• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Need rescuing? wait for a weekday

Colin Parkinson

Army.ca Relic
Subscriber
Reaction score
15,696
Points
1,160
Need rescuing? wait for a weekday
 
Colin Kenny
For The Calgary Herald


Tuesday, June 26, 2007


If you are a foundering fisherman off the Grand Banks, or a lost child in the Alberta foothills, or a downed pilot in remote territory outside of Yellowknife or a missing boater on the Great Lakes, here is my advice to you:

Do yourself a favour. Wait another five years or so to get in that kind of desperate trouble. Until then, the government of Canada isn't going to have the kind of resources it should have in place to rescue you.

One more thing. Don't go missing outside office hours. Canada's current search-and-rescue operations tend to go a bit limp on weekends and in the evenings. Urgency takes a breather in the interests of dollars and cents.

Canada can be an unforgiving country for those who go missing. Much of our terrain is rough, remote and seemingly endless. Our waters can be wild and frigid. This is a country whose history is dotted with dramatic search and rescue efforts -- some successful, some not.

We need an effective, robust search-and-rescue capacity, and the current government's Canada First military strategy should be assuring us that we have one. It isn't.

Even this government's Liberal predecessors -- notoriously parsimonious when it came to military spending -- recognized Canadians need an effective search and rescue capacity and in 2003 declared its upgrade a priority. Unfortunately, that government didn't approve the purchase of needed replacement fixed wing aircraft before it left office. The project was still in limbo when an election was called.

Priorities don't disappear when governments change -- or shouldn't. The Fixed Wing Search and Rescue Aircraft Project seemed to in good hands when the Conservatives announced during the campaign that the heart of their military policy would be "Canada First."

If there is anything that is "Canada First," it is maintaining a capable search and rescue capacity for its citizens and others visiting the country.

But then the new government expanded Canada's commitment in Afghanistan, which has turned out to be a much more expensive proposition than expected.

As a result -- shhh!! -- the Canada First policy has become a Canada Second policy, perhaps for the next five years, perhaps for much longer.

Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor has ordered a review of Canada's Search and Rescue capacity in the wake of growing doubts about the government's claims that Canada will not run short of fixed wing aircraft to provide adequate Search and Rescue.

Fixed-wing aircraft are essential to Search and Rescue. They can go farther and faster than helicopters and keep the situation in hand while helicopters, ships or ground vehicles are en route. Most of the fixed wing aircraft the Canadian Forces has been using for search and rescue in recent years -- Buffaloes and Hercules -- are old.

The government announced purchases of 17 new Hercules in June 2006, but these will initially be needed in Afghanistan and will not be available for search and rescue in Canada until our commitment in Afghanistan ends in 2010 -- if it does end then.

The government claims it will make more of the current fleet of ungrounded Hercules available for search and rescue by purchasing C17s and C130Js for moving troops and equipment over long distances, an argument that has a degree of truth to it. But those Hercules are going to require more and more maintenance -- like the infamous Sea King Helicopters that spent many hours in the shop for every hour they spent in the air.

Meanwhile, skimping on search and rescue makes responses to potential tragedies more dangerous on weekends. While search-and-rescue squadrons must be ready to fly within 30 minutes of any emergency during daytime working hours from Monday to Friday, the maximum response time is two hours in the evening hours and on weekends.

The Canadian Press recently reported that the Department of National Defence has estimated that as much as $2 billion would have to be added to DND's budget to ensure a 30-minute response capacity around the clock, seven days a week.

Canada needs a well-equipped military to support its troops in Afghanistan. It also needs a well-equipped military to protect Canadians at home.

Sooner or later a Canadian government is going to have to recognize that we Canadians are spending far less on our military capacity than most other reasonable mid-sized countries. At home or abroad, there is a price to pay for that.

Senator Colin Kenny is Chair of the Senate Committee on National Security and Defence. He can be reached via email at [email protected]

© The Calgary Herald 2007
http://www.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=751dcb20-f093-4b78-86b5-127afdeddaa0
 
Friggin Liberal wanker!!


I sent this in, although I had more to say I needed to keep it short:

Colin Kenny wrote an article for Canada.com on the poor state of search and rescue (SAR) in Canada. He implies that the Harper government has placed SAR on a low priority because of the current military operations. He makes a statement that it is better to call for help on a weekday, which is actually true. However It’s a is an underhanded way to make it appear that the Harper and O’Conner are at fault for the current situation.

In actually fact it was the Liberals who created the current situation. The replacement for the Hercules and Buffalo SAR aircraft should have happened a decade ago, but Chretian decided to buy himself Challenger Jets from his buddies instead. They finally relented to buy SAR helicopters as the old ones were falling out of the sky. Part of the current problem is to find a replacement for the Buffalo aircraft, neither of the 2 contenders are a perfect replacement and some current capabilities may be lost.

Another issue Senator Kenny ignores is that common practice of putting SAR aircrews to a 4hr standby response after working hours and weekends was a cost saving measure started by the Liberals, not to mention the lack of sufficient fuel for SAR vessels.

Thanks to decades of neglect by the Liberals, Harper and O’Conner have to make many hard decisions, in regard to the Forces, there is not enough money, people and time to fix everything at once. But judging by the growing morale of the military, the decades of darkness are lifting
 
I think we do a great job and respond quickly in times of need, so many Arm Chair Quarterbacks out there!

 
IRONMAN3 said:
I think we do a great job and respond quickly in times of need,

And there are hundreds of people alive today who can confirm that for you. Ones who without you, wouldn't be here. Good on you for that.
 
When I worked in CCG SAR the Air Force SAR crews were put on 4 hour standby at 4:00pm, is this still the case today?
 
Not sure when we were on 4hrs after 4pm!!(do not believe it ever has been) Secondary Sar assest like the Combat support units (griffon's) may be on 4hrs notice.But even they get in quickly when the call comes in!  We are on 30min notice during the week days and 2 hours after hours and on weekends!
Regardless there is more to a rescue mission then time response of the aircraft that we use to conduct the missions!! Many lives saved and many more will be!

Best regards!!

 
The 4 hr standby comment came straight from members of 442 squadron who I was practicing diving with back in the mid 90’s. I am very aware of all of the complexity of responding to SAR incidents, I did 15 years in the CCG. I am also aware of how hard and expensive it is to maintain an instant response to SAR calls.
We used to maintain a radio watch at the station as we would often hear the radio messages and start planning and preparing ourselves and be flashed up for the call from RCC.
 
Hi Colin,

442 maintains the same posture that Ironman just mentioned. 

We may very well have had some sort of 4 hour posture back in the 90's - not too many long in the tooth members around that can hail from those days.

Cheers
 
Zoomie said:
Hi Colin,

442 maintains the same posture that Ironman just mentioned. 

We may very well have had some sort of 4 hour posture back in the 90's - not too many long in the tooth members around that can hail from those days.

Cheers

When you guys dont have servicable airplanes i instantly go to 2 hour standby
 
Zoomie said:
Hi Colin,

442 maintains the same posture that Ironman just mentioned. 

We may very well have had some sort of 4 hour posture back in the 90's - not too many long in the tooth members around that can hail from those days.

Cheers

Gee thanks for making me feel old........ ;)
I think they were flying  Stranraer's  ;D
 
Colin P said:
Gee thanks for making me feel old........ ;)
I think they were flying  Stranraer's  ;D

I was with 407 one hangar over from approx 91 to 94.  I remember those days quite well.  And yes, I feel extra aches and pains today for it - we're all getting old!  :crybaby:
 
Back
Top