The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

[Fishbone Jones]

Here comes the other shoe. Compliment to CCFR.

Somehow, I don’t think this will be the "Final Report."

Public Safety Publishes Final Report by Secret Advisory Panel​ Yesterday, Public Safety Canada released a statement and report written by an anonymous "panel of experts" that worked in secret to advise the government on further gun bans of currently available models. This is an assault on democracy in Canada.

In the report, the authors (who have not been disclosed publicly in any way), provide recommendations for which currently legal firearms should be banned next – not by the legislative process – but by more regulatory mechanisms like Orders in Council (OICs). This Liberal government is continuing the ten-year trend of leaving the true stakeholders out of all discussions, and leaving the democratic process out of their dictates when it comes to firearms. The CCFR was not consulted in any way throughout this secretive report creation process. The level of abuse that Canadian firearm owners have endured both under Trudeau's Liberals, and now with clear continuity of form and function under the Carney Liberal government is unprecedented. This opaque mandate by Public Safety Canada is the latest in their sneaky, underhanded tactics to destroy civilian firearms ownership in Canada. It is clear that the voices and opinions of lawful firearm owners are not valued or welcomed in the decision making process for the very laws and regulations that affect them directly. The Liberals continue their policy of excluding stakeholder groups and only including those who agree with their agenda. The fact that they hide the composition of their so called "expert panel" and do nothing with proper legislation, demonstrates their utter disregard for the democratic process and total lack of respect for licenced firearms owners. It's not hard to guess who was likely included in this panel. We recommend that you take the time to review the report and to make note of the so-called "gap list" of firearms that are likely to be made prohibited next. Continuing with their latest preoccupation with banning the SKS, they list other firearms that the "experts" believe you should not be able to own or use in Canada. The broad categories listed in the report include: Semi-automatic shotguns with detachable magazines (includes bullpups) Semi-automatic military service firearms (Garand, SKS, etc.) Unique or unusual firearms (primarily 9mm SMGs) The media is also largely continuing to ignore the open admission by Public Safety that the confiscation ("buyback") program is grossly underfunded when it comes to compensation for individuals. Some, like the CBC, are even continuing to report that the program is voluntary, despite that being demonstrably false. You can watch our social media channels for any further developments related to this report.

The Report

Final report from the Expert Advisory Panel on Firearms

A report considering the classification of several models of firearms not prohibited by regulation (orders-in-council (OICs)) in May 2020 and December 2024, but which share characteristics with the firearms prohibited by regulation.

www.publicsafety.gc.ca

 

[Halifax Tar]

The only person gun owners will hate more than a Liberal is the Conservative who forms a Gov and doesn't correct garbage post haste.

 

[Haggis]

Two people are out hunting together with identical SKSs. One is a first nations member, the other a rural Canadian farmer. In the eyes of Polysesuovient, one hunter is carrying a hunting rifle, the other an assault rifle.

Now, those same two people are hunting but they only have one rifle between them. Does it change classifications depending on who is holding it?

 

[Halifax Tar]

Two people are out hunting together with identical SKSs. One is a first nations member, the other a rural Canadian farmer. In the eyes of Polysesuovient, one hunter is carrying a hunting rifle, the other an assault rifle.

Now, those same two people are hunting but they only have one rifle between them. Does it change classifications depending on who is holding it?

You cannot debate with the Polysesuovient folks.

They have one aim and goal and it's to remove your legally obtained and operated property. And their justification is 'because'.