• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Israeli strikes on Iran (2024, 2025, etc.)

And it looks like the administration got a grip on DNI Gabbard. She’s singing the company song about Iranian nuclear ambitions now:


Major media has now picked up and is reporting the bomber moves.

Re ; The current DNI for some reason I keep flashing back to that scene in Blazing Saddles when Mel Brook's character announces "Gentlemen, we've got to do something to protect our phony baloney jobs !"
I believe Ms. Gabbard has just done that .
 
So they are going with decision-based evidence making? Sounds quite....LPC...or Gulf War II
Indeed. I’m just looking at the signs, not speaking to the rightness or wrongness.

At this point it seems likely the U.S. will hit Fordow. The night it happens, Israel will have everything up, absolutely saturating the airspace and suppressing everything imaginable. Anything emitting radar will die.

What I can’t even come up with a guess at is how they deal with the Bushehr nuclear power plant. It’s literally an operating reactor, and happens to produce plutonium as a product of its fuel cycle. There’s no fast AND non-disastrous way to end that plant.

If this goes, this is going to be the most dangerous B-2 strike in history. But as a buddy of mine pointed out, if they can pull it off, it signals “we could have hit anything. We could have killed you but we didn’t”, and everything else postured to the theatre could be a show of force to deter response and to allow US involvement to stay limited to a single precise hit.

Hopefully there’s still an offramp, and hopefully Iran takes it. But the noises coming from their diplomats in the wake of meeting Europe are not encouraging.
 
So they are going with decision-based evidence making? Sounds quite....LPC...or Gulf War II

michael che snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
... If this goes, this is going to be the most dangerous B-2 strike in history. But as a buddy of mine pointed out, if they can pull it off, it signals “we could have hit anything. We could have killed you but we didn’t”, and everything else postured to the theatre could be a show of force to deter response and to allow US involvement to stay limited to a single precise hit ...
I still get a bit of this kind of vibe from the idea ....
CoupleOfBunkerBusters20minuteAdventure.jpg
... though I hope I'm wrong if this is how it plays out. Happy to see IRN nukeless, but I suspect it'll also invite the "if you helped break it, how you gonna help fix it?" narrative.
 
If I was designing a concealed fortress I would ensure that there was an alternative entrance/exit dug that led to a second area well removed from my primary facility. The Persians aren't fools, they were aware when they started that Israel at the very least would probably go after them hammer and tong and would have planned accordingly.
Someone had to build them. One wonders who, and where the records are.
 
Latest from ISW ....
  • "Israel continued its strike campaign targeting Iranian air defenses, missile forces, and nuclear sites. These sites include one in Esfahan that produced centrifuges.
  • Israel struck and killed senior officers in the IRGC Aerospace Force and Quds Force, which may impose a temporary disruption upon Iranian command-and-control.
  • An Iranian drone struck a populated area in Israel for the first time during this war. This is not indicative of a systematic breakdown in Israeli air defenses. Integrated air defense systems are not perfect, and some projectiles will impact their targets.
  • Iran conducted another ballistic missile attack targeting Israel. It consisted of five missiles, all of which the IDF intercepted."
 
Indeed. I’m just looking at the signs, not speaking to the rightness or wrongness.

At this point it seems likely the U.S. will hit Fordow. The night it happens, Israel will have everything up, absolutely saturating the airspace and suppressing everything imaginable. Anything emitting radar will die.

What I can’t even come up with a guess at is how they deal with the Bushehr nuclear power plant. It’s literally an operating reactor, and happens to produce plutonium as a product of its fuel cycle. There’s no fast AND non-disastrous way to end that plant.

If this goes, this is going to be the most dangerous B-2 strike in history. But as a buddy of mine pointed out, if they can pull it off, it signals “we could have hit anything. We could have killed you but we didn’t”, and everything else postured to the theatre could be a show of force to deter response and to allow US involvement to stay limited to a single precise hit.

Hopefully there’s still an offramp, and hopefully Iran takes it. But the noises coming from their diplomats in the wake of meeting Europe are not encouraging.

Does the B-2 need air superiority?
 
Latest from ISW ....
  • "Israel continued its strike campaign targeting Iranian air defenses, missile forces, and nuclear sites. These sites include one in Esfahan that produced centrifuges.
  • Israel struck and killed senior officers in the IRGC Aerospace Force and Quds Force, which may impose a temporary disruption upon Iranian command-and-control.
  • An Iranian drone struck a populated area in Israel for the first time during this war. This is not indicative of a systematic breakdown in Israeli air defenses. Integrated air defense systems are not perfect, and some projectiles will impact their targets.
  • Iran conducted another ballistic missile attack targeting Israel. It consisted of five missiles, all of which the IDF intercepted."

Well, apparently, one ballistic missile made it through!

 
Does the B-2 need air superiority?

Fair question. I would think that, if they go, they’ll want to have the area flooded with enough friendly air that anything that even thinks of emitting radar does quickly. Those assets will need air superiority.

There will also be the brief moments of vulnerability when the B2s open their bomb bays.

Unconfirmed reports of a firefight at the Iranian Fowdow facility


Definitely be interested to hear if this firms up.
 
Unconfirmed reports of a firefight at the Iranian Fowdow facility

Ouuuu so is it Israeli SOF or is it anti-Regime partisans who saw an opportunity to help expedite the stop of Israeli bombs dropping by helping Israel achieve their objectives, or an homegrown anti-regime militia recruited and trained by the IDF that has now been activated?
 
Ouuuu so is it Israeli SOF or is it anti-Regime partisans who saw an opportunity to help expedite the stop of Israeli bombs dropping by helping Israel achieve their objectives, or an homegrown anti-regime militia recruited and trained by the IDF that has now been activated?
Nothing has firmed up, it’s probably just Twitter BS.
 
Back
Top