1 French, 3 American troops killed in Afghanistan
Fisnik Abrashi, Associated Press Writer – 35 mins ago
KABUL – Three U.S. troops were killed Saturday when roadside bombs ripped through their patrol in southern Afghanistan, while a French soldier died in a gunbattle north of the capital, officials said.
The Americans were killed in the southern Kandahar province, said Navy Chief Petty Officer Brian Naranjo. He gave no further details on the blasts, pending notification of the victims' families.
Roadside bombs have become the militants' weapon of choice in Afghanistan, and the number of such attacks has spiked this year, as thousands of additional American forces have joined the fight. President Barack Obama has ordered 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan and expects the total number of U.S. forces here to reach 68,000 by year's end.
That's double the number of U.S. troops that were in Afghanistan in 2008 but still half as many as are now in Iraq.
Deaths among U.S. and other NATO troops have also soared this year. With 74 foreign troops killed — including 43 Americans — July was the deadliest month for international forces since the start of the war in 2001.
Separately a French soldier was killed and two others were wounded during a clash with insurgents north of Kabul, the French military said in a statement.
The military said the slain corporal was part of a 230-strong joint Afghan and French force that came under attack from the Taliban in a valley north of Kabul early Saturday. It did not say how many insurgents launched the attack, but said it led to a clash that lasted more than one hour and two French soldiers were wounded. There were no reports of Taliban casualties.
France has lost 29 soldiers in Afghanistan since 2001, and has 2,900 troops in the country.
In Paris, a statement from President Nicolas Sarkozy's office said he condemned the soldier's killing and "reiterated France's determination to fight, alongside the Afghan people, against obscurantism and terrorism."
There are currently 62,000 U.S. troops and 39,000 allied forced in Afghanistan, on top of about 175,000 Afghan soldiers and police. Some NATO countries plan to withdraw their troops in the next couple of years, even as the U.S. ramps up its presence.
___
Associated Press writer Alfred de Montesquiou contributed to this report.
Five foreign troops killed in Afghanistan
Sun Aug 2, 9:29 AM
By Paul Tait
KABUL (Reuters) - Three Americans were among five foreign troops killed in Afghanistan on Sunday, continuing a deadly trend ahead of a presidential election this month.
The deaths were the latest in an escalation of violence which threatens to overshadow the August 20 ballot, a poll seen as a test for both Washington and Kabul after eight years of war.
The Taliban have vowed to disrupt the election and have called on Afghans to boycott the ballot, the second direct vote for president since the Islamists were toppled in 2001.
A statement by NATO-led foreign forces said a patrol was hit by a roadside bomb in the east on Sunday and was then attacked with small-arms fire. The three troops were killed during the engagement with unidentified insurgents, NATO said.
U.S. military spokeswoman Lieutenant Commander Christine Sidenstricker identified the three as American. No other details were immediately available.
The International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan also said on Sunday that two soldiers were killed when their patrol was hit by two roadside bombs in the volatile south.
Sidenstricker said the two were not American. (LINK)
August has so far followed the bloody trend of July, with nine foreign troops killed in the first two days. Three more Americans and a French soldier were killed on Saturday.
CIVILIAN, MILITARY DEATHS UP
At least 71 foreign troops were killed in July. This included 41 U.S. troops, well above the previous monthly high of 26 in September 2008, and 22 British soldiers.
And the United Nations said on Friday 1,013 civilians had been killed between January and June this year, up from 818 in the same period last year. The Taliban and other insurgents were responsible for 59 percent of civilian deaths, a U.N. human rights report said.
Attacks this year had already reached their worst level since the removal of the Taliban and escalated after U.S. Marines and British troops launched offensives in southern Helmand province last month.
Military commanders had said a spike in casualties could be expected during the operations.
Helmand, a sprawling province of deserts, lush river valleys and mountains, has long been a Taliban stronghold and the source of most of the opium that funds the insurgency.
