I'll believe it when I see it.
The removal and replacement of the senior JAG officers suggests a desire to shape what "legal" is.I would like to think they follow legal orders. If there is a legal order to attack canada i would expect them to attack. When the military starts ignoring the civilian chain of command then you have problems.
Go AT-4, 84mm warhead versus 66mmwhat we need is more AT, even locally produced M72EC Mk2 would go along way (which we are switching to the EC2 already)
Canada cannot hope to fight the US, it’s just math and mass.
AT-4 CS HP upto 500mm pen, M72EC Mk1 450mm, EC mk2 300mm of pen. M72EC1 also is cheaper to produce than AT-4.Go AT-4, 84mm warhead versus 66mm
But those are in extremis weapons, you really need a stock pile of Javelins or a reasonable hand drawn facsimile thereof.
I agree to a point.I would like to think they follow legal orders. If there is a legal order to attack canada i would expect them to attack. When the military starts ignoring the civilian chain of command then you have problems.
of course. "Shoot those unarmed civillians" is an obviously illegal order, but how is "plan to invade our neighbour and activate those plans upon the president's orders" illegal?I agree to a point.
Command at all levels need to oppose orders that are Unlawful. Especially at the Joints Chief of Staff Command.
Actually only Congress can declare war but there are few escape clauses.of course. "Shoot those unarmed civillians" is an obviously illegal order, but how is "plan to invade our neighbour and activate those plans upon the president's orders" illegal?
How about the Iveco LMV the British adopted as the Panther? Maybe even have a trusted Canadian manufacturer like Western Star build it domestically.Great more Brinks trucks that have zero fucking value on a battlefield.
A commercial Ford 550 chassis isn't something to build an armored vehicle on.
Good I hope so, subs, tanks, spgs? Bring it on.
2:07PM
Poland wants 100,000 volunteers to undergo military training in 2027
Donald Tusk has said he wants 100,000 volunteers to undergo military training in 2027.
“The most important thing for us is that every person interested can participate in such training no later than 2026. And that is a difficult task, but I know it is doable,” the Polish prime minister said ahead of a government sitting.
“In 2027 we will achieve the ability to train 100,000 volunteers per year... Apart from the professional army and beyond the Territorial Defence Force, we must de facto build an army of reservists and our actions will serve this purpose.”
Galvanised by Russia’s invasion of neighbouring Ukraine three years ago, Poland now spends a higher proportion of GDP on defence than any other Mato member.
Age - 18 for voluntary service |
Conscription - Yes, for men. |
Available for Military Service - 2,605,137, age 18–49 (2023) |
Fit for Military Service - 2,107,794, age 18–49 (2023) |
Reaching Military Age Annually - 76,970[2] (2023) |
Active - 21.000 military & 4.638 civilian (2024)[3] |
Reserve - 12,000 + 51,000 volunteers in the Home Guard |
Deployed - 800 (2024)[4] |
Maybe even these to replace the Milcot and G-Wagen.Good I hope so, subs, tanks, spgs? Bring it on.
Denmark - Pop'n 5,947,000
Age - 18 for voluntary service Conscription - Yes, for men. Available for Military Service - 2,605,137, age 18–49 (2023) Fit for Military Service - 2,107,794, age 18–49 (2023) Reaching Military Age Annually - 76,970[2] (2023) Active - 21.000 military & 4.638 civilian (2024)[3] Reserve - 12,000 + 51,000 volunteers in the Home Guard Deployed - 800 (2024)[4]
40,100,000 - Canada
14,210,000 Fit for Service
519,000 Reaching Military Age Annually
31,260 Military Civilians
141,500 Active Military
80,880 Reserve Military
344,000 Homeguard (Territorial Defence Force - Unpaid Volunteers)A
Meanwhile, in Denmark... the weak cork in the Baltic bottle
Denmark’s defense falls flat for NATO standards
While the Danish military struggles to adapt to a changing security situation, recent exposés have cast doubts on whether Denmark can live up to its global role as a competent and reliable military ally.
It seemed like a proud moment for the Danish Armed Forces, after media reports of guns that don't fire and moldy barracks.
More than a dozen crewmembers eye various screens dotting the control room of the Iver Huitfeldt battleship with predatorial focus, in a video released by the Danish Armed Forces.
Outside, four armed drones — launched separately over the course of an hour by the Yemeni Houthi militant group — approach the frigate in the Red Sea on a Saturday morning in early April.
A white, oval-shaped object breezing above the dark waters is maneuvered into the center of the crosshairs on screen.
“Puff, puff, puff, puff!”
The monitor lights up white before a drone crashes into the dark ocean.
Victorious yells and applause — the routine repeats itself as the crew downs each of the four drones.
“I am proud that the ship and crew have done what they were sent out to do in a professional manner, namely, to protect free navigation,” said Flemming Lentfer, then chief of the Danish Armed Forces, in a press release shortly after the incident.
But what was crafted as a success story would soon turn catastrophic for the chief more than three years into his tenure, in a sign of the state of Denmark's armed forces.
At a news conference in early April, Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen announced the departure of Army Chief Flemming Lentfer after reports that the military's news release left out important details about the downing of Houthi drones.
Quoting an anonymous source from the institution, Danish military niche news site Olfi reported that the frigate couldn't launch its defense missile system due to a radar failure.
For 30 minutes, the Iver Huitfeldt and its crew were nearly defenseless during a combat mission. Poulsen first learned of this from Olfi weeks after the incident, with the Danish press questioning why no military leaders had briefed him about the dangerous situation.
“Other countries must look in amazement and say: What is happening?” said Jesper Korsgaard Hansen, chairman of Centralforeningen for Stampersonel, Denmark’s biggest union for military personnel, to newswire Ritzau.
“How can it be that the Danes can't figure it out when you can figure it out everywhere else?” he said about solving ongoing problems facing the armed forces.
The Danish Armed Forces are not in the best shape.
In recent years, Danish media have exposed various issues in the institution.
Mold-filled walls, toilets that can’t flush and showers without hot water haunt barracks around the country, broadcaster DR reported in January.
Danish inspection vessels have patrolled the Arctic for 15 years equipped with cannons that can't shoot due to an incomplete weapon system, freedom of information requests showed.
And NATO has criticized Denmark’s efforts to meet the military alliance's standards — especially the lack of military investment.
![]()
Denmark’s defense falls flat for NATO standards
While the Danish military struggles to adapt to a changing security situation, recent exposés have cast doubts on whether Denmark can live up to its global role as a competent and reliable military ally.www.courthousenews.com
Convert all Class A positions to Class B positions and you'll get about another 10,000 full timers on strength almost overnight![]()
I would rather go to a larger caliber round get away from the US mandated NATO round myself if we were building a national firearms supply for Militia training for all.
When they talked about opening it up from 2 passengers to up to 12, I knew then that Roshel will win. Makes sense. It does its job perfectly fine and is made here.
When they talked about opening it up from 2 passengers to up to 12, I knew then that Roshel will win. Makes sense. It does its job perfectly fine and is made here.