• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Good news for older applicants, no age limit now,

www.dhs.gov

Secretary Noem Unveils No Age Limit for Patriotic Americans to Join ICE Law Enforcement to Help Remove Worst of the Worst from U.S. | Homeland Security

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem announced U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will waive age limits for new applicants so even more patriots will qualify to join ICE in its mission to arrest murderers, pedophiles, gang members, rapists, and other criminal illegal aliens from America’s streets.
www.dhs.gov www.dhs.gov

Secretary Noem Unveils No Age Limit for Patriotic Americans to Join ICE Law Enforcement to Help Remove Worst of the Worst from U.S.
Release Date: August 6, 2025
 
mariomike said:
Good news for older applicants, no age limit now,

www.dhs.gov

Secretary Noem Unveils No Age Limit for Patriotic Americans to Join ICE Law Enforcement to Help Remove Worst of the Worst from U.S. | Homeland Security

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem announced U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will waive age limits for new applicants so even more patriots will qualify to join ICE in its mission to arrest murderers, pedophiles, gang members, rapists, and other criminal illegal aliens from America’s streets.
www.dhs.gov www.dhs.gov

Secretary Noem Unveils No Age Limit for Patriotic Americans to Join ICE Law Enforcement to Help Remove Worst of the Worst from U.S.
Release Date: August 6, 2025
Click to expand...
I searched 'elderly man in uniform' to post an image. I got this. It'll do.

1754599430938.png
 
Another case of Trump supporter discovering they are one the undesirables that they supported cleansing from the nation.

www.euronews.com

Owner of Donald Trump-themed restaurant faces deportation by ICE

Food and politics clearly don’t mix... The owner of a Texas restaurant group that celebrates Donald Trump is facing immigration enforcement. Here’s everything you need to know.
www.euronews.com www.euronews.com
 
McG said:
Another case of Trump supporter discovering they are one the undesirables that they supported cleansing from the nation.

www.euronews.com

Owner of Donald Trump-themed restaurant faces deportation by ICE

Food and politics clearly don’t mix... The owner of a Texas restaurant group that celebrates Donald Trump is facing immigration enforcement. Here’s everything you need to know.
www.euronews.com www.euronews.com
Click to expand...
There’s a lot of “if only the Tsar knew what was happening!” going on…
 
McG said:
Normalizing more democratic backsliding and also the annexation of Canadian provinces on the path to rigging elections. Our southern neighbour is now Russia.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1953572988336681076
Click to expand...
Its clips like that that should be played again and again whenever someone in Canada says that we shouldn't be spending more on the CAF to increase numbers and capabilities.
 
Czech_pivo said:
Its clips like that that should be played again and again whenever someone in Canada says that we shouldn't be spending more on the CAF to increase numbers and capabilities.
Click to expand...
Threats ought to first be serious if they're to be taken seriously.

The current brouhaha over gerrymandering exists mainly because Democrats have already collected most of what they can and Republicans have room to improve; so, Democrats are angry and in "how dare you do what we did" mode.
 
Brad Sallows said:
Threats ought to first be serious if they're to be taken seriously.

The current brouhaha over gerrymandering exists mainly because Democrats have already collected most of what they can and Republicans have room to improve; so, Democrats are angry and in "how dare you do what we did" mode.
Click to expand...
Its the fact that these individuals even have this sort of thought process on their mind.

Imagine if a bunch of tv personalities said the same thing on German evening news about Poland or the Czech Republic?
How about a bunch of Brits on the Sky News saying something similar about the Republic of Ireland?
 
Czech_pivo said:
Imagine if a bunch of tv personalities said the same thing on German evening news about Poland or the Czech Republic?
Click to expand...
Wouldn’t want to be working in a tiny radio station on the border, just to be on the safe side ;)
Czech_pivo said:
How about a bunch of Brits on the Sky News saying something similar about the Republic of Ireland?
Click to expand...
Sinn Fein enters the chat …
 
Czech_pivo said:
Its the fact that these individuals even have this sort of thought process on their mind.

