• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

Seen. Agreed.



Fair.



Agreed




Batting a thousand here.



I agree with the comments about the 30 shops. That is why I agree with using them for the drones.

In genetic terms we are looking at a mutation event. Ukraine and the terrorists are the mutagen. We need a bunch of different mutants so we can let natural selection take its course.

Wrt the Roshel situation I was thinking of down-selecting a couple from the 30.
I really do wonder if Roshel could provide a sort of 21st century CMP for us. We have a long history of converting OTS chassis and motors into highly dependable and successful military vehicles. Lots of roles can be filled with those sorts of vehicles as long as scope creep is kept to a minimum and we arent using them as shitty IFVs.
 
We do a version of this. And boy is it fun to see how mad people get.


You do not need to use the force to be a deterrent -- but you have to have the availability of that force.

For example: XVIII Airborne Corps -- lets face it the likelihood of 82nd ABN doing a Div jump into combat supported by 11th ABN, and the 101st Air Assault/Airmobility is really low these days. However it gives a rapid ability for us to project ground forces into an AO with Joint Forcible Entry.

The CA sending a BG doesn't really project much other than weakness and lack of resolve.

At 3.5% the CA definitely can have the ability to have a Corps and deploy a Div on a rotational basis, and should be able to field a Field Army of 3 Corps on Mobilization.
... or a platoon.
 
That was announced a long time ago, under the last PM I think.

A government announcing the same thing over and over?

The Simpsons GIF
 
We are not a serious country. Elbow up, chins out, stomach in, back straight. Forward march.
Prepare to mount.
Mount your Gripens.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0022.jpeg
    IMG_0022.jpeg
    394.9 KB · Views: 57
What does dooming about some rando on twitter constitute Canada being unserious? Am I missing something here about some random guy's opinion?
Well Alex McColl is a huge Gripen guy on twitter... well huge in the context of Canadian defence commentary. HT sounds like they work at DLR 5-4 outside of the gripen comments.
 
“Alex McColl is a Columnist for the Western Standard based in Calgary, Alberta. He has a Master’s in Public Policy in Public Administration from the University of Calgary”

From time to time he’s on one or more the networks, usually Global. He interviews and writes about defence policy. Many of these people with a media audience don’t seem to understand the purpose of national defence and are certainly a reflection of the general population. They obviously feel it’s about show boating, buying Gripens to spite Americans - at air shows - and somehow rehabilitating Prince Harry to becoming the next Governor General. ( yes he wrote that).
 



Canada becoming an honorary Nordic country and also joining JEF?


...

BvS10s
CV90s
Leos
K9s
CAVs

Kongsberg turrets, missiles and FDCs
Nammo munitions
Saab all sorts
 
Related

UK moving Generals around

New Deputy Chief of the General Staff
New Commander Allied Rapid Response Corps
New Commander Land Forces.

CLF used to be Commander Field Force but now he has lost his forces.
He will handle force generation.

Both 1 and 3 Divisions have now been asigned to ARRC.

ARRC now seems to incorporate

1 Sigs Bde
104 Theatre Support Bde
8 Eng Bde
7 AD Gp
1 Aviation Brigade Combat Team
1 UK Div
3 UK Div
The Danish Div
An Italian Div
4th US Inf Div

and 1 Cdn Div

ARRC membership seems to incorporate the entirety of JEF directly or indirectly.
 



Canada becoming an honorary Nordic country and also joining JEF?


...

BvS10s
CV90s
Leos
K9s
CAVs

Kongsberg turrets, missiles and FDCs
Nammo munitions
Saab all sorts

Working with our Nordic neighbours makes sense. Our geography and climactic dispositions are similar.
 
I didn't realize this.

In December, when the US relinquished command of Joint Forces Commands Brunssum, Naples and Norfolk to the Dutch, Italians and Brits respectively, the Swedes, Danes and Finns joined the Norwegians under the new Brit led command.

That casts new light, for me, on two other areas of interest.

The Joint Expeditionary Force incorporating the UK with Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, together with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, as well as the Netherlands, has been a dual function organization. Within NATO it has been an RN led endeavour focusing on the High Arctic and the North Atlantic. But it has also established its independence of NATO and its willingness to make its own decisions on where, when and how to act.

It appears as if that JEF grouping is now formalized at Norfolk where the US can keep an eye on things.

It also sheds some light on the flurry of activity regarding these projects


Atlantic Net
Atlantic Bastion
Norwegian Type 26s
Swedish Type 31s
Danish Type 31s
British Multi Role ships from Norway
Norwegian Type 212s

And the RN advancing the private contract for Atlantic surveillance
Procurement of

Rattler USVs, 7.2 m
ARCIMS USVs, 11 m
Cetus/Excalibur XLUUV, 12 m and 19 tonne
Proteus VTUAVs

And looking towards

the Type 92 LUSV in the 45 m and 500 to 1000 tonne range.

...

What is the overlap with our national coastal needs and our commitments to our responsibilities in the NW Atlantic? Both civil and military?

....

Second area of interest

The Brit led Allied Rapid Reaction Corps, which includes the Danish Division currently leading the Multi-National Division - North under which our Latvian Brigade falls, also includes our 1st Division.

The Brits appear to be in the process of spinning up ARRC as an active Corps rather than just an HQ. This seems to parallel our own efforts to create a warfighting division out of our bits and pieces.

If all of our bits and pieces are going to be committed to a single warfighting division and if we are committed to supplying a division to ARRC does that suggest that all of our warfighting assets are committed to ARRC, and by association, JEF?

Or is our 2nd Div, the Domestic Div, ultimately going to retain some of those warfighting assets once the shake-out is complete?

WRT what is necessary for warfighting these days, that seems to be in the forefront of everybody's mind.
 
Back
Top