Kal said:Well, seeing as many weapon malfunctions are magazine and ammo related and how the current mags are produced en masse and the amount of abuse they take, I'm not sure how you come to that understanding. Just as anyone who shoots a 1911 will know to use wilson combat mags in it, because of the increased reliability.
Wesley H. Allen said:HK has engineered these new mags for the UK L85A2 and L86A2. I have one, and yes they are the bees knees for durable, but they are steel, made for steel recievers ( Minimi would be okay), not alloy ones in the M16 FOW. Yes, it is longer.
KevinB said:I have not seen any that hit the desert - I detect a rationale from your above - steel/aluminum comment...
Kal said:Why can't the steel mag be used properly in an alloy receiver, or is that just the L85/L86 mag being used for the M16 series? I was under the impression that HK developed these mags for the M16 series also, is this a different High Reliability mag?
Cpl.Banks(Cdt.) said:So what happend to those french mags? Ive been doing my C7 training a few weeks ago and we were doing the usual load, unload, prepare for inspection etc... And quite a few times with doing the unload I have heard and seen people dropping the mags on the floor. They dont seem to get banged up, then again this is indoors. But my point is our mags arent bad, in fact i like them, the springs are strong and the outer shell also very strong. The HK mags are nice, a little bit bigger, and alot more expe$ive! Keep ours, wait for the C7 to be phased out(12-16 yr) and get on with your lives! We can leave the bitching to the armchair generals!
UBIQUE!!!!! ;D