• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

G7 Kananaskis 2025

foresterab said:
Had not heard of the Guns and Bonds part. Something to consider on a calmer day.

Just thinking of how communities used to self fund planes/tanks/ships in WW2, how local farmers used to fund raise for local infrastructure projects like schools and halls, and now today we lack some of those mechanisms. A person can still donate lump sum money but there's' nothing like Victory Bonds/War Bonds/CSB's that allow for an investment in the countries future the same way.

Some of this is a moral position but I also learned a lot of about basic investing concepts via the parents taking my down to the bank to decide which bonds to renew and/or purchase as a kid (a token amount in hindsight) but important financial education was learned young.
Click to expand...

The government loves the flexibility that comes with General Revenues. It permits the allocation of funds by the government of the day.

Defence Bonds, Arctic Bonds, Energy Bonds, would all have merit IMO.
 
foresterab said:
Had not heard of the Guns and Bonds part. Something to consider on a calmer day.

Just thinking of how communities used to self fund planes/tanks/ships in WW2, how local farmers used to fund raise for local infrastructure projects like schools and halls, and now today we lack some of those mechanisms. A person can still donate lump sum money but there's' nothing like Victory Bonds/War Bonds/CSB's that allow for an investment in the countries future the same way.

Some of this is a moral position but I also learned a lot of about basic investing concepts via the parents taking my down to the bank to decide which bonds to renew and/or purchase as a kid (a token amount in hindsight) but important financial education was learned young.
Click to expand...

As I recall, War Bond drives - as well as other propaganda efforts - were attempts to keep the population engaged in a potentially civilization ending conflict in which they were deeply uninterested.

One of the great fallacies of WW1 and WW2 is that national populations, especially in North America, were enthusiastically behind the war effort, but they weren't and that was a problem.
 
One of the joys of being a bit of a history nerd is when some Granola crunching granny bitched to me about funding the military and said: "They should have a bake sales to raise funds like everyone else" . I replied "Most of the armouries you see were partly funded by such events back in the day". She was taken aback that average Canadian would view their military in a positive light. How much local support and effort was a factor in the government authorizing units and armouries back in the day.
 
GK .Dundas said:
If ever they're were an example of a self inflicted crisis it has the conscription crisis of '17 .
Letting the Orange Lodge cronies of the MND run the draft board in Quebec probably didn't help
It was also the gift that kept on giving see the Crisis of '44.
Click to expand...
La Loi 17 around that time (1912) in an effort to culturally assimilate Francophones and deny them educational rights didn’t help.
 
Kilted said:
By final warning measures, does that mean that they would have shot it down if it didn't comply?
Click to expand...
Yeah that’s pretty much exactly what it means.

ADATS almost got to splash a Dash-7/8 in K country at the 2002 G-7. It was the first one since 9/11, and some folks always seem to want to push the timeline for a boundary…
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Edward Campbell
Promoting Canada's Interests: A New G7, G20 and G35
Replies
4
Views
5K
a_majoor
a_majoor
Yrys
Nicolas Sarkozy challenges France's version of history - BBC News
2
Replies
20
Views
16K
Servicepub
Servicepub
Cloud Cover
PM Harper's Foreign policy speech: 'Reviving Canadian leadership in the world'
Replies
16
Views
9K
vonGarvin
vonGarvin
Bert
The Re-emergence of Germany
2
Replies
26
Views
15K
FormerEnlisted
F
Back
Top