• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Political impacts of Ukraine war

Nobody trusts Putin but Trump. Good descriptor of Trump around the 6 minute mark.

German TV Interview:

Former US Commander Ben Hodges on the Ukraine summit at the White House | DW News

 
Bit of an odd story came out this morning.

Alt: https://archive.ph/tUnpv
Remember this guy? Seems like USSR 2.0 sure did - just spotted this from RUS state media (archived link to non-RUS server here for more) ....
Screenshot 2025-08-21 110554.jpg
More from other media
Like a fine mille-feuille pastry, lots of layers of RUS mind-fuckery right there ....
 
Some of the Administration appear they would rather have them fly CAP over the Kremlin...
You may be closer to the action there than I, but the administration voices I hear seem either indifferent to the whole thing or want to provide CAS for the Orcs. 😡
 
A bit more stuff getting out there on potential air support, including the term "no-fly zone" ...
... with a bit of backstory here

And if the U.S. needed an excuse ....
 
Further to POTUS's unusually statements.

Looks like the last guy to talk to him before his tweet must have been Pro-UKR...
Good catch there - and you're likely right. Especially since in July, he sorta nudged UKR to strike deep, but not at Moscow.
Maybe Zelenskyy can say, "hey, we'll take our sights off Moscow when they take the sights off Kyiv?" ;)
 
A lot more on Ukraine's long range strike systems, from the start with the FP-1 and now the FP-5 Flamingo, which they planning on being able to build 7 a month in October.

Fairly innovative plan to sell certain weapons to Europe to help fund the expansion, and acquisition of certain items not as easily made at home.


Tailor made to be used against a particular massive country, twice the range and payload of a Tomahawk. This winter may have a couple deep surprise, rapid spontaneous combustions.
 
Good catch there - and you're likely right. Especially since in July, he sorta nudged UKR to strike deep, but not at Moscow.
Maybe Zelenskyy can say, "hey, we'll take our sights off Moscow when they take the sights off Kyiv?" ;)
Apparently POTUS encouraged Zelensky to target Moscow and St Petersburg in the latest meeting, or to have the ability to do so.

He's also now talking about a No Fly zone over Ukraine - since Putin apparently reneged on his commitment to the Peace Process in Alaska and has announced his isn't going to be trying to mediate it anymore unless Russia comes to the table.

Here's hoping for him sticking to todays thought process, and not TACO'ing. IF he finally realizes that Putin really did play him, he will want revenge, and that will be goof for Ukraine.
 
A lot more on Ukraine's long range strike systems, from the start with the FP-1 and now the FP-5 Flamingo, which they planning on being able to build 7 a month in October.

Fairly innovative plan to sell certain weapons to Europe to help fund the expansion, and acquisition of certain items not as easily made at home.
I mis typed - it is one a day now, and plan to be at 7 a day in October...
 
I mis typed - it is one a day now, and plan to be at 7 a day in October...

I note that Milanion indicates a production rate of over 50 a month.


The company is a UAE company registered in the UK with the contact given as Davinder Singh Dogra.

Singh is a Sikh name/title. The Dogras are from the Jammu Kashmir district - currently in dispute with Pakistan, China and India.

Coupled with Brazilian Avibras it would appear as if the world is determined on doing things differently.

NATO weaponcraft maybe falling behind the curve.
 
I note that Milanion indicates a production rate of over 50 a month.


The company is a UAE company registered in the UK with the contact given as Davinder Singh Dogra.

Singh is a Sikh name/title. The Dogras are from the Jammu Kashmir district - currently in dispute with Pakistan, China and India.

Coupled with Brazilian Avibras it would appear as if the world is determined on doing things differently.

NATO weaponcraft maybe falling behind the curve.
It’s a fairly primitive design. The UKR version needed a bunch of help on the guidance system and a few other things.

NATO’s issues are generally not technology, but procurement. With low procurement, industry isn’t pushing to expand production lines, nor investing a lot of IRD for upgrades.
 
It’s a fairly primitive design. The UKR version needed a bunch of help on the guidance system and a few other things.

NATO’s issues are generally not technology, but procurement. With low procurement, industry isn’t pushing to expand production lines, nor investing a lot of IRD for upgrades.
It reminds me of a V1 class with an improved guidance system.

🍻
 
Back
Top