The offensives are the first operations under U.S. President Barack Obama's new regional strategy to defeat the Taliban and its militant Islamist allies and stabilize Afghanistan.
There have been a series of election-related attacks across the country, with one of President Hamid Karzai's campaign convoys ambushed in southeastern Ghazni on Saturday. A bodyguard was killed and a candidate for provincial elections was wounded.
The election is seen as a test of Obama's new strategy, as well as Kabul's ability to stage a legitimate and credible poll.
Karzai is seen as a clear front-runner in a field of 36 contenders. Poor security appears as one of the few election threats to the man who has ruled since 2001 and won the country's first direct vote in 2004.
A low voter turn-out in the ethnic Pashtun south, Karzai's traditional power base, could raise the possibility of a second run-off vote if no candidate gets more than 50 percent in the first round.
This would then open the way for a consolidation of rivals behind one of Karzai's main challengers, former foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah or former finance minister Ashraf Ghani.
(Editing by Myra MacDonald)
.... Angry residents brought the bodies to the provincial capital Kandahar, a heartland of insurgent activity, to show officials. The incident could stir instability two weeks before a presidential election. Villagers identified the dead as civilians -- three boys and a man from one family killed late on Tuesday. "They were civilians killed by the air strike while fast asleep," said Jan Mohammad, a village elder and one of the group who brought the bodies to Kandahar.... A Reuters correspondent who saw the bodies said two appeared to be teenage or pre-teen boys. Boys of that age sometimes accompany fighters in Afghanistan. The other two bodies were mutilated beyond recognition....
.... At 1:30 a.m. on Aug. 5, International Security Assistance Forces identified four insurgents in the Arghandab District in Kandahar province. The insurgents were in open ground with no residential areas in the vicinity. The insurgents were carrying weapons and plastic jugs and were identified as possibly emplacing improvised explosive devices in an area known for IED attacks. ISAF engaged the insurgents with rockets and small arms fire from a helicopter, killing the insurgents. A large secondary explosion was observed at the point of impact indicating explosive material was in the insurgent's possession. No bombs were dropped....
Canadian troops have moved into several villages to the southwest of Kandahar City in the past few days to live among the population and be much closer to the heart of the Taliban insurgency.
The move to have troops dwell in small communities, such as Zhalakhan and Baladay, coincides with orders by U.S. Army General Stanley McChrystal, the new commander of all NATO forces in Afghanistan appointed by President Barack Obama, to focus on populated areas in order to separate the Taliban from the people.
The four-star general's directive to "clear, hold and build" fits with training that the Quebec-based Royal 22nd Regiment Battle Group did in Canada before deploying to Afghanistan this spring.
"The population is the key," said Maj. Stephane Briand, the battle group's chief of operations. "We go into hot spots to render the enemy uncomfortable. When we hold that terrain they must move somewhere else."
The strategy had already reaped some benefits, according to Capt. William Girard, the Van Doos' plans officer.
"When we live with villagers we gain their confidence," he said. "They come, for example, and tell us if the insurgents had come to them in the night."
The latest initiatives in the volatile Zhari District, including an operation that ended Sunday that involved more than 500 Afghan and Canadian forces [emphasis added], are part of a fast operational pace on which Canada's Brig.-Gen. Jon Vance has had the Van Doos and his other troops since before the onset of the searing Afghan summer several months ago. Among items seized from the Taliban in the past few days are suicide vests, material for making bombs and what was described as "a high-quality communications system."
In all, there have been 38 Task Force Kandahar-directed major operations since early this year [emphasis added]. The Van Doos and such other troops as combat engineers, artillery gunners and a reconnaissance squadron from Quebec, as well as tanks from Alberta, have launched two dozen operations involving 100 or more soldiers at a time, as well as more than 50 smaller operations.
"We started very early with a high tempo of large operations to try to knock the insurgency off its game as it tried to transition into what we call the fighting season," Vance said. "We selected large operations because we wish to ensure that the insurgents would flee and required sufficient forces to deal with that . . .
