I'll believe it when I see it.
Related to that...
Can we really have the CV90 and still keep the lights on over at GDLSC?Related to that...
![]()
U.S. GDLS XM30 Infantry Combat Vehicle nears Bradley replacement after critical design review success
U.S. GDLS XM30 Infantry Combat Vehicle nears Bradley replacement after critical design review successwww.armyrecognition.com
The gun was terrible by all accounts, not sure why they didn't go with a standard M2, or a 20mm.TC hated them and the ultra crappy MG that went into them. Plus if hit with APDS would shear off and take half the TC with it. The idea might not be bad, but that version not so much.
Can we really have the CV90 and still keep the lights on over at GDLSC?
the programme's modular design allows the vehicle to be adapted for various missions, such as troop transport, medical evacuations, logistical support, reconnaissance, and combat operations. This flexibility ensures that the vehicle can meet the varied operational needs of the participating states.
Well honestly with solely a binary choice I’d rather go for the XM-30 option to keep GDLSC-London open.Can we really have the CV90 and still keep the lights on over at GDLSC?
Put all those home based systems in a RV or a boat and you will see how well they are made.Why? Does your car typically fail due to mechanical or electronic faults? Does your household have a problem with the availability rate of smart phones or the home entertainment system?
Yup. There's a reason 'police package' cars are a thing and why the 'K-car' days of the 1980s didn't go so well; and why service duty laptops are all Toughbooks or another 'ruggedized' line.Put all those home based systems in a RV or a boat and you will see how well they are made.
I gave my Toughbook to our Department IT who promptly broke it......Yup. There's a reason 'police package' cars are a thing and why the 'K-car' days of the 1980s didn't go so well; and why service duty laptops are all Toughbooks or another 'ruggedized' line.
I have to ask: have you worked in a modern tank or are you making assumptions?Which is fine, but an independent commander sight doesn't come close to the SA that one gets from having your head up in the commanders hatch, especially on the move. As you know, sights are used in conjunction with your eyes and to zoom, but scanning tends to be more effective with your eyes.
My tank experience is extremely limited as a reservist but have plenty of experience in other AFVs in the CAF fleet, TLAV, TAPV, LAV, Bison, etc. Talk to any tanker and they're hatches up as much as possible. Hell, look at pictures of the GWOT and you'll find plenty of Abrams or Leo commanders hatches up outside the wire.I have to ask: have you worked in a modern tank or are you making assumptions?
The Germans were very good a picking off heads sticking out of hatches.
I’d suggest that was due to the very limited threat of indirect fire.My tank experience is extremely limited as a reservist but have plenty of experience in other AFVs in the CAF fleet, TLAV, TAPV, LAV, Bison, etc. Talk to any tanker and they're hatches up as much as possible. Hell, look at pictures of the GWOT and you'll find plenty of Abrams or Leo commanders hatches up outside the wire.
Which of the above are AFV's?...AFVs in the CAF fleet, TLAV, TAPV, LAV, Bison,...
All of them by definition? Are you thinking IFV? Then it'd be the LAV.Which of the above are AFV's?
I’d suggest that was due to the very limited threat of indirect fire.
The US lost 1800 tank crew in the entire war. Funny enough most injuries to British tankers was head injuries, which the US did not suffer because they had a proper helmet and not a beret.I have to ask: have you worked in a modern tank or are you making assumptions?
The Germans were very good a picking off heads sticking out of hatches.
The British tankers actually preferred using their helmets as decoys since the Brodie helmet wasn't a good AFV helmet. Most American tankers didn't wear the steel pot, they wore a leather Rawlings (the baseball glove company) crash helmet. Good for impact, but wouldnt do anything for spall or splinters. Those helmets in Canadian service is where the name zipperhead comes from as the stitching would leave marks. They were rarely worn by Canadian crews. I actually own one, they're super cool.The US lost 1800 tank crew in the entire war. Funny enough most injuries to British tankers was head injuries, which the US did not suffer because they had a proper helmet and not a beret.
Have to admit I get a chuckle out of Ukrainian tankers wearing the Soviet tank crew helmet in Abrams and Leopards.
for a tracked second line vehicle how aboutLast Patria offering of note (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark, Germany, Belgium, France, Spain and Greece)
FAMOUS ATV (11.5 to 15 tonnes amphibious)
View attachment 93728
An upgraded MTLB as an alternative to the Bv series of vehicles.![]()
FAMOUS programme | Patria
Patria – the industrial coordinator of the FAMOUS programmewww.patriagroup.com
![]()
FAMOUS in Paris
With many Finnish troops relying on tracked carriers, the FDF has long acknowledged their limitations and identified the need for a replacement. Patria has now developed the FAMOUS ATV, offering im…corporalfrisk.com
A tracked Second Line Vehicle.
....
Finland - 5.6 million people. But highly motivated. Like the Swedes.
That was the "helmet" I was referring to, the Chieftain did a excellent bit on tank crew fatalities and injuries in the US army in WWII.The British tankers actually preferred using their helmets as decoys since the Brodie helmet wasn't a good AFV helmet. Most American tankers didn't wear the steel pot, they wore a leather Rawlings (the baseball glove company) crash helmet. Good for impact, but wouldnt do anything for spall or splinters. Those helmets in Canadian service is where the name zipperhead comes from as the stitching would leave marks. They were rarely worn by Canadian crews. I actually own one, they're super cool.