KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 27,576
- Points
- 1,260
Hit doesn’t mean kill in this case.Is an 11% probability of a hit with a $1000 munition such a bad ratio?
It is a question of resources.And if it engages the enemy, has them runninng in circles, wasting ammunition, distracting them, aborting their action - harassing, suppressing and neutralizing them isn't that still contributing a useful effect to the battlespace?
We covered this before on other threads.
If a Javelin has a Pk of 95+% and is $175k
Does a system that has a Pk under 5% that costs 15k a better deal?
What are the logistical challenges;
For 100 Javelin missiles or 25,000 FOV drones
Opportunity cost is tough to know / maybe a 120mm Mortar would be more effective? Especially in all weather conditions.Even if all it does is help 3 Ukrainians in a hole to hold a km of line and keep the otherside from advancing - holding them to a stalemate. That would seem to me to be enhancing economy of force efforts.
The difference is the FPV are guided....
How many SAA rounds are put down range to achieve one hit?
Mortar rounds?
Grad rounds?
Even dumb artillery rounds and bombs.
Brimstone is not LRPF.....
To be clear, I will restate that I am not in favour of replacing conventional weapons with "drones". I do believe that "drones" will follow Moore's Law and get smaller, faster, cheaper and more effective and become a greater part of everyone's arsenal.
I also think that the new divisional structure is going to look a lot like the WW2 divisional sructure, particularly the inclusion of Light Anti-Aircraft Regiments (20mm and 40mm) and Anti-Tank Regiments (17 Pdr) with the Divisional Artillery
LAA becomes C-UAS (20 to 40 mm, SAMs, DE and EW)
AT becomes LRPF (Assault Breakers - LAMs, Brimstones and MFOM)
I think you have gone tangentially sideways on the tank thread.