Imagine if a bunch of tv personalities said the same thing on German evening news about Poland or the Czech Republic?
How about a bunch of Brits on the Sky News saying something similar about the Republic of Ireland?
Click to expand...
"My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes."
 
Brad Sallows said:
"My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes."
Click to expand...
LOL, not his best moment.
But to be fair, it was a joke. Do you think those on the Fox newscast thought what they were saying was a joke? That one woman at the end going on about Greenland looked like she was all set to storm the walls herself.
 
Czech_pivo said:
LOL, not his best moment.
But to be fair, it was a joke. Do you think those on the Fox newscast thought what they were saying was a joke? That one woman at the end going on about Greenland looked like she was all set to storm the walls herself.
Click to expand...
There's a spectrum from "joke" to "serious". Some who chime in just want a TV moment.
 
Brad Sallows said:
Threats ought to first be serious if they're to be taken seriously.

The current brouhaha over gerrymandering exists mainly because Democrats have already collected most of what they can and Republicans have room to improve; so, Democrats are angry and in "how dare you do what we did" mode.
Click to expand...
Threats ought to be taken seriously if there is the means to follow through on them.

Gerrymandering has been done by both sides in the States for a while. The difference between now and historically is they used to pretend they weren’t just trying to rig the election (i.e. wait until census changes, etc.).

What blows my mind is instead of attempting to act in a non-partisan manner or at least pretending to they are just straight up stating they which to deny the voters proper democracy.

Things like this lead to civil wars as the more excluded the political landscape becomes the more likely someone is willing to try and completely break the system.
 
Eaglelord17 said:
Gerrymandering has been done by both sides in the States for a while. The difference between now and historically is they used to pretend they weren’t just trying to rig the election (i.e. wait until census changes, etc.).
Click to expand...
That's not a difference worth anything. The only meaningful difference is that Republican-controlled states still have room to gerrymander some more. When Democrats in heavily gerrymandered "blue" states are openly criticizing Republicans without exhibiting any apparent sense of shame, they obviously need to be f*cked over hard to come to their senses (if indeed they ever can).

I've written before that I like corruption and slimey-but-legal right out where I can see it, not hidden by nice suits and good manners and civility and decorum blah blah blah. I don't distinguish between one and the other; to me, they are equal. The people of the past get no credit for their deceit; it's not a "norm" worth restoring. The sooner more people see how things really are, the more likely useful reform - under pressure from voters - becomes.

The "good people" and "distinterested experts" in charge have had decades to make changes that "practically everyone" thinks would be positive and righteous. It's taken the bulls in the china shop to effect any. That suggests the former have never really been "good" or "disinterested".
 
Brad Sallows said:
That's not a difference worth anything. The only meaningful difference is that Republican-controlled states still have room to gerrymander some more. When Democrats in heavily gerrymandered "blue" states are openly criticizing Republicans without exhibiting any apparent sense of shame, they obviously need to be f*cked over hard to come to their senses (if indeed they ever can).

I've written before that I like corruption and slimey-but-legal right out where I can see it, not hidden by nice suits and good manners and civility and decorum blah blah blah. I don't distinguish between one and the other; to me, they are equal. The people of the past get no credit for their deceit; it's not a "norm" worth restoring. The sooner more people see how things really are, the more likely useful reform - under pressure from voters - becomes.

The "good people" and "distinterested experts" in charge have had decades to make changes that "practically everyone" thinks would be positive and righteous. It's taken the bulls in the china shop to effect any. That suggests the former have never really been "good" or "disinterested".
Click to expand...
There are democrat states with lots of room to gerrymander as well, both are wrong though. Generally speaking the Republicans benefit more from gerrymandering in the States than the Democrats (though both do benefit from it).

They should be trying to cut down on the corruption (which gerrymandering essentially is) not increase it. Why the voters tolerate it is beyond me.

As much as I detest Musk if he does get a third party going which actually tries to restore things to how they are supposed to be (i.e. no wars without congressional approval, cut down on corruption, hammer into the two party system, etc.) then they have a chance to move towards a better democracy. Right now they are sliding away from that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top