the 1988 bombing of a jetliner over Lockerbie, Scotland, that killed 270 people.

Two Canadians were among the victims. Libya accepted responsibility last year and agreed to pay $2.7-billion (U.S.) in compensation to families of those killed.

But Mr. Gadhafi said Canada's adoption of sanctions was unjust, since the bombing was part of a conflict between Libya and the United States in which Canada had no part.

â Å“Really we were quite astonished because we said we had no problem with the Canadians, we haven't attacked Canada, we haven't even harmed any Canadian citizens, and they are so unfriendly with us,â ? Mr. Gadhafi said. â Å“Therefore, Canada should pay the price for that.â ?

He suggested that business opportunities in Libya, where Canadian firms already have investments worth billions of dollars, could be limited unless an apology is offered.

â Å“We have to settle accounts with the Canadians. And I think now is the moment when we have to tell them frankly and directly that you made a mistake, and you have to correct that, and you promise not to repeat it, not today or tomorrow and not with the future generations.â ?

Mr. Gadhafi said Canada appeared to be taking its cue from the United States in the Lockerbie affair. â Å“You cannot adopt an American point of view and you can't be American even sometimes more than the Americans are.â ?

The UN sanctions were selective, including an arms embargo and the banning of flights to and from Libya. They also restricted the travel of suspected Libyan terrorists.

Mr. Gadhafi said that as a 25-year-old he had hoped to attend graduate school in Canada, and asked for a visa at the Canadian embassy in Rome. He said officials rebuffed him, citing the sanctions.

Switzerland and Britain also rejected his requests. Mr. Gadhafi has acknowledged that the rejections spurred him to set up the family charity that last year began negotiating Libya's surprisingly rapid disavowal of terrorism and its embrace of the West, including the Lockerbie settlement and rejection of weapons of mass destruction.

Nevertheless, Mr. Gadhafi said, Canada needs to make amends for what his family regards as an inappropriate gesture.

â Å“The problem is that in the past you followed American policy, and you followed a very bad approach to young students like me at the time,â ? he said. â Å“Now I am in a position to ask you, tell me why I did not get a visa 10 years ago. And you have to answer me. Someone is going to ask him [Mr. Martin] that.â ?

Moreover, he said, Canada is guilty of hypocrisy because Canadian businesses continued to operate in Libya while the government left sanctions in place and maintained no diplomatic representation.

â Å“The Canadians, they play a very clever game,â ? Mr. Gadhafi said. â Å“They didn't stop exploiting any economic opportunity in Libya, but politically they're very anti-Libyan. And therefore they didn't even open an embassy or have any political ties with Libya. But if there is an economic option, they are the first to seize the opportunity.â ?

At another point, he said: â Å“Now, the moment we solve the issue with the Americans, the Lockerbie and WMD â ”now the Canadians are running and coming to Libya, and they want to have a piece of the Libyan cake...Okay, we have nothing against having a piece of our cake, but now we have to settle the issue of our past.â ?

Petro-Canada, which currently controls almost one-tenth of Libya's oil output, has been involved there for at least five years. The engineering firm SNC-Lavalin has played a major role in building Libya's Great Man-Made River, a huge water-diversion project.

Canadian government officials said Thursday they were puzzled by Mr. Gadhafi's accusations.

â Å“There is nothing at all unusual about a country condemning the human-rights practices of another while its companies do business with it,â ? one official with knowledge of the situation said. â Å“And what Petro-Canada and other companies were doing was investing hundreds of millions of dollars in Libya. Is that something he really wants to jeopardize?â ?

Officials involved in the Prime Minister's visit said an apology is unlikely. â Å“We are not going to apologize for enforcing our laws,â ? one said.

By conventional rules of diplomatic protocol, Mr. Martin would have neither reason nor opportunity to address Mr. Gadhafi's concerns. Col. Gadhafi, who transformed Libya into a socialist state based on his idiosyncratic theories after seizing power at the age of 27, holds no rank in the Libyan government. His son, who also holds no government position, is not scheduled to meet Mr. Martin.

