• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Indirect Fires Modernization Project - C3/M777 Replacement

You should note several issues about 25 Div which is an active army unit based in Hawaii.

First it only has two brigades but both of these are converting to the lighter, leaner MBCT format. There's been a lot of movement as between Hawaii, Washington state and Alaska as to the units there and their role vis-a-vis Korea. I'm not sure if any particular active or ARNG BCT is currently tasked to round out 25 ID.

Note the establishment below which shows what an MBCT based US army infantry division now looks like (albeit most will have three BCTs and three arty battalions and their light brigade support battalions are in fact organic to the divisional sustainment brigade)

Note that it is 2-11 FAR that is the HIMARS battalion.

25th_US_Infantry_Division_-_Organization_2026.png



I think that this is, in particular even more important than rerolling a battalion to HIMARs.

Note the inclusion of the 125th Intelligence & Electronic Warfare (I&EW) battalion to the DivArty establishment. This is a relatively new battalion (perhaps more like reactivated as divisional intelligence assets were downsized in 2005) There is a recent article about I&EW here:
Note that not all divisions include the I&EW battalion with div arty - see the converted 101 Airborne Div establishment here.

101st_US_Airborne_Division_-_Organization_2026.png


IMHO, the I&EW battalion is a critical component in any division structure. I've included something like them in my own Napkin forces and called the Pan-domain regiments which I describe as follows:



I'm of the view that the I&EW (or pan-domain) battalion ought to be centred in the arty brigade and in fact become the fires hub.

🍻

The 25th is one of the experimental Divs.

For me one of the critical points about it and its sister div, the 11th, is that both divs have a full array of div support assets but they only support 6 inf battalions and no cavalry units. In addition some of the references I have seen suggest that two of the six infantry units are re-roled cavalry units that were/are ISTAR focused.

The MBCTs are reduced in strength to 1900 effectives from 4500.


Continuing an American tradition of sending a bullet instead of a man.

The Area of influence of those few, and small, battalions is massive.
 
Back
Top