• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
And probably also Logistik Unicorp.

If there was only a way to provide the same type of service for field kit as well...
They are working on it: Operational Clothing & Footwear (OCFC2) (W8486-206245/A) - Buyandsell.gc.ca

1.2.1 Summary Background
The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is responsible for protecting Canada and defending its sovereignty, defending North America and contributing to international peace and security. To carry out their responsibilities, CAF members must be equipped with operational clothing and footwear (OCF) that provides the necessary protection and operational mobility to conduct daily operations anywhere in the world.

OCFC2 builds on the existing Consolidated Clothing Contract (C3) model operating in DND today for dress and occupational / environment uniform commodities, offering assurance of a tried and proven business model which has evolved through the last 20 years.

For all items stipulated under contract, a prime vendor would be responsible for their acquisition, as well as inventory and distribution management and other services. This managed clothing solution (MCS) provides for the opportunity to develop a direct delivery system between the contractor and the individual military member. In addition, OCFC2 will allow for lower contract management and administrative overhead, lower inventory, improved acquisition cycles, improved response times for corrective actions and product improvement while allowing the apparel, textile and footwear industries to remain competitive, innovative and responsive.

1.2.2 Brief Description

The MCS will provide end-to-end management of the DND supply chain for Operational Clothing and Footwear (OCF), from acquisition and/or manufacturing to inventory management to distribution. It will include professional and design services as well as configuration management.

The successful bidder will supply DND with a complete supply chain management approach that encompasses program management services, professional services, manufacturing, warehousing and inventory management, order processing and management, and distribution and delivery.

The MCS will also provide an online Order Management System (OMS) for use by Authorized Users who will order items for Direct Delivery to the address of their choice.

National and international deliveries may be required by the successful Bidder; destinations will only be specified at time of order.
 
Hopefully the Russo-Ukrainian War is a wake up call that we can't take our sweet a** time any more, time to kick things into high gear. Select a fighter jet, if possible cut steel on the CSC, more LAVs, etc....

This article, from 2019, is illuminating and probably reflects the fact that all political parties are more focused on what will get them votes, which means that defence is on the back burner. Even now, with Russia killing Ukrainians on a daily basis, the politicians are using various weasel words to avoid sound too 'martial'.

The problem isn't the politicians IMHO, it's that Canadians don't care about defence.

For example, Roosevelt struggled to get the US involved in WW2 and it wasn't until Pearl Harbour, when the public were galvanized to enter the war against Japan 2 years after the Germans invaded Poland, that he was able to act on public sentiments. And they still had to wait until Germany declared war on the US to enter the fight against Germany.

We might see similar dynamics play out here:

Amid global unrest, Canada's political parties say little about security, defence​


In order to know what most of the major parties think about the uncertain state of the world, and Canada's place in it, you have to dig — really dig — to find it.

The ideas, solutions and proposals around security and defence from the Liberals, New Democrats and the Green Party are buried, in some cases, at the very back of their platform documents. The Conservatives released their detailed platform plank on Tuesday.

The relative positioning of the policy pitches — along with the dearth of debate about the turbulence beyond the country's borders — has alarmed defence policy experts who say now is not the time for politics as usual.

"This is the time we need the clearest, most strategic thinking since the end of the Second World War, in terms of how we do Canadian security," said Rob Huebert, a defence expert at the University of Calgary. "It is not an exaggeration to say we are on the cusp of the most dangerous geopolitical environment we've seen in our lifetime."

 

Jesus Praise GIF by MOODMAN
 
So many issues putting operational kit in a system like Logistics Unicorps. Who by the way is out if stock of just about everything it seems.

Imagine if that was ruck sacks, helmets and tacvests.

Kids around the world are ordering similar items from Amazon etc on a daily basis these days, I don't know why we can't make that happen for 'non-weapon' type products.
 
Kids around the world are ordering similar items from Amazon etc on a daily basis these days, I don't know why we can't make that happen for 'non-weapon' type products.

Mark my words if those goes through its going to be a disaster if it's anything more than combats and NCDs.
 
Kids around the world are ordering similar items from Amazon etc on a daily basis these days, I don't know why we can't make that happen for 'non-weapon' type products.
I remember a loadmaster ~10 years ago who refused to buy his own knee pads, and couldn’t be issued them because they weren’t on his SOI. So he would stop by supply a couple times a week and trade in the pants that he wore the knees out on during his last flight. I can’t imagine an online system that could keep up with this.
 

1647191056392.png

Priorities, man! Priorities!

(I still suck at this quoting others bit - meant as response to D&B on Canadian Interest).
 
