• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Ghosts of Liberals/ Democrats Past thread.


New Lawsuit Claims Former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Was Caught Accessing Child Pornography by RCMP During His Time in Office

Toronto — A bombshell filing in the Ontario Small Claims Court on April 8, 2026, has revealed a tangled web of personal connections and criminal allegations involving former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, his wife Sophie Grégoire Trudeau, and the Toronto Star. The plaintiff, Canadian author of In Trudeau’s Kitchen, Jeffrey Brown, alleges that the newspaper breached its fiduciary duty to the public by suppressing evidence of high-level criminality that could have collapsed the Trudeau Liberal government years before his 2025 exit.

Brown's court filing details an unexpected personal history between him and the Prime Minister's family, which the plaintiff claims began in February 2017 after Trudeau's wife, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau, shared some of Brown's writing on Facebook. This initial interaction reportedly sparked a multi-year connection involving the exchange of hundreds of emails, a telephone call, and a private meeting at the family's residence, Rideau Cottage, which Brown notes occurred at her request. Brown claims that he ultimately made three separate efforts to "disconnect" from Mrs. Trudeau and the political world surrounding the Trudeaus between September 2019 and June 2021. He claims that the nature of the responses to these attempts, coupled with his own experiences of the Trudeau family detailed in his book, In Trudeau’s Kitchen, led him to reach out to investigative journalists beginning in January 2021.

According to the filing, on October 21, 2021, a meeting took place between Brown and prominent Toronto Star investigative journalist Robert Cribb. Brown alleges that during a walk along Kew Beach in Toronto, Cribb revealed that the RCMP had discovered the Prime Minister was watching "kiddie porn" (underage pornography) on his devices while monitoring them for potential foreign compromise.

The filing claims the RCMP handed this information to the Toronto Star because they were facing "interactive restrictions" similar to those experienced during the SNC-Lavalin affair. Brown maintains that although Cribb allegedly confirmed the source was credible, the newspaper failed to fulfill its responsibility to share the information with the Canadian public.

The legal argument centers on a "fiduciary duty" Brown claims the Toronto Star owes the public due to its receipt of significant federal subsidies, which he notes reached approximately $115,000 per week in tax credits by 2022. Brown introduces a proposed new tort called "Enhanced Duty Breach," arguing that when a private media enterprise is kept afloat by taxpayer funds, it has a heightened obligation to report bravely on government misconduct. He claims that by choosing to "protect its market share" and filter information through a "politically convenient filter," the newspaper committed nonfeasance and negligent misrepresentation.

Brown is suing for the maximum allowed $50,000 in damages, linking the suppressed information to the continuation of the Trudeau government and the subsequent administration of Mark Carney.

The filing cites a litany of national issues, including the rise of tent cities, inflation, and personal safety concerns, as the "needlessly difficult reality" caused by the media's alleged nondisclosure. The claim includes $20,000 for pain and suffering related to mental distress, $20,000 for quantifiable monetary losses due to rising costs of living, and $10,000 in punitive damages to address the "plague" of withholding newsworthy material.

You can read the court filing at the link below.

I read the filing. It was ten minutes of diving into someone’s mental health crisis I’ll never get back.
 
I read the filing. It was ten minutes of diving into someone’s mental health crisis I’ll never get back.

For a really good laugh, here's a review of Brown's book "In Trudeau's Kitchen" from Audible

Let me save you some time
Amazon Customer
·
Feb 26, 2026
Here’s the situation:

Sophie confided in this man whom she respected as a celebrity spiritual guru. She shared her sexual frustrations, and Jeff interpreted this as her desire to have an affair with him, though she never actually made a move in this direction. In his mind, failure to engage in a sexual relationship with her, along with the salacious scoop that Sophie is a human being with an active libido, gave him the political power to take down the liberal administration. This made him the target of a terror campaign for years on end. Every instance of friction in his life was an attack by the Trudeaus, and everyone was in on it. Every institution and corporation had been weaponized against him, and they were trying to murder him and his wife with spam. Every aggressive driver on the freeway. Every sideways glance in a coffee shop. Every phishing scam.

Even if there is a kernel of truth at the heart of this story, he comes off the page as narcissistic and delusional. How anyone can take this man seriously as anything other than another “self-help” con artist is beyond me.

However, I am clearly just another part of the game. A techno terrorist sent by JT himself to listen to the mad ramblings of a self-deifying douche bag, and ruin his life by means of a negative review. Yes, that’s it. Jeff Brown holds god-like power and must be mildly inconvenienced at all costs.

I wasted my time and money, please do spare yourself.

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
I think its a nuisance lawsuit and I would like to see the proof.
Well, a document HAS been filed with Toronto Small Claims Court against the Toronto Star, but it's not downloadable from the public court portal. So if the Google Docs link has what was indeed filed (also attached for the record), it's now upgraded to a case of one guy saying someone at the Star said something and didn't publish it. Now he wants $50K because (from the claim "by not providing this information, both I and many of my fellow Canadians ended up in a terrible mess, and now with another globalist (Carney) at the helm ... our country is losing its lustre."

A guy with the same name has published this book ...
... with a bit of critique posted above. More on the dude in the attached bio from Amazon.

Presumed innocent until proven guilty via due process and all that - we'll see how Toronto's Small Claims Court rules, then.
 

Attachments

I think its a nuisance lawsuit and I would like to see the proof.
That's where I am on this. I'd rather see what they have in discovery, to prove the allegations. Rather than the filing. I mean, he might be a loon but if he has the goods, well, that's what matters right?

