I think that fair is fair:
We get tariffed for our more frequent wild fires sending smoke their way, then they get tarriffed for all the damages caused by wind, flooding, hail and other consequences from the more and more frequent hurricanes they are doing nothing to stop from coming North at us.
It shouldn't. Even without the US, the rest of NATO (the Europeans) has 600 million people to fight Russia's 140. There is no need for our 40 million people for land fighting.
Our primary task, and our national interests, is clearly to secure the Northern half of the North American fortress...
A platform parked in a single position does not contribute much to the Recognized Maritime picture. Nor does a platform incapable of interaction with the people on the vessels being intercepted/recorded to the picture.
There are a few things that even a moron (Trump) can't do, even for a Moroun. You can't sell that which is not yours. Ownership of the bridge is clearly and unambiguously that of the State of Michigan and Canada. For Trump to take it can only be done by way of expropriation, which, in the US...
Name them after sharks but keep the word "shark" out: HMCS's Tiger, Hammerhead, Blacknose, Leopard, Grey Reef, Sharptooth, Silvertip, Smoothhound, Longfin, Thresher, Nurse and Kitefin.
After the bridge opens, who says we have to abide by the new deal? If the US isn't bound by its word, why should we?
Go back to keeping all the toll money until the bridge is paid for, then split it with Michigan only. After all, the money is collected on the Canadian side by the Canadian...
Anyone remembers the Yes Prime Minister episode where the French try to give the Queen a puppy as gift and are adamant that it should not go into quarantine first?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.