I remember a loadmaster ~10 years ago who refused to buy his own knee pads, and couldn’t be issued them because they weren’t on his SOI.
The person(s) who wrote the SOI for LMs clearly don't know what LMs do. How do you update them, aside from the UCR route?
 
A snapshot comparison with selected NATO partners.

The numbers are as provided in this NATO document https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2021/6/pdf/210611-pr-2021-094-en.pdf and I've focused on the members whose defense spending for 2021 (estimated) exceeds $10 billion.

The columns are: defense expenditures in millions (all amounts USD); real GDP in billions and the percentage of def expenditure; the per capita GDP and per capita def expenditure; number of military pers; the last four columns are the percentage of def expenditure for "equipment", "personnel", "infrastructure", and "other" as defined in the linked document - "other" is primarily defined as "O&M".

CountryDef Exped
(millions)
GDP (billions)
/ % def exp
Per capita
GDP / def exp
Pers #Eqpt %Pers %Infstr %Other %
Canada26,5231,697 / 1.3944,100 / 63271.117.6647.53.3231.52
France58,7292,534 / 2.0137,400 / 751208.027.842.533.0226.65
Germany64,7853,521 / 1.5342,200 / 644189.118.5541.753.6936.06
Italy29,7631,821 / 1.4130,500 / 428174.228.960.541.678.89
Netherlands14,378828 / 1.4547,100 / 68540.826.247.263.2623.28
Poland13,369575 / 2.1015,000 / 314121.226.147.924.9721.01
Spain14,8751,250 / 1.0226,200 / 267123.922.7560.120.7316.41
Turkey13,0571,073 / 1.5712,700 / 199445.429.0552.471.9516.53
United Kingdom72,7653,014 / 2.2944,700 / 1,023156.224.2632.691.4241.64
United States811,14020,601 / 3.5262,100 / 2,1861351.529.3537.471.5831.59

One item that caught my attention is the percentage allocated to "personnel" and the difference between the UK and USA numbers compared to the others.
 
I remember a loadmaster ~10 years ago who refused to buy his own knee pads, and couldn’t be issued them because they weren’t on his SOI. So he would stop by supply a couple times a week and trade in the pants that he wore the knees out on during his last flight. I can’t imagine an online system that could keep up with this.

Would an organization that can deliver 4.2 billion packages annually, world wide, be able to keep up?

Amazon now ships more parcels than FedEx​


For years, three companies — FedEx, UPS and the U.S. Postal Service — have controlled nearly the entire last-mile delivery market in the U.S. But a new report suggests that Amazon, through its shipping arm Amazon Logistics, is no longer a marginal threat to these companies — it has, in fact, begun shipping more parcels than FedEx, and is nearly at the shipping levels of UPS.

According to data from Pitney Bowes, a technology company focused on shipping and postage, Amazon is now one of the top deliverers of parcel shipments — meaning boxes and packages delivered to people’s homes. In 2020, Amazon Logistics delivered 4.2 billion parcel shipments, up from 1.9 billion in 2019. It now makes up, by volume, 21% of the parcel shipments in the U.S., behind the USPS (38%) and UPS (24%) but ahead of FedEx for the first time (16%).

 
Would an organization that can deliver 4.2 billion packages annually, world wide, be able to keep up?

Amazon now ships more parcels than FedEx​


For years, three companies — FedEx, UPS and the U.S. Postal Service — have controlled nearly the entire last-mile delivery market in the U.S. But a new report suggests that Amazon, through its shipping arm Amazon Logistics, is no longer a marginal threat to these companies — it has, in fact, begun shipping more parcels than FedEx, and is nearly at the shipping levels of UPS.

According to data from Pitney Bowes, a technology company focused on shipping and postage, Amazon is now one of the top deliverers of parcel shipments — meaning boxes and packages delivered to people’s homes. In 2020, Amazon Logistics delivered 4.2 billion parcel shipments, up from 1.9 billion in 2019. It now makes up, by volume, 21% of the parcel shipments in the U.S., behind the USPS (38%) and UPS (24%) but ahead of FedEx for the first time (16%).


Not what we need. We need vast quantities of stores in the right places gathering dust and waiting to be used.

This, like LUC is great for the niceties like DEUs I'd even say CADPAT and NCDs but for operational kit this is a mistake.
 
CAF finance officers are trained as budget managers, not accountants. Most would be hard pressed to discuss why there is a chart of accounts and what it represents; are poor at differentiating between the four votes used by DND/CAF; and receive little to no formal training on the mechanics of government which is a sine qua non at the more senior levels (LCol+). A finance officer who can't discuss Main Estimates, Supplementary Estimates, and the Annual Reference Level Update isn't a finance officer.

