• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

I have no doubt a civilian buyer will snap them up if the price is right, gutted of all the electronics and comms stuff.
They have a notably heavier basic (empty) weight that a standard non-fit by wire, non-tail/main blade folding S-92. I’m with @dapaterson, I think there would be few if any takers to buy them, other than DoD. I would bet they sit out the remainder of their existence at Davis-Monthan in the field.
 
They have a notably heavier basic (empty) weight that a standard non-fit by wire, non-tail/main blade folding S-92. I’m with @dapaterson, I think there would be few if any takers to buy them, other than DoD. I would bet they sit out the remainder of their existence at Davis-Monthan in the field.
Maybe we go with what Australia did, and bury them in an old mine shaft and then fill it up with sand (and probably crikey snakes.🐍).
 
They have a notably heavier basic (empty) weight that a standard non-fit by wire, non-tail/main blade folding S-92. I’m with @dapaterson, I think there would be few if any takers to buy them, other than DoD. I would bet they sit out the remainder of their existence at Davis-Monthan in the field.

Or, in the time honoured CAF tradition, they create a reservist RCAF rotary wing squadron and give them all to the Militia ;)
 
No supply chain for parts makes me suspect they would be less inclined to do so.

They have a notably heavier basic (empty) weight that a standard non-fit by wire, non-tail/main blade folding S-92. I’m with @dapaterson, I think there would be few if any takers to buy them, other than DoD. I would bet they sit out the remainder of their existence at Davis-Monthan in the field.

Really useful if Sikorsky wants to use the frames to do a whole lot of engineering work to make a medium-heavy helicopter they can sell to military clients in the future. They can finish all the developmental work they should have done before selling us this one.
 
They have a notably heavier basic (empty) weight that a standard non-fit by wire, non-tail/main blade folding S-92. I’m with @dapaterson, I think there would be few if any takers to buy them, other than DoD. I would bet they sit out the remainder of their existence at Davis-Monthan in the field.
OR melt down the metal bits and make useful things from them - like KFS for the troops.
 
Or, in the time honoured CAF tradition, they create a reservist RCAF rotary wing squadron and give them all to the Militia ;)
Already done (400/438) and working well enough, just not given to the Army PRes to screw up…

Really useful if Sikorsky wants to use the frames to do a whole lot of engineering work to make a medium-heavy helicopter they can sell to military clients in the future. They can finish all the developmental work they should have done before selling us this one.

I’m pretty sure the SIK lost desire in marketing the MILSUPERHAWK a couple decades ago…
 
I’m pretty sure the SIK lost desire in marketing the MILSUPERHAWK a couple decades ago…

The S-92 is commercially successful. It's just the Cyclone that has struggled. They probably would have gotten more military sales of the H-92 if the Cyclone was more successful. There's a lot of valuable capability in a medium lift helicopter with a ramp.
 
The S-92 is commercially successful. It's just the Cyclone that has struggled. They probably would have gotten more military sales of the H-92 if the Cyclone was more successful. There's a lot of valuable capability in a medium lift helicopter with a ramp.
Unfortunately it became a lemon, and lemons are liabilities, which can get people killed. We dont even have all of them delivered yet, its ridiculous.
 
Unfortunately it became a lemon, and lemons are liabilities, which can get people killed. We dont even have all of them delivered yet, its ridiculous.
It was never not a lemon. We bought and paid for a experimental unproven aircraft instead of a proven guaranteed product.

So far it has cost us 6 people.

Someone should be showing up at Chretiens doorstep and tossing their names at it. The cadillac wouldn’t have had this problem.
 
It was never not a lemon. We bought and paid for a experimental unproven aircraft instead of a proven guaranteed product.

So far it has cost us 6 people.

Someone should be showing up at Chretiens doorstep and tossing their names at it. The cadillac wouldn’t have had this problem.

Just wondering... how many Senior Officers resigned in protest over being forced to adopt it into service against the best advice available?
 
Back
Top