• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
Incinerators.....please!

The flue gases can be managed. Personally I like peat bogs.






And the neat thing about using peat moss as a filter is that you can dry it witth waste heat, burn it as a fuel, harvest the heat as energy and the heavy metals they captured from the flue gas are captured in the ash.
 
Incinerators.....please!

The flue gases can be managed. Personally I like peat bogs.






And the neat thing about using peat moss as a filter is that you can dry it witth waste heat, burn it as a fuel, harvest the heat as energy and the heavy metals they captured from the flue gas are captured in the ash.

Ottawa could really use one of those. Sadly I think city council is just going to opt for another place to bury trash.
 
Ottawa could really use one of those. Sadly I think city council is just going to opt for another place to bury trash.

A lot of Canadian cities could use one of them.

Natural Gas
Waste

Yield

Electricity
Hot Water
 
Incinerators.....please!

The flue gases can be managed. Personally I like peat bogs.






And the neat thing about using peat moss as a filter is that you can dry it witth waste heat, burn it as a fuel, harvest the heat as energy and the heavy metals they captured from the flue gas are captured in the ash.
It will never happen. David Suzuki would mobilize the entire city of Toronto plus Vancouver. No politician could tolerate the heat even if it is the right thing to do
 
Incineration is political Kryptonite. Even with high-tech, high-temperature 'plasma' burners, people equate them with the backyard burn barrel.

One problem with using peat bogs as a 'filter' is they are nowhere near where the source of most of the waste is.
 
Incineration is political Kryptonite. Even with high-tech, high-temperature 'plasma' burners, people equate them with the backyard burn barrel.

One problem with using peat bogs as a 'filter' is they are nowhere near where the source of most of the waste is.

I agree with you on the kryptonite.

But we now have a generation of folks calling for a nuclear reactor in every backyard. That hasn't been seen since the 1950s.

And we do have lots of incinerating peers to emulate. Education/propaganda works. It is what both killed and resurrected the nukes and killed the urban power plant.

As to the peatbogs, I sold peatbogs.
They were alternatives, and adjuncts, to chemical scrubbers. They were containerized and layered and the peat was replaced at regular intervals. The peat was brought to the plant and treated like any other reagent or input.
 
I agree with you on the kryptonite.

But we now have a generation of folks calling for a nuclear reactor in every backyard. That hasn't been seen since the 1950s.

And we do have lots of incinerating peers to emulate. Education/propaganda works. It is what both killed and resurrected the nukes and killed the urban power plant.

As to the peatbogs, I sold peatbogs.
They were alternatives, and adjuncts, to chemical scrubbers. They were containerized and layered and the peat was replaced at regular intervals. The peat was brought to the plant and treated like any other reagent or input.
There's still a sizable bloc, at least in the GTA, that is against the nukes they have and the ones proposed. 'Wind and solar are the future'.

Perhaps the reason there has been a general quietness about nuclear, at least in the West, is the stagnant nature of the industry. When is the last time one was commissioned?

Man, I think it would take a lot of lipstick to pretty up an incinerator to the general public.

I wasn't aware that there was commercial peat industry beyond gardening. Even within that industry, there is much debate about its continued use because of the ecological impact.
 
There's still a sizable bloc, at least in the GTA, that is against the nukes they have and the ones proposed. 'Wind and solar are the future'.

Perhaps the reason there has been a general quietness about nuclear, at least in the West, is the stagnant nature of the industry. When is the last time one was commissioned?

Man, I think it would take a lot of lipstick to pretty up an incinerator to the general public.

I wasn't aware that there was commercial peat industry beyond gardening. Even within that industry, there is much debate about its continued use because of the ecological impact.

All true. But every course of action attracts detractors. And things do change over time.

My boomers had a strong anti-nuke contingent. I was one of the pro-nuke crowd. Since then, I am told I have survived three more generations: X, Y(Millenials), and Z and am working on four, Alpha.

And I know for a fact they don't think like real people. 😁
 
There they go...