"The nature of the insurgency now is such that it (is) in positions quite close to population centres or in them and we need to work quickly to the get them out and relieve the population."
Vance's chief of operations, Lt.-Col. Mike Patrick, said that troops who once "chased the Taliban," are now more focused on defending the population. This requires operations where the Canadians "have to be more of a driver" than the enemy is.
With the Van Doos swarming parts of Zhari the Taliban "probably is not thinking it is such a good area to be set up in," the colonel said.
"We have had one operation after another because we need to move constantly to force the enemy," Girard said. "If reports indicate that we have affected their leadership, we need to exploit that before the leaders are replaced."
Several new wrinkles in the military situation in Kandahar had permitted the Van Doos to be more uptempo than the six Canadian battle groups which preceded them. Forward operation bases are now guarded by private security contractors, a U.S. infantry battalion is now working alongside the Van Doos and the arrival of Canadian helicopters early in the year makes it easier to move troops and supplies around.
These changes have allowed the Van Doos to operate company-sized missions with 120 or 130 men, rather than half that number as had often been the case previously [emphasis added].
"General Vance told us in Wainwright, (Alta.) that he did not want our soldiers in the FOBs (forward operating bases)," Briand said. "He wanted us all to be outside and that is how our companies live now."..
KANDAHAR AIR FIELD, Afghanistan — More than 100 soldiers in the brigade studied Arabic for 10 months. Their officers boned up on Iraq by reading dozens of books.
Then, five months ago, the 5,000 troops of the U.S. Army's 5th Stryker Brigade were told they were headed to Afghanistan instead.
The Obama administration's decision to switch America's main battlefront from Iraq to Afghanistan is more than a geographic shift. While there are similarities between the two Muslim nations, there are also major differences in language, culture and topography.
The Fort Lewis, Wash.-based Stryker brigade, which arrived in southern Afghanistan last month as part of the U.S. troop surge, is among those scrambling to adapt.
There was only time to give about 50 soldiers a nine-week crash course in Pashto, the main language of southern Afghanistan...
Soldiers who've gone through the language course are briefing their comrades on how to interact with the local population – part of the U.S. strategy of building ties to the community.
Dazey has told the men in his squadron to avoid talking to women, or even looking at them – a cursory glance at a burqa-covered woman can be seen by her husband as a lewd come-on.
"The Pashtuns, we've been told the culture is a lot like the Arabic culture except it's on steroids," he said.
Perhaps most importantly, engaging Afghans – and the Pashtuns in particular – requires a different approach.
"Afghanistan is more of a tribal-based society," said Lt. Col. William Clark, commander of the Stryker brigade's 8th Squadron, 1st Cavalry Regiment. "There are more informal leaders you have to recognize."
Conversely, the brigade faces a tightly organized Taliban structure in Kandahar with commanders and even spokespeople, in contrast to the loosely connected insurgency of Iraq.
The Stryker brigade, named after its fast-moving tank-like assault vehicles, is meant to be a next-generation fighting force equipped with advanced communication technology and soldiers skilled in both fighting and peace-building...
The Stryker vehicles are flown over. The operating bases have to be built and no one knows for sure how the Taliban will respond in an area where they've never been given much of a fight [emphasis added]. This will be the first deployment for the brigade and for many of its soldiers, so many are studying up to make sure they're ready for a different theater with a lot more responsibility...
The United States will not meet its goals in Afghanistan without a major increase in planned spending on development and civilian reconstruction next year, the U.S. ambassador in Kabul has told the State Department.
In a cable sent to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Ambassador Karl W. Eikenberry said an additional $2.5 billion in nonmilitary spending will be needed for 2010, about 60 percent more than the amount President Obama has requested from Congress. The increase is needed "if we are to show progress in the next 14 months," Eikenberry wrote in the cable, according to sources who have seen it.
