That’s such an unfortunate oversight in the execution of the vessel. As far as I know, and I certainly stand to be corrected, the propulsion, hotel systems and accommodations as well as the ability to transfer and store provisions (without a native help, notwithstanding) are all successfully...
Not being a naval engineer, I’m wondering how difficult it is to install baffles in the tanks now or at a refit in the near future? Is it a huge endeavour that makes it not worth it or is it a feasiblility?
I guess in that hypothetical TG I was referring to, you’d have the option to go with whatever seemed appropriate in any given scenario. No doubt it’ll be a leap forward to have that kind of layering in place.
I’m still wondering if the 57 on a Halifax with its higher rate of fire is more or less effective than a 127 against these types of attacks. I mentioned before that once a RCD leads a TG, it’ll be party composed of a CPF or two. How will these two systems complement each other in these scenarios?
It gets me thinking about about how two platforms working together might deal with these kind of airborne threats. The first task force that an RCD might lead would likely have 2 HALIFAX class as well. How effective is the high fire rate 57 and the phalanx at dealing with drones? Could be that...
I believe you’re referring to ST LAURENT, probably. I’m also wondering what’s going on with TERRY FOX, it seems like she’s been at Ontario Shipyards for over a year now.
It’s understandable why they went the way they did and of course the entire conversation is moot, because that ship has sailed…or hasn’t in certain circumstances. Those points are all absolutely valid, but unfortunately we’re still in the fix we’re in now with the various fleets. If we really...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.