• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

None of the major news outlets have picked this up, so it may in the end be nothing more than "conjecture", but boys oh boys if it's true.

Would it be Vance going behind Trump's back?
Or
Trump using Vance to purposfuuly leak the story expressly so that they could ban Politico?

 
None of the major news outlets have picked this up, so it may in the end be nothing more than "conjecture", but boys oh boys if it's true.

Would it be Vance going behind Trump's back?
Or
Trump using Vance to purposfuuly leak the story expressly so that they could ban Politico?

Status News is generally regarded as a factual left-center outlet that hasn’t failed any fact-checks. It also has covered negative aspects of politicians in the left as well, so there may be some fire here. I guess we’ll know more if it unfolds or disappears

 
None of the major news outlets have picked this up, so it may in the end be nothing more than "conjecture", but boys oh boys if it's true.

Would it be Vance going behind Trump's back?
Or
Trump using Vance to purposfuuly leak the story expressly so that they could ban Politico?

1790281764018.png
 
I'm confused. If by "leaker" you mean the 'unnamed senior official" that "leaked" information about an impending Iran deal, it has been established that the unnamed official was Vance, and all reporters in the room were told to refer to him as an unnamed senior administration official. Trump used that instance in the legal submissions as proof that the outlet in question was a national security risk.

What am I missing?
 
Back
Top