Obama has asked for $68 billion in Defense Department spending in Afghanistan next year, an amount that for the first time would exceed U.S. military expenditures in Iraq. Spending on civilian governance and development programs has doubled under the Obama administration [emphasis added], to $200 million a month -- equal to the monthly rate in Iraq during the zenith of spending on nonmilitary projects there.
The State Department has reacted cautiously to Eikenberry's assessment, sent to Clinton in late June, even as senior officials say the administration is prepared to spend what is needed to succeed. The 2010 budget includes about $4.1 billion in State Department funding for nonmilitary purposes...
Although spending on civilian programs pales beside the military budget, Obama has pledged substantial increases in U.S. civilian personnel and development funds, focusing on agricultural development and rule of law. The size of the U.S. Embassy is scheduled to grow this year to 976 U.S. government civilians in Kabul and outside the capital, from 562 at the end of 2008 [emphasis added]...
MIANPOSHTEH, Afghanistan -- The new U.S. strategy for Afghanistan, as articulated in military headquarters and congressional hearing rooms, puts the emphasis not on killing Taliban fighters but on winning over the local people. But in this highly contested swath of Helmand province, Sgt. Anibal Paz's squad is likely to be ambushed before he has time to sit down for tea.
The sergeants' war that Paz fights is often craftier and more complex than the war mapped out by generals, and it's always dirtier and bloodier. Young Americans and Afghans set out to taunt and lure their foes, then try to outsmart or outgun them. The running clashes that result send villagers fleeing their fields, hampering the U.S. Marines' overarching mission of making the local population feel secure.
Paz, 26, of Fall River, Mass., and his fellow troops in Echo Company, 2nd battalion, 8th Marines arrived by helicopter in this cluster of farming villages in early July and seized a crossroads in the Helmand River valley where the Taliban until then had free rein. The Taliban valued the intersection as a place to organize, train and move fighters, as well as weapons, north from the Pakistan border into population centers across Helmand and beyond.
Now Taliban fighters are resisting the American advance, by seeking to inflict U.S. casualties and thwart Marine efforts to win over villagers. The elusive insurgents blend easily into the population, invisible to Marines until they pick up a weapon. They use villagers to spot and warn of U.S. troop movements, take up positions in farmers' homes and fields, and attack Marines from spots with ready escape routes.
The Marines, under strict rules to protect civilians, must wait for insurgents to attack and then attempt to ensnare them. Limited in their use of airstrikes and artillery -- because of the danger to civilians and because aircraft often frighten the Taliban away -- Marine riflemen must use themselves as bait and then engage in the riskier task of pursuing insurgents on foot...
These scenes show three separate firefights in southern Afghanistan, where Marines have been clashing regularly with Taliban forces. British troops and Afghan National Army are also fighting in the area.
More than a year has passed since an Afghan police commander turned on coalition forces and helped insurgents carry out a surprise attack that killed nine Americans, wounded more than 30 United States and Afghan troops and nearly resulted in the loss of an allied outpost in one of the deadliest engagements of the war.
Within days of the attack, Army historians and tactical analysts arrived in eastern Afghanistan to review the debacle near Wanat, interviewing soldiers who survived the intense battle, in which outnumbered Americans exchanged gunfire for more than four hours with insurgents, often at distances closer than 50 feet.
Now, that effort to harvest lessons from the firefight of July 13, 2008, has contributed to a new battlefield manual that will be delivered over coming days to Army units joining the fight in Afghanistan with the troop increase ordered by President Obama.
The handbook, “Small-Unit Operations in Afghanistan,” strikes a tone of respect for the Taliban and other insurgent groups, which are acknowledged to be extremely experienced fighters; even more, American soldiers are warned that the insurgents rapidly adapt to shifts in tactics.
