• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CBH99's latest activity

  • C
    CBH99 reacted to brihard's post in the thread Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ??? with Like Like.
    It probably was not. Though, were they demanding what we could supply at a price we could supply it at inclusive of costs to build...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to YZT580's post in the thread Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ??? with Like Like.
    from what I recall, both were offering to finance/pay for the infrastructure required.
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to RangerRay's post in the thread M240 replacement with Like Like.
    LSVW - Light Squeaky Vehicle, Wheeled There’s a whole sordid history about the acquisition of this vehicle that I’m sure most members...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to OldSolduer's post in the thread M240 replacement with Like Like.
    The LSVW (Self Igniting) was and is crap
  • C
    Well it looks like they're going to be replacing Russia regardless, so that first point is kinda moot... And we'd only be undercutting...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to Underway's post in the thread Canada's tanks with Insightful Insightful.
    Nunavut is actually the "high arctic desert" with tundra and sea ice. Northern Norway still has trees. Lots of tall coniferous trees...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to Underway's post in the thread Canada's tanks with Like Like.
    Sure, and a BV series will work amazing in a lot of places that are not the high arctic. That's more a testament to a well designed...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to GK .Dundas's post in the thread Canada's tanks with Like Like.
    One of the reasons I have tended to prefer American equipment aside from advanced technologies and scales of manufacturing. As well as...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to Kirkhill's post in the thread Canada's tanks with Insightful Insightful.
    Our fluffy, puffy 60s era cold weather gear was not a match for either Gagetown or Norway. It soaked up moisture. It worked fine out...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to Dana381's post in the thread Canada's tanks with Insightful Insightful.
    I remember seeing a documentary once about building in the arctic, they needed special steel for the buildings to take the cold. The...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to KevinB's post in the thread Infantry of Tomorrow with Like Like.
    I was more thinking for the Bradley formations etc - the Abrams was a little overkill for Iraq. Dismounts had Javelins and AH-64’s ;)...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to FJAG's post in the thread Infantry of Tomorrow with Insightful Insightful.
    I used to be dead set against the converted truck, Senator type vehicles. I thought the Grizzley, Bisson and Stryker as adequate but...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to HavokFour's post in the thread Infantry of Tomorrow with Love it! Love it!.
    Just throwing this in here. The Senator even has a bunch of variants already designed and ready to go, even an electronic CUAS version...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to PrairieFella's post in the thread Infantry of Tomorrow with Love it! Love it!.
    Apparently they're also looking at how to integrate mortars into the things. Just for Senators, there are MRAPs, APCs, EOD variants...
  • C
    CBH99 reacted to Kirkhill's post in the thread Infantry of Tomorrow with Like Like.
    Infantry plus UAVs to create a 10 to 15 km deep kill zone...
Back
Top