- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 430
Any thoughts on why this is not standard fit on all warships, beyond price?
Ex-Dragoon said:I was thinking for the more frequent littoral type of operations we do these days it would be more prudent for a CPF or 280 to have one fitted. Is this not the case?
Ex-Dragoon said:Sorry I probably wasn't clear....I am referring to a mission fit for "just in case". Have it fitted as a back up so to speak.
Mud Recce Man said:okay in very simple terms, considering I am a land-lover and OPSEC, what is the benefit of side scan vice "the other kind you use".
Just curious...
Ex-Dragoon said:Sorry I probably wasn't clear....I am referring to a mission fit for "just in case". Have it fitted as a back up so to speak.
TAS278 said:Oh and you guys seemed to educate yourselves very well. Most of what you are saying is bang on
TAS278 said:Unfortunately the gear requires computer upgrades and system modifications for each vessel we use. So with that said it can become quite "exstensive" for a load out. If you go down to the dockyard today you will see our gear is on a MCDV as we speak.