In page after page, the handbook draws on lessons from Wanat and other missions, some successful and some that resulted in death and injury for American and allied forces. The manual can be read as an effort to push the nuances of the complex counterinsurgency fight now under way in Afghanistan down from the generals and colonels to newly minted privates as well as to the sergeants and junior officers who lead small units into combat.
Copies of the 123-page handbook, produced by the Center for Army Lessons Learned,
http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/call/index.asp
are being distributed throughout the service and are available to NATO allies and other nations with troops in Afghanistan. A copy was provided in advance to The New York Times by an official involved in the distribution, who said consideration was being given to a broader public release.
The manual includes a chapter titled “Cultural Engagements,” offering guidance to small-unit leaders on building relationships with wavering village elders and trust among distrustful village residents — a process that cannot be left to senior officers who may be back at headquarters...
[Canadian Army Lessons Learned Centre
http://armyapp.dnd.ca/allc-clra/default_e.asp ]
CANBERRA - Australia has been advised to increase its military commitment to Afghanistan as it slips below Washington's horizon in the new priorities of President Barack Obama's Democrat Administration.
Reflecting similar United States messages that saw New Zealand agree to send the SAS back to the deepening war against the Taleban, Canberra has been told that it is not pulling its weight and should do more.
Australia has been told that while its alliance with America remains strong, the "man of steel" bonds between former President George W. Bush and former Prime Minister John Howard have weakened.
"Absent a huge crisis in Indonesia, the Taiwan Strait or perhaps Korea, Australians are unlikely to become the key ally of the US in handling a major issue," Dr Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Brookings Institution, said...
http://www.brookings.edu/experts/o/ohanlonm.aspx
"In theory, if America can muster 200,000 troops for two wars, a country of Australia's size should proportionately be able to find 5000 troops."
Even with an increase that will lift Canberra's commitment to about 1550 troops in Afghanistan, putting the nation among the top 10 of the more than 40 coalition partners, Canberra was still punching beneath its weight.
"This situation should be addressed seriously by Australians," O'Hanlon said. "If they consider the Afghanistan war to be a reasonable enterprise with reasonable goals and a true importance, they should not be content with their present contribution."
O'Hanlon said Obama would probably be too polite to ask for another increase of any size, but a deployment closer to Canada's 2800 soldiers should be within Canberra's reach, and could partially replace Canadian troops when they were withdrawn in 2011 [emphasis added]...
RELATED STORY: Canadian forces take ‘ink spot’ approach
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=64143
ZALAKHAN, Afghanistan — Dusk was closing fast on a patrol of Canadian soldiers as they cleared a sector of this bombed-out, abandoned village. Suddenly, the puttering of a motorbike was heard in the distance.
The sound came as a surprise. The motorcycle was the first non-military vehicle they had heard since they moved in three days earlier to set up a new outpost here, about six miles southwest of the provincial capital of Kandahar.
The patrol — a group of French-Canadian soldiers from the Royal 22nd Regiment, known as the “Van Doos” — was split between two high-walled mud brick compounds on either side of a narrow dirt road that ran through the village.
“Take cover, boys,” the patrol leader shouted, as he and two other soldiers ducked behind a high metal gate into the compound on the right.
With the near-constant shelling of artillery in the area over the previous days, it was a safe bet that the rider was not just passing through. Chinese-made Honda motorcycles are the Taliban’s favorite method of transporting fighters and supplies around the Afghan battlefield.
With the sound of the motorcycle now just outside, the patrol leader and two soldiers sprang from their hiding place and blocked the road.
Two men were on a red Honda less than 50 meters away. A third followed on a second motorcycle just behind them. The soldiers yelled for the men to stop. The men jumped from the motorcycles and began to run.
The Canadian soldiers opened fire. Two of the men dashed through a gate in a mud wall to the left and into a field before they were cut down by other troops. The third man died in a hail of fire before he even made it off the road. He fell face down in the dirt and did not move again. The fusillade had lasted less than 30 seconds.