 
And yet Tolko is hiring in Spallumcheen, I see trainloads of milled lumber leaving the mill everyday. Woodtone (red cedar deck and post (very big $$)) is still walking the streets with a hook to grab anybody with a pulse? I don’t understand that industry.
 
And yet Tolko is hiring in Spallumcheen, I see trainloads of milled lumber leaving the mill everyday. Woodtone (red cedar deck and post (very big $$)) is still walking the streets with a hook to grab anybody with a pulse? I don’t understand that industry.

Looks like they're focusing on the specialty markets...

Province giving Tolko $8-million to expand Heffley Creek mill in Kamloops​



 
If BC forestry is in trouble, tariffs were probably only the tipping point. Homegrown political decisions, particularly by the provincial government, reduced the ability of companies to respond to fiscal stress. Remove enough of anyone's fiscal freedom of manoeuvre and eventually they won't be able to survive a new stressor. I suspect the NDP over-milked the cow, trying to feed all their anti-forestry constituencies, and didn't think about how easy they were making it to destabilize the entire industry.
 
Whelp... there goes Canada's only refinery on this coast...


Burnaby, B.C., oil refinery to fall under U.S. control in $9.1B deal​


British Columbia’s largest oil refinery is set to fall under U.S. control this week with the expected takeover of Canadian fuel refiner and retailer Parkland Corporation by American fuel giant Sunoco.

The Parkland refinery in Burnaby, one of only two remaining refineries in B.C., will be sold as part of a US$9.1-billion deal that is expected to close on Oct. 31, according to the Calgary-based company’s latest quarterly earnings report.

 
If BC forestry is in trouble, tariffs were probably only the tipping point. Homegrown political decisions, particularly by the provincial government, reduced the ability of companies to respond to fiscal stress. Remove enough of anyone's fiscal freedom of manoeuvre and eventually they won't be able to survive a new stressor. I suspect the NDP over-milked the cow, trying to feed all their anti-forestry constituencies, and didn't think about how easy they were making it to destabilize the entire industry.
Perhaps the NDP are picking the companies they want to survive. Tolko is very much under FN control. I mean why else pump 8 million tax dollars into an industry that is shuttering everywhere else in BC. I’ve heard that by next year there won’t be a single operating mill east of the Arrow Lakes in BC, and that the forest service roads are being closed off to the public by the province.
 
Whelp... there goes Canada's only refinery on this coast...


Burnaby, B.C., oil refinery to fall under U.S. control in $9.1B deal​


British Columbia’s largest oil refinery is set to fall under U.S. control this week with the expected takeover of Canadian fuel refiner and retailer Parkland Corporation by American fuel giant Sunoco.

The Parkland refinery in Burnaby, one of only two remaining refineries in B.C., will be sold as part of a US$9.1-billion deal that is expected to close on Oct. 31, according to the Calgary-based company’s latest quarterly earnings report.


Carney is facing his government falling on this budget.

If he gives us our pipeline then he will lose Quebec to the Bloc and BC to the NDP. And he won't pick up much in terms of prairie votes. And oil is entirely secondary to his world view.

He has already signalled that he is happy to keep the oil flowing to the US. A new Keystone is less problematic than a new Northern Gateway. Selling Burnaby to the Yanks is probably easy for him to justify. After all the oil industry is dying... might as well leave Trump with the stranded assets.

What most easterners don't realize is that as far as Albertans are concerned it is American money that created their prosperity since Leduc.

He isn't doing much to make Canada an attractive proposition.



Canada east is known for foreclosing on depression era farms and the National Energy Policy.


TMX which feeds Burnaby also feeds Anacortes. Burnaby has been driving the cost of Alberta oil up in the US. By buying Burnaby the Yanks can plug that leak. Shut down Burnaby and direct that flow to Anacortes. No competition for Alberta oil.

It would support a major expansion at Anacortes....
 
That refinery supplies about 80% of the fuels for SW BC, prior to TMX, 40% of the feedstock went to the US. Parkland also includes all the Chevron Stations in BC.
 
Back
Top