Way to open up my old wounds. I was writing a big long post in response to this, and then remembered that part of releasing was that I would leave the utter catastrophe that is CAF finance behind me so I just deleted it all. Suffice to say, your first sentence is too generous, and I don't agree with the last sentence.

And then your subsequent posts on RDAOs triggered me. We might as well just get rid of national policies / documents like the FAMs and have Base SOPs, since the CDAO's failure actually supervise RDAOs has just led to having to re-learn every rule every time you are posted to a new RDAO's AO, or a new RDAO is posted in, or a new RDAO staff member is posted in... in other words, try to re-learn everything, every year.

Can't wait to go to work tomorrow and be surrounded by competence.
 
Not what we need. We need vast quantities of stores in the right places gathering dust and waiting to be used.

This, like LUC is great for the niceties like DEUs I'd even say CADPAT and NCDs but for operational kit this is a mistake.

Until they're obsolete, and we can't get rid of them anyways so they just sit there taking up resources for nothing, right? :)
 
This article, from 2019, is illuminating and probably reflects the fact that all political parties are more focused on what will get them votes, which means that defence is on the back burner. Even now, with Russia killing Ukrainians on a daily basis, the politicians are using various weasel words to avoid sound too 'martial'.

The problem isn't the politicians IMHO, it's that Canadians don't care about defence.

For example, Roosevelt struggled to get the US involved in WW2 and it wasn't until Pearl Harbour, when the public were galvanized to enter the war against Japan 2 years after the Germans invaded Poland, that he was able to act on public sentiments. And they still had to wait until Germany declared war on the US to enter the fight against Germany.

We might see similar dynamics play out here:

Amid global unrest, Canada's political parties say little about security, defence​


In order to know what most of the major parties think about the uncertain state of the world, and Canada's place in it, you have to dig — really dig — to find it.

The ideas, solutions and proposals around security and defence from the Liberals, New Democrats and the Green Party are buried, in some cases, at the very back of their platform documents. The Conservatives released their detailed platform plank on Tuesday.

The relative positioning of the policy pitches — along with the dearth of debate about the turbulence beyond the country's borders — has alarmed defence policy experts who say now is not the time for politics as usual.

"This is the time we need the clearest, most strategic thinking since the end of the Second World War, in terms of how we do Canadian security," said Rob Huebert, a defence expert at the University of Calgary. "It is not an exaggeration to say we are on the cusp of the most dangerous geopolitical environment we've seen in our lifetime."

Here's the rub. We don't need clear thinking at all about defense. We can continue to muddle on with no understanding of geopolitics and have no defense budget because we are likely the only place in the world that only fights in wars because we want too.

Since 1812 there hasn't been a single conflict that we entered that wasn't essentially voluntary. Boer War and WW1 we were roped in because of Empire obligations but really we didn't have to go if we didn't want to. And every single conflict since has been more and more voluntary.

We have no existential threats. We have no enemies. We have no external continental interests which require us to fight a war (aka are so critical to national interests we have to spend treasure and blood to ensure they continue as they are). All that is taken care of by the US. So as long as we don't mind them paying the freight we can sit here fat and happy.

Kitchen table issues drive voters. In Ukraine the kitchen table issue was Russia. The current Canadian equivalent is mask mandates. We are so safe we can afford to be soft on defense. And so parties will say what they need to for the current soundbite and move on to things that really drive voters.
 
Until they're obsolete, and we can't get rid of them anyways so they just sit there taking up resources for nothing, right? :)

That's all part of life cycle management. The part once it reaches obsolescence is either disposed according to policies of sold off through CADC.

No argument we can be better, that's exactly what I want.

Step one acknowledge the importance of the Supply chain and man it and fund it to be robust and strong.
 
Way to open up my old wounds. I was writing a big long post in response to this, and then remembered that part of releasing was that I would leave the utter catastrophe that is CAF finance behind me so I just deleted it all. Suffice to say, your first sentence is too generous, and I don't agree with the last sentence.

And then your subsequent posts on RDAOs triggered me. We might as well just get rid of national policies / documents like the FAMs and have Base SOPs, since the CDAO's failure actually supervise RDAOs has just led to having to re-learn every rule every time you are posted to a new RDAO's AO, or a new RDAO is posted in, or a new RDAO staff member is posted in... in other words, try to re-learn everything, every year.

Can't wait to go to work tomorrow and be surrounded by competence.

Sorry - I rewrote and made it unclear - a LCol+ finance officer needs to understand the estimates process and ARLU, since the majority are in NDHQ and engaged in staff processes where those are relevant.

Not necessary knowledge for a Lt fresh from Borden.

(The lack of competence in compensation administration is a whole other topic of discussion)
 
Back
Top