• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'

daftandbarmy

Army.ca Fossil
Reaction score
41,558
Points
1,160
Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'

The uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story, writes Christopher Booker.


If one thing more than any other is used to justify proposals that the world must spend tens of trillions of dollars on combating global warming, it is the belief that we face a disastrous rise in sea levels. The Antarctic and Greenland ice caps will melt, we are told, warming oceans will expand, and the result will be catastrophe.
Although the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) only predicts a sea level rise of 59cm (17 inches) by 2100, Al Gore in his Oscar-winning film An Inconvenient Truth went much further, talking of 20 feet, and showing computer graphics of cities such as Shanghai and San Francisco half under water. We all know the graphic showing central London in similar plight. As for tiny island nations such as the Maldives and Tuvalu, as Prince Charles likes to tell us and the Archbishop of Canterbury was again parroting last week, they are due to vanish.
But if there is one scientist who knows more about sea levels than anyone else in the world it is the Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Mörner, formerly chairman of the INQUA International Commission on Sea Level Change. And the uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner, who for 35 years has been using every known scientific method to study sea levels all over the globe, is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story.
Despite fluctuations down as well as up, "the sea is not rising," he says. "It hasn't risen in 50 years." If there is any rise this century it will "not be more than 10cm (four inches), with an uncertainty of plus or minus 10cm". And quite apart from examining the hard evidence, he says, the elementary laws of physics (latent heat needed to melt ice) tell us that the apocalypse conjured up by
Al Gore and Co could not possibly come about.
The reason why Dr Mörner, formerly a Stockholm professor, is so certain that these claims about sea level rise are 100 per cent wrong is that they are all based on computer model predictions, whereas his findings are based on "going into the field to observe what is actually happening in the real world".
When running the International Commission on Sea Level Change, he launched a special project on the Maldives, whose leaders have for 20 years been calling for vast sums of international aid to stave off disaster. Six times he and his expert team visited the islands, to confirm that the sea has not risen for half a century. Before announcing his findings, he offered to show the inhabitants a film explaining why they had nothing to worry about. The government refused to let it be shown.
Similarly in Tuvalu, where local leaders have been calling for the inhabitants to be evacuated for 20 years, the sea has if anything dropped in recent decades. The only evidence the scaremongers can cite is based on the fact that extracting groundwater for pineapple growing has allowed seawater to seep in to replace it. Meanwhile, Venice has been sinking rather than the Adriatic rising, says Dr Mörner.
One of his most shocking discoveries was why the IPCC has been able to show sea levels rising by 2.3mm a year. Until 2003, even its own satellite-based evidence showed no upward trend. But suddenly the graph tilted upwards because the IPCC's favoured experts had drawn on the finding of a single tide-gauge in Hong Kong harbour showing a 2.3mm rise. The entire global sea-level projection was then adjusted upwards by a "corrective factor" of 2.3mm, because, as the IPCC scientists admitted, they "needed to show a trend".
When I spoke to Dr Mörner last week, he expressed his continuing dismay at how the IPCC has fed the scare on this crucial issue. When asked to act as an "expert reviewer" on the IPCC's last two reports, he was "astonished to find that not one of their 22 contributing authors on sea levels was a sea level specialist: not one". Yet the results of all this "deliberate ignorance" and reliance on rigged computer models have become the most powerful single driver of the entire warmist hysteria.
•For more information, see Dr Mörner on YouTube (Google Mörner, Maldives and YouTube); or read on the net his 2007 EIR interview "Claim that sea level is rising is a total fraud"; or email him – [email protected] – to buy a copy of his booklet 'The Greatest Lie Ever Told'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/5067351/Rise-of-sea-levels-is-the-greatest-lie-ever-told.html

 
Now if you had ever listened to CFRA 580 AM in Ottawa over the years, Lowell Green could have explained that all to you quite easily with his example.  Simply fill a glass with water and Ice cubes.  Let the Ice Cubes melt and see if the glass overflows.  So simple anyone with a smik could do it at home.
 
well to be fair, a large amount of ice isn't floating in the ocean it's on land, however I'm inclined to trust the man who's been in the field for 25 years actually measuring whats going on, rather than the scare mongers running simplistic computer models that can't predict the weather next week, let alone 20 years from now
 
i agree with c_canuk
but Lowel is somewhat right as well:
the ice sitting on Greenland and Antartica (as opposed to the ice floating in the Arctic and aound Antartica) put pressure on the continent  - pressing it down. When the ice melts the land bounces back and rises (that as been shown by science) so the net gain in sea level is very small. Then if the atmosphere is warmer (why would the ice melt anyway) it can hold more moisture and reduce the effect more.

But I am no scientist and haven't studyed sea levels (
 
Lowell was talking about sea ice. It seems to me that it would take more than a few degrees rise in the global temperature to cause serious and prolonged melting of the huge Greenland and Antarctic ice caps, but I am not a climate scientist.
 
Al Gore? Making up statistics? Never.

He wouldn't do it to sell a medicore piece of entertainment (An Inconvienient Truth), or to explain away how an election was 'stolen' from him. Nahh, not him. Not the guy whose hand crafted suits could feed an African country for a year. Not the guy who campaigns for global warming by jetting around the world in private aircraft (airplanes are huge carbon emitters) and travelling by a multi-vehicle convoy.

No, couldn't be him.

(Can you tell how much I despise the man yet?)

Interesting read, and yet another weapon in my 'calm down, the sky isn't falling' arsenal to combat the global warming Chicken Littles. 
 
I know a real scientist (who drinks beer) and he noted that we spend more in a year trying to sell hairspray to people than we do on environmental research. Do the arithmetic and figure out how accurate any of these predictions are....
 
daftandbarmy said:
I know a real scientist (who drinks beer) and he noted that we spend more in a year trying to sell hairspray to people than we do on environmental research. Do the arithmetic and figure out how accurate any of these predictions are....

Do the people buying hairspray believe in global warming?  ;)
 
Piper said:
Al Gore? Making up statistics? Never.

He wouldn't do it to sell a medicore piece of entertainment (An Inconvienient Truth), or to explain away how an election was 'stolen' from him. Nahh, not him. Not the guy whose hand crafted suits could feed an African country for a year. Not the guy who campaigns for global warming by jetting around the world in private aircraft (airplanes are huge carbon emitters) and travelling by a multi-vehicle convoy.

No, couldn't be him.

(Can you tell how much I despise the man yet?)

Interesting read, and yet another weapon in my 'calm down, the sky isn't falling' arsenal to combat the global warming Chicken Littles.

What? The guy who's estate uses more electricity than the town it's in? The same guy that invented the internet?
 
Back
Top