• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Recent content by calculus

  1. C

    New Canadian Shipbuilding Strategy

    Right, but based on the Brits, it looks like the time to build their T26 is around 7 years, versus 3.5 average for the FDI. It was just a question, not a criticism...
  2. C

    New Canadian Shipbuilding Strategy

    The build rate?
  3. C

    New Canadian Shipbuilding Strategy

    Why couldn't Irving adopt some of the techniques, tools, and procedures used by Naval Group to build their FDI frigates so quickly? https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2026/04/video-how-naval-group-builds-fdi-frigates-so-quickly/
  4. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    Seen here in this nice description and graphic: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/rms/documents/naval-launchers-and-munitions/MK41-VLS-product-card.pdf
  5. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    Also, Noah is claiming the RCN is looking at adding 8 more MK41 cells. Bottom of the following link: This Week in Defence (03/30/26): River-Class, VLS-Cells, CDC Limits, New Contracts, 2% Talk, New CHER Bundles
  6. C

    Future Helicopters

    MV-75 is very close to being fielded. One would hope this is an option under consideration for nTACS. https://www.military.com/feature/2026/03/27/mv-75-armys-new-aircraft-and-future-of-air-assault-warfare.html
  7. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    I don't disagree, but I thought one of the design principles for the first batch of 3 was to use mature and in-service systems to reduce risk as much as possible?
  8. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    The Hunter class are reputedly slightly wider, which I My concern is LEED is largely still in development. It's remarkably hard to find any information on where this program stands.
  9. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    One of the best looks at the changes introduced in the recently released updated River class model. Interestingly the mention of space for another 8-cell MK41 is discussed again...
  10. C

    Replacing the Subs

    No, it (the Dosan Ahn Chang-ho, a batch 1 sub) was commissioned in August 2021. You might be thinking of the first batch 2 version.
  11. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    Related topic, Cellula has scored a contract to develop a prototype AUV for the USN: https://www.navaltoday.com/2026/03/25/cellula-robotics-wins-contract-to-deliver-auv-prototype-for-us/
  12. C

    Canadian modular assault rifle project, a C7 replacement?

    The round is called "Shell Shock", and uses basically a steel case (tungsten carbide): This guy was getting those velocities out of an 18 inch barrel. He started to experience barrel burnout around 3500-4000 rds, and some parts breakage, but that was on a pretty standard pattern AR15...
  13. C

    Canadian modular assault rifle project, a C7 replacement?

    What ammo spec are we talking here? I've seen video of 75 grain bullets travelling at 3500fps, with a pressure of 100000 psi! I would agree with @KevinB that is a substantial increase over standard NATO 556, which is generically described at 62 gr/~62000 psi. That will be punishing to barrels no...
  14. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    Looks like we can thank Japan for massively de-risking SPY-7, especially with regards to integration with the AEGIS CMS: https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/navy-news/2026/japan-completes-first-spy-7-radar-detection-trials-to-track-multiple-missile-threats-on-asev-destroyers
  15. C

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    I noticed the same thing, but I think it's a perspective issue, as the model shown yesterday does not show that feature.
Back
Top