• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Guns or Drones or Both?

Does this suggest more tactical usage of the Shaheds? Pre-fragmented HE with airburst fuses, and thermobaric warheads?


It could just be to spread more terror deeper into the civilian areas. But could it also be meant to be used over the trenches to make up for reductions in guns and tanks?
 
This one is for @Kirkhill



Further to... new TWZ article with video from the tradeshow and the blurb.

10,000 lb payload total.
Up to 7,000 lb internal
Up to 8,000 lb on the hook
Can carry a loaded HIMARS pod internally with the doors closed.

 
Cheap ($20-50k) is defeated by even cheaper ($2500). The visual comparison is really something, even a version to counter jet powered Shahed's now.



Article from August 2025.
 
Cheap ($20-50k) is defeated by even cheaper ($2500). The visual comparison is really something, even a version to counter jet powered Shahed's now.



Article from August 2025.

The sound on that video.

The Germans had to put sirens on their Stukas to achieve that effect.
 
I think this checks both boxes.


Not familiar with this specific UGV design but I do see that each has it's own Starlink dish. I wonder what the max carry load, battery idle life, and cost are.
I can definitely see the utility of these UGV's but I'm wondering exactly how they will be managed. They move at the speed of dismounted troops but how are they moving to the front with the infantry? Trailers? In the back of light mobility vehicles/APCs? They seem to fit well on a static front type situation but how do you use them if you're able to engage in maneuver?
 
I can definitely see the utility of these UGV's but I'm wondering exactly how they will be managed. They move at the speed of dismounted troops but how are they moving to the front with the infantry? Trailers? In the back of light mobility vehicles/APCs? They seem to fit well on a static front type situation but how do you use them if you're able to engage in maneuver?

Are you manoeuvering at the pace of Goose Green? Or 73 Easting?

And as for bringing them along with the infantry

How many could fit on a beavertail hauled by a Senator.
 
Russia has developed a UGV that launches UAVs to take out enemy UAVs.


Combined with the MG-toting UGV posted above we're seeing more and more of the actual trigger pulling of weapons being de-coupled from the weapon itself.

Is the eventual end state one side's UXV's defeating the other side's UXV's in a proxy of traditional human-vs-human combat? Does the role of infantry eventually change from "taking and holding ground" to "holding and occupying ground taken by robotic weapon systems"?
 
Kirkhill quietly slips off to the bathroom with a box of Kleenex ;)

Further to....


1761945459272.jpeg


In terms of equipment and vehicles, the paper shows that drone warfare exposes vulnerabilities that designers may not have considered. For instance, if your fancy new combat vehicle has rubber tires it might as well be a hockey goalie with no helmet. What’s most important: buy equipment that’s modular, so that broken parts can be quickly swapped out.

But NATO leaders don’t feel the same urgency to change, one of the participants in the GLOBSEC dialogue said. Limited resources and invading forces galvanized Ukrainian innovation, but alliance members have larger budgets, relatively sophisticated equipment, and no Russian forces on their territory. For example, Ukraine has created a command-and-control architecture that coordinates humans and robots, even under constant electronic warfare attack.

“We don't” have that, the participant said, meaning NATO. “It has a lot to do with our policies, the way we approach sharing [intelligence] and and our dependency on fixed command control systems provided by big, big suppliers.”

“What I see is that the steering in most European headquarters is still done based on investment budgets,” the participant said. “We just go on buying big stuff. It just continues. and I think that's really the worse part.”

....

WRT the rubber tyres

1761945938375.jpeg
 
In terms of equipment and vehicles, the paper shows that drone warfare exposes vulnerabilities that designers may not have considered. For instance, if your fancy new combat vehicle has rubber tires it might as well be a hockey goalie with no helmet. What’s most important: buy equipment that’s modular, so that broken parts can be quickly swapped out.
I think Watling's caution isn't so much about rubber tires (i.e. wheeled vehicles) as opposed to rubber "tracks" which I suspect he considers a maintenance/repair weakness over linked tracks.
WRT the rubber tyres

View attachment 96549
I do agree with you however. My past reading about WW2 talked about great loss rate in tires as a result of rubble and mostly artillery splinters. We have much netter, run-flat tires these days but still - damaged is damaged. Steel tracks and the solid tires do much better.

🍻
 
Back
Top