But the Gadhafis are inseparable from the Libyan state. Mr. Gadhafi meets senior U.S. officials on behalf of the government and organized a regional election earlier this year.

On Thursday he displayed a knowledge of the dynamics of Canada's Liberal Party. He advised Mr. Martin to let Libya know he has made a break with the policies of his predecessor, Jean Chrétien.

â Å“This is a chance for him to show the Libyan people that he is a different person and a different prime minister and he has a different government and a different approach to the Libyan people,â ? he said. â Å“Just like I cannot compare the [U.S.] Republicans today to the Republicans who were there under [former president Ronald] Reagan.

â Å“Therefore it's a good chance for him [Mr. Martin] to show the Libyan people that that prime minister [Mr. Chrétien] didn't represent Canadian people, Canadian spirit, Canadian culture. We are your friends, and we'll have a friendly visit, and we want co-operation, want to create a better future for both of us.â ?


Slim :cdn: :salute:

PS-Their military is quite a bit larger than ours.... :-[
 
I always had a question about Libya. Why wasn't the Col ever promoted?

I have to question why the PM is in Libya. I wasn't aware that we did much trade with Libya, or that it offered much economic opportunities for Canadian companies.

On a unsettling note...If sonny boy takes charge I would be uncomfortable that he might try and atone for his bruised ego.

This is not what the world needs- another megalomaniac with a grudge.

This is an interesting letter to the editor that appears in today's Ottawa Citizen. http://www.cda-cdai.ca/medialetters/barbara%20yaffe.htm
Dear Editors of the Ottawa Citizen

Re: Barbara Yaffe, Martin Struts the Global State for Benefit at Home, December 8, 2004

Paul Martin is jet setting around the world promoting his vision for Canada to become a bigger and more prominent citizen of the world. While he appears more engaged than his predecessors, unless he matches his rhetoric with money, his trips will serve nothing more than expensive photo opportunities. Currently, Canada's foreign policy options are limited, principally because of cuts to the defence budget. There is an urgent need to increase the resources allocated to defence, diplomacy and development, the so-called "3-Ds," which tied together, form the backbone for a larger role in the world. Particularly vulnerable are the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces, and their well-known and chronic problem of underfunding and overcommitment.  

In order to be an internationally active nation, the Government must have several tools at its disposal, including a strong military. If the government's foreign policy shop has a strong diplomatic corps, military and development program, this provides them with an array of options from which to choose; different situations require different tools. This is where the crucial link between foreign policy and defence is made. The more tools it has in its toolkit, the more likely the Government will be able to provide assistance when the world comes knocking.  

For too long, Canada has ridden on the coattails of a reputation developed in the 1950s-60s. At that time, his father, Paul Martin Sr. could say with credibility, "many nations had an appetite for power without teeth, but Canada [during the Cold War] had developed both the appetite and the teeth for a new international role." While Paul Martin Jr. shares his father's appetite for a larger role for Canada, he must understand that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Policy without teeth will fail, and Canadian influence will have minimal impact on the world's stage.  

The Prime Minister must show leadership and explain to the people of Canada the importance of reinvesting in defence. The CDA believes that this is a matter that requires the urgent attention of the Prime Minister, for only he can redirect the resources to begin the long recovery of the CF. Only he can redirect the governing party, or coax a coalition of Parliament and the federal bureaucracy towards this task. Mr. Prime Minister, show Canadians the money.



Alain Pellerin
Executive Director,
Conference of Defence Associations (CDA)

Conference of Defence Associations
359 Kent Street, Suite 502
Ottawa, ON K2P 0R7
Work (613) 236-1252

Home (613) 744-1176

Email: director@cda-cdai.ca
 
They may have a bigger army then ours but they couldn't get it over here and any terrorism perputrated by them would not be accepted very well by the Americans.  I think he's just flapping his gums and nothing will really come out of this..
 
What happens if they decide to take out their frustrations on the Petro-Canadians and SNC-Lavalians currently working in Libya?

