Recent content by Swampbuggy

I’m guessing discussions like these are what will determine capability and numbers in the FASST-V ORCA replacement program. Sea days, training, patrolling may possibly fall into this class (if and when it comes) and cover off at least some of the concerns debated above, particularly depending on...

I had no idea that the formal name for OC TRANSPO is Panglossian…the more you know…

There’s also whatever replaces ORCA, though it could possibly be an Ontario Shipyards or similar sized company project

That’s what I understood it to be. Those are the MEMTV’s?

With regards to JSS being used as sub support vessels… I think I read somewhere on these threads that a true support vessel for submarines would require dynamic positioning. I stand to be corrected, but I don’t believe the BERLIN/BONN/JSS class are equipped with that. Nor are the AOPS for that...

Every time I try to explain why we have and need a strong navy, I ask them to take off a shoe, place it next to their cell phone and lunchbox. I ask them what all 3 have in common and then explain how they all arrived in a sea container. It drives it home in a more relatable sense.

Yeah, if they made a demo team fly them they could have been the “Blue Dresses”….

More cupholders too

👌

Sorry @Lumber …I couldn’t resist, brother. I promise if they do that to you, I’ll pick you up a Hammer burger and fries from Hutch’s.

Sorrry @HavokFour , missed your post when I was putting mine up.

Goblin or basking???

Watch them go HMCS ARKELL or GRIMSBY just to spite you 😉

I would throw HMCS MANITOULIN into that mix as well

Would it not mean if the hull number gets reduced, then so too do the ITB’s, offset etc commensurately?