Maybe it’s just me, wondering why this shouldn’t be common sense…it’s only the first two factors in first aid…Airway-Breathing(…-Circulation).
Maybe it’s just me, wondering why this shouldn’t be common sense…it’s only the first two factors in first aid…Airway-Breathing(…-Circulation).
And 2/3 rds of this immediate action drill is about the O2 thing...
The indictment alleges that all four defendants saw Mr. Floyd lying on the ground in clear need of medical care and willfully failed to aid him. The indictment alleges that by doing so, all four defendants willfully deprived Mr. Floyd of his constitutional right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law, which includes an arrestee’s right to be free from a police officer’s deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The indictment alleges that this offense resulted in bodily injury to, and the death of, Mr. Floyd.
Sounds like Derek got shived.
Well Jeff Epstein suicided under the watchful eye of Rikers Island staff. Maybe a similar situation here?Why would he not be in what ever the US person of protective custody?
Protective Custody isn’t for convicted criminals.Why would he not be in what ever the US person of protective custody?
“Here's the training manual,” the training manual showing a certain maximal restraint technique of immobilizing a recalcitrant suspect, which has a photograph in it of a man with his knee on the shoulder—not the neck, the shoulder—not in an asphyxiating but in an immobilizing manner. Just as when you see the body cam footage of Derek Chauvin in that position, it's very, very, very similar.
This was not allowed to be introduced into evidence at trial!
GLENN LOURY: We're talking about George Floyd because there has recently been released a documentary film called The Fall of Minneapolis. It's up at Rumble for free. Anybody can look at it. We'll put the URL in the description of this post. It raises a million questions. It's very well done. They have original body cam footage that's been carefully curated and edited and whatnot. It gives you a sense, the arrest of George Floyd, the trial of Derek Chauvin, the aftermath for the police department ...
A jury and a fair trial says he did. Chauvin disgraced himself and our entire profession with his callous disregard and fatal abuse of a prisoner in his custody. He made all of our jobs harder by doing his exceptionally badly. I wish no harm on him, but it was a just verdict under the laws of his state and he deserves the sentence he got.
It comes from paying attention to the trial and the evidence presented, researching the applicable laws of that jurisdiction, watching the video of what happened several times, and the context of my own relevant experience and training. I accept the verdict of the jury and the fairness of the trial on the actual criminal al allegations, and his professional failures are very clear to those of us on the job who are decently trained, objective, and ethical.I envy you your clarity.
It comes from paying attention to the trial and the evidence presented, researching the applicable laws of that jurisdiction, watching the video of what happened several times, and the context of my own relevant experience and training. I accept the verdict of the jury and the fairness of the trial on the actual criminal al allegations, and his professional failures are very clear to those of us on the job who are decently trained, objective, and ethical.
Most of us have been in the position Chauvin was in many times over. Fighting a drugged up suspect until we have control. There was nothing particularly anomalous about the situation that was in. He made his choices, and that’s where his event differed criminally from the norm.
A jury and a fair trial says he did. Chauvin disgraced himself and our entire profession with his callous disregard and fatal abuse of a prisoner in his custody. He made all of our jobs harder by doing his exceptionally badly. I wish no harm on him, but it was a just verdict under the laws of his state and he deserves the sentence he got.
Of course they can. But as of now he’s guilty of second degree involuntary murder (‘felony murder’ doctrine), and third degree ‘depraved heart’ murder. Personally, having actually looked into what these mean in Minnesota law, I agree with both. I don’t think he’d have been convicted of murder as Canada defines it- likely aggravated assault, and criminal negligence causing death - but the laws in his jurisdiction fit the convictions to the facts.I was under the impression that even after conviction defendants were allowed to protest their innocence and appeal their convictions. Including in the event they believed that their trial was flawed.
I’ve watched a numbers of the videos and looked at the Restraint methods in the Department’s Policy (at the time).A jury and a fair trial says he did. Chauvin disgraced himself and our entire profession with his callous disregard and fatal abuse of a prisoner in his custody. He made all of our jobs harder by doing his exceptionally badly. I wish no harm on him, but it was a just verdict under the laws of his state and he deserves the sentence he got.