By the way isn't SNC-Lavalin a Quebec company?  -  Should be all right then, they would never request military support from Canada. Would they?
 
â Å“Really we were quite astonished because we said we had no problem with the Canadians, we haven't attacked Canada, we haven't even harmed any Canadian citizens, and they are so unfriendly with us,â ? Mr. Gadhafi said. â Å“Therefore, Canada should pay the price for that.â ?

Doesn't the article say two canadians died in the plane that blew up over Lockerbie?

Am I missing a point? I'd say blowing up people in a plane is "harming" them, but that's just me.
 
Doesn't the article say two canadians died in the plane that blew up over Lockerbie?

Am I missing a point? I'd say blowing up people in a plane is "harming" them, but that's just me.

You'd think so. Apparently it only applies to them, not us...
Gotta love the third world double standard!

Slim
 
Libya's position has changed, PM says

Globe and Mail Update 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20041216.wlibya1216/BNStory/National/


Prime Minister Paul Martin says his trip to meet Libyan leader Colonel Moammar Gadhafi on Sunday is an attempt to show the rest of the world that Col. Gadhafi has changed.

Col. Gadhafi, a former pariah among world leaders, has taken pains in recent years to show that he is now opposed to terrorism. A number of world leaders, including Tony Blair, have visited him in Libya as part of the process of reconciliation. The visits are to recognize Col. Gadhafi for ending his support of terrorism and pledging not to pursue weapons of mass destruction.

Mr. Martin said his trip is for the same reason.

â ?Well, a number of the world leaders have seen him and the reason is fairly evident. There has been a substantial shift in Libya's position over the course of the last couple of years, much more openness, much more transparency. They've also, you know, expressed the desire for a fundamental shift in position, and I think that it's up to all of us to encourage that kind of shift,â ? he told reporters after a cabinet meeting in Ottawa Thursday.

In recent years Libya has acknowledged responsibility and has agreed to pay compensation for the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am airliner over Lockerbie, Scotland, which killed 270 people.

Compensation deals have also been struck for the families of 170 people who died in a 1989 bombing of a French jetliner, and for the 1986 bombing of a German discotheque. Libya has also agreed to dismantle development of weapons of mass destruction and allow international inspectors to visit the facilities.

Mr. Martin said while events of the past should still be recognized, he is willing to help forge a change in relations with Libya.

"Yes, we understand what's happened in the past, but looking ahead, if we simply turn our backs on people who say, look, we're prepared to shift positions, then obviously we're not going to make progress."

At a briefing in Ottawa Thursday, senior officials said the Prime Minister will press Col. Gadhafi to keep his commitments to turn his back on terrorism.

The officials said Mr. Martin will also breach the issue of human rights with Col. Gadhafi.

â Å“Libya has undertaken significant reforms over the past five years, and this visit is an opportunity to encourage the country's leadership to continue along this path. I will also raise a number of topics of mutual interest, including the resolution of regional conflicts in Africa, the situation of human rights in Libya and trade," Mr. Martin said in a prepared statement.

On Monday, Mr. Martin will take part in talks with Canadian businesses involved in civil engineering, aerospace, oil and gas and telecommunications sectors in that country, hoping to drum up more commercial activity for Canada in Libya.

Mr. Martin's trip will be the first visit to that country by a Canadian prime minister.

Mr. Martin will head to Morocco for Christmas. He will visit India, Japan, China and Hong Kong in the new year before returning to Canada on Jan. 23.

 
Hmmm ... so the Prime Minister of Canada is out of the country until January 23rd ... and is going to Morocco for Christmas ... ?
I certainly do not want to insult Morocco, but ... one of the things I love most about Canada is enjoying the Christmas season at home (preferrably with snow).
 