Three camps. Those that want to crucify him. Those that want to hug and succor him. And those that will wait for proof, or could care less.
 
That's where I am on this. I'd rather see what they have in discovery, to prove the allegations. Rather than the filing. I mean, he might be a loon but if he has the goods, well, that's what matters right?
Does small claims court work the same way as regular courts re: discovery? Because it would be TorStar having to dish if the rules are the same, and I’m going to guess they’re going to be … to be kind … stingy in sharing journalist notes.

Also, the claim out there, if the same as the one with the courts, suggests this may not be the only legal road he’s going to go down.

Wonder if he shared the allegations in his book?
 
Does small claims court work the same way as regular courts re: discovery? Because it would be TorStar having to dish if the rules are the same, and I’m going to guess they’re going to be … to be kind … stingy in sharing journalist notes.

Also, the claim out there, if the same as the one with the courts, suggests this may not be the only legal road he’s going to go down.

Wonder if he shared the allegations in his book?
Small Claims has discovery but it’s more limited. Also bear in mind that the Journalistic Sources Protection Act makes it very, very hard to pierce journalistic source privilege in either criminal or civil proceedings.

I’ll be surprised to see this matter go very at all. Lots of it doesn’t come remotely close to passing a sniff test to me, starting with the claim that police monitor the contents of the PM’s phone for national security purposes… If there’s a federal entity maintaining security of the PM’s communications, it ain’t gonna be cops.
 
Does small claims court work the same way as regular courts re: discovery? Because it would be TorStar having to dish if the rules are the same, and I’m going to guess they’re going to be … to be kind … stingy in sharing journalist notes.

Also, the claim out there, if the same as the one with the courts, suggests this may not be the only legal road he’s going to go down.

Wonder if he shared the allegations in his book?
Bri beat me to it.
 
"Tom Mulcair, a popular CTV commentator the former leader of the New Democratic Party and leader of the Official Opposition from 2012 to 2015, appeared this week on Power Play with host Vassy Kapelos. When the Liberal representative who was scheduled to appear as well, was a no-show, Mulcair had the floor and wiped it up with Carney. Mulcair did not deal in generalities, but with numbers, dates, and names.
Mulcair: “Canada is being led by an empty, rote politician full of hypocrisy and I am tired of pretending otherwise.”
"Mark Carney speaks in the language of competence but governs in the language of evasion. He tells Canadians he is a steady hand on the tiller. But the tiller is broken. The ship is drifting. And he is too busy reading his own press clippings to notice.”
“Let us begin with immigration,” Mulcair said. “In 2025, the Carney government admitted 1.2 million new permanent residents. That is not a typo. 1.2 million. Our housing stock grew by just over 200,000 units in the same period.” “A child can do this math. But the prime minister, the former central banker, the supposed genius of macroeconomic management, cannot? Or will not?”
“the economic decline that no one in Ottawa is allowed to name.” “Unemployment has risen for six consecutive months,” he continued. “Business insolvencies are at a fifteen-year high excluding the pandemic. And what does the prime minister do? He gives a speech at the World Economic Forum about the ‘promise of inclusive growth.'" “Inclusive growth does not put food on the table when your paycheck has been swallowed by inflation. Inclusive growth does not keep the lights on when your province is raising electricity rates because federal mandates have strangled energy production.”
“And then there is the matter of leadership, or rather, the absence of it.” Mulcair noted bringing up three of Carney's biggest faux pas. “This is not a leader; this is a man who has spent his entire adult life being told he is the smartest person in the room. And he believed it. But the smartest person in the room does not preside over a country that is falling apart while insisting everything is fine.”
“Look at his cabinet,” Mulcair continued. “Look at his inner circle. How many of them have ever run a small business? How many of them have ever lived in a rural community? How many of them have ever missed a mortgage payment?” “None. Zero. They are disconnected elites governing on behalf of other disconnected elites. And the rest of Canada? The rest of Canada can wait.”
After the broadcast, a senior Liberal strategist commented, “He wasn’t wrong about everything, that’s the problem. He said things that our own focus groups have been telling us for months. We just didn’t expect to hear them on live television.”
(This is a summary of an article that appeared in the North Wave News on May 30, 2026 )
— Linda Lanois post to Alberta Canada Campaign, June 2, 2026

Most Canadians recognize this.
 

RIGHT DISHONOURABLE: Scandals that defined the Trudeau era
Here's a list of some of the more notable goofs, scandals and blunders that defined the Trudeau era

Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Jan 11, 2025 • Last updated Jan 11, 2025 • 10 minute read

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s nearly decade-long time in office was defined by a regular stream of scandals, faux pas and controversies — many of which brought the PM to his knees but, against all odds, managed to maintain the confidence of his party.
While this list doesn’t cover everything, here’s a sampling of some of the biggest blunders, goofs and scandals committed by the PM and his government over the past 10 years.

CASH-FOR-ACCESS SCANDAL (2016)
In Dec. 2016, The Globe and Mail reported pricey Liberal Party cash-for-access events held at homes of wealthy Chinese-Canadians, charging attendees as much as $1,525 each in exchange for one-on-one time with the PM.

The scheme, according to media reports, would see the party collect between $50,000 and $120,000 in donations from each of these events, some featuring hosts and guests with uncomfortable ties to Beijing.

Among the first measures implemented by the Trudeau Liberals upon coming to power were new “open and accountable” rules governing lobbying and political fundraising, but then-Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson absolved Trudeau of any wrongdoing — despite her office never opening a formal investigation into the matter.

More at link.
 
Back
Top