Meanwhile, automatic weapons fire had erupted from a clump of trees about 100 meters to the south. A second burst came from across the field to the east. An explosion thundered, as a soldier fired a grenade. The enemy fire stopped as suddenly as it had begun.
Three soldiers ran through the blasted interior of the first compound and came out through another gate, closer to where one of the dead men lay. Two soldiers stepped out warily, one of them pointing his rifle at the tree line to the south.
The patrol leader called for an airstrike. The first of a half-dozen 155 mm artillery rounds came in less than a minute later, exploding in shrieking airbursts to the south and the east, where the soldiers believed they were taking fire. The shells were followed by an equal number of white phosphorous smoke rounds, which also exploded in midair.
As darkness fell, a team of combat engineers moved forward to check the motorcycles and the bodies of the three men for booby traps. There were none. The other soldiers cheered and bumped fists when the engineers announced had found a 60 mm mortar tube, a base plate and four high-explosive rounds. The three men had definitely been Taliban.
One of the fighters was still alive. He cried in pain as a medic treated his wounds. The patrol leader called for a medevac helicopter.
“It’s been a good day, huh?” a sergeant said. His name, like the others, is withheld because of task force ban on identifying troops who kill or injure insurgents or civilians.
“Yeah, they were probably going to fire those mortars on us,” said another soldier. “We assured ourselves of a good sleep tonight.”
The wailing of the wounded fighter continued. He repeated the same thing over and over in a ragged rhythm. A soldier asked an Afghan interpreter what the words meant.
“I don’t know,” the interpreter said. “He is saying nothing.”
Finally, he grew quieter and then the crying ceased altogether. He, too, was dead. The patrol leader canceled the medevac.
The U.S. commander in Afghanistan will not make a specific request for more troops when he submits a review of the situation there in the coming weeks, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said Thursday.
Instead, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal will assess conditions on the ground and make recommendations based on whether the mix and number of forces he has been allotted -- 68,000 by the end of the year -- is sufficient to execute U.S. strategy there, Gates told reporters at a Pentagon briefing held with Joint Chiefs of Staff Vice Chairman Gen. James Cartwright.
"We've made clear to General McChrystal that he is free to ask for what he needs," Gates said. But "any future resource request will be considered separately and subsequent to his assessment of the security situation [emphasis added]."
At a recent meeting with McChrystal in Brussels, Gates told the commander to concentrate on tasks that needed to be performed and the type of troops necessary to accomplish them rather than specific numbers, according to senior military officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss internal Pentagon deliberations.
With a focus on "troops-to-task" ratios, McChrystal is expected to provide a breakdown of future strategy -- including increased training requirements for Afghan forces -- that officials said could require at least 15,000 additional U.S. troops next year [emphasis added]. Obama approved the deployment of 21,000 troops this year, 6,000 of whom have not yet arrived in Afghanistan.
"What he's assessing is, have I -- have I got it laid down right?" Cartwright said of McChrystal, who took command in Afghanistan two months ago...
Gates previously expressed concern that the size of the international force in Afghanistan -- including about 30,000 non-U.S. troops from NATO and other allied countries -- could reach a "tipping point" whereby Afghans will turn against them. "I think that most Afghans see us as there to help them and see us as their partner," Gates said Thursday. "I just worry that we don't know what the size of the international presence, military presence, might be that would begin to change that."
Gates said that coalition forces "have to show progress over the course of the next year." Asked how long U.S. combat forces would be needed in Afghanistan, he said it was "unpredictable" and "perhaps a few years," and he emphasized plans to sharply increase recruitment and training of Afghan security forces so they could take over.
Over the longer term, Gates said that even if security is achieved, progress in building Afghanistan's economy and government institutions remains "a decades-long enterprise in a country that has been through 30 years of war and has as high an illiteracy rate as Afghanistan does and low level of economic development." The United States and international partners, he said, "are committed to that side of the equation for an indefinite period of time [emphasis added]."..