Hmmm ... curiouser and curiouser ... also keeping in mind that now the Canadian Prime Minister is going to fly all the way back to Canada in order to attend a funeral on Monday ... (plus, I'd forgotten about the plight of the nurses in Libya)

Libya trip a real puzzler
WHAT CAN BE GAINED BY THE PM VISITING THE KHADAFFY REGIME, PETER WORTHINGTON WONDERS
By Peter Worthington, Toronto Sun, Sun, December 19, 2004


WHY PRIME Minister Paul Martin is going to Libya today to visit Moammar Khadaffy is one of those imponderables that defies justification. If he were an internationalist as Pierre Trudeau was, it might be more understandable. But Martin is more of a home-country chap.

Trudeau, on the other hand, loved the primitive and exotic. He relished the offbeat trails as much as he did posturing in the established corridors of power.

Martin's recent forays to Haiti, Brazil, Chile, Burkina Faso and, most recently Sudan as a self-styled mediator in the Darfur outrage, seem mostly for image purposes, not for solving anything.

And today -- Libya. Why? Although Khadaffy has supposedly "reformed" and rejoined the company of civilized nations, he has a long way to go. Renouncing nuclear weapons and weapons of instability is fine, as is his vow to no longer finance international terror. It's a beginning.

Although Canada ended trade restrictions on Libya in 1999 and opened an embassy in 2002, there's precious little to recommend that regime as something either to admire or trust. Martin would be justified if he were skeptical and raised questions about six Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor that the Libyan regime has sentenced to death by firing squad.

RINGS FALSELY

This sentence was imposed after they were found guilty of deliberately infecting and killing Libyan children with AIDS, allegedly because they were experimenting to find a cure.

That rings as falsely as the Nobel Peace Prize to the late Yasser Arafat for being a symbol of justice, restraint, compassion, world harmony.

Not enough attention has been paid to the nurses' case, which is despicable.

Six years after it was discovered in 1998 that several hundred kids in a Benghazi hospital had been infected with HIV (some 40 deaths), 23 Bulgarian hospital workers were taken into custody, among whom six nurses and a doctor were charged with deliberately infecting the kids.

They were kept in custody, tortured, beaten and two nurses say they were raped. Under duress, a couple confessed, then retracted their confessions. It never made sense.

In 2001, before his epiphany as a pacifist, Khadaffy attended an African AIDS summit and said the nurses were acting on the orders of the CIA and Israeli intelligence. Sound familiar?

At their trial this spring, the six nurses and a Palestinian doctor were sentenced to death.

Human Rights groups, Amnesty International and the Bulgarian government protested -- but protests don't register much with Khadaffy -- unless they're supported by air strikes of the type former U.S. president Ronald Reagan launched to discourage Libyan terrorism.

APPALLING CONDITIONS

A Libyan magazine (La) investigated the Benghazi children's hospital and found hygienic conditions deplorable. Disposable instruments were repeatedly used, sanitary standards were ignored, hypodermic needles were not necessarily sterilized.

In brief, conditions were reminiscent of what we're told goes on in our prisons and street gangs, where the same needle is repeatedly used by drug users, with HIV infection the inevitable result.

It would seem the Bulgarian nurses were being blamed for inadequate and appalling conditions that the Libyan state imposed on its hospitals.

Today, Libya -- via Khadaffy's son -- hints that the nurses won't be executed if Bulgaria builds a new hospital and pays compensation to the families of dead children. Bulgaria has indignantly refused, arguing that complying with the terms would imply guilt, when there is no guilt involved.

Of course Bulgaria is right.

Why the world (including Canada) isn't more outraged at what has happened to these nurses isn't so much a mystery as it is pragmatic realpolitik. The U.S., and clearly Paul Martin, are so dazzled at Khadaffy's renouncement of terrorism that they (and the West) are prepared to accept any indignities and injustices Khadaffy imposes inside Libya.

There's a similar attitude among people who are incensed at the U.S. for deposing Saddam Hussein, and utterly disinterested in the horrors Saddam inflicted on his own people.

It will be interesting to watch reports of the media who are with Martin this week. Will they express concern about the wretched nurses -- before Martin heads off to Morocco for a Christmas holiday away from snow?
 
Back
Top