- Reaction score
- 37,927
- Points
- 1,210
No.How about just kicking him the fuck out. No clearance, and a 5f release.
This is 2B territory, not 5F.

No.How about just kicking him the fuck out. No clearance, and a 5f release.
2B or not 2B? That is the question when DMP and DCS make a joint submission on sentencing.No.
This is 2B territory, not 5F.
If a Court Martial sentences someone to dismissal (with or without disgrace) you're under 1, not 2. As there's no court martial for the MCpl, you're under article 2 of the Release chapter of the QR&Os. Though I likely got it wrong - based on a five year custodial sentence that's more like a 2A than a 2B, I think.2B or not 2B? That is the question when DMP and DCS make a joint submission on sentencing.
Sucks to suck.Gah, confusing my miscreants.
The MCpl would be 2A. The MP Capt would likely be 2B.
Followed by the Chicago Police giving it their best rendition of nothing to see here and Cook County State’s Attorney declining to prosecute.Shoot your partner/ former gf in the back instead of the bad guy, run away and hide while she calls in the incident.
She later dies...
cheknews.ca
Given a 1990 conviction and the fact that homicide investigations are typically lead by detectives with some seniority, I suspect the only sanction would be criminal (or civil by Rees himself). Intent might be tough to prove.Nineteen years in jail for second degree murder. Police never disclosed an interview with another suspect that at the very least could have given rise to reasonable doubt.
Charges now withdrawn.
I wonder if the officers who withheld the evidence will face sanctions?
![]()
Murder charge withdrawn after conviction of Timothy Rees set aside in 1989 killing
Prosecutors have withdrawn a second-degree murder charge against Timothy Rees, weeks after Ontario’s top court set aside his conviction in the 1989 killing of a 10-year-old girl.www.ctvnews.ca
Given a 1990 conviction and the fact that homicide investigations are typically lead by detectives with some seniority, I suspect the only sanction would be criminal (or civil by Rees himself). Intent might be tough to prove.
Funny how these things happen... The missing tape was found in a box on the office of Toronto's police chief. The man on the tape who said that he'd "had fun" with the murder victim at night? Coincidentally, the son of an OPP officer.
What an absolute muppet. Is he likely to face professional consequences?Not high ranking and a bit of a crossover to the "Walts, Posers and Wanna-be" thread. A Border Services Officer convicted of stolen valour.
I would guess that he is now that the criminal proceedings have been concluded.What an absolute muppet. Is he likely to face professional consequences?
www.instagram.com
The fact that the box was in the Chief's office is indeed weird. I'm not going to make excuses for the conduct of the investigation but document and evidence handling has always been a challenge in larger investigations, particularly ones involving multiple investigators. So has tunnel vision and 'target fixation'. That something could 'end up in a box' doesn't surprise me. In the late 1990s Ontario developed the Major Case Management System along with a case management software system to log and track every single piece of information and evidence in an investigation. A lot of the precedence for what is done now came from lessons learned in the UK.Funny how these things happen... The missing tape was found in a box on the office of Toronto's police chief. The man on the tape who said that he'd "had fun" with the murder victim at night? Coincidentally, the son of an OPP officer.