• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
Transporting heavy and bulky ore 2100km through the rockies is one thing, going 280km to Swan River or 400km to Dauphin across the prairies with minor hills is another. Both are already tied in to Tisdale on the CN main line. Just spitballing either way.
The best solution I suspect will depend upon the when of development. Kitimat is already there and can start quickly so that balances out some of the expenses of transportation, plus it boasts access to the entire Asia market. Dauphin could certainly us the industry and would be good once everything was in place so I am guessing that the timing on getting the product to market will dictate the next move.
 
Reporting is a little confusing. Graphics scream 'Line 5' but reporter says not. According to Enbridge, Line 5 is not a compressed natural gas line, but does carry "natural gas liquids".
 

Copying this over from the BC Politics page.

But I quickly scanned this and had to wonder what people were thinking when developing the program if it's accurate. Lets design a government program designed to take 50% of the producers net profits as Royalties? So industry puts up all the risk, costs etc. and still pays a 50%? tax.

I am all for responsive royalty rates that adjust in accordance for market conditions...but they must be rapidly changing and transparent mechanisms.

Next door to this proposal is Alberta which apparently is 5% until well cumaltive revenue = cost of drilling/completion. Rates then increase, product dependent from 5-40% depending on commodity price and well maturity.

Next is Saskatchewan at what appears to be 2.5% rates for initial production up to 25 million m3.

Where would you invest if you're a company?

Just makes me shake my head sometimes over why folks think that eating the golden goose will create more geese in future. A better beer discussion is what is the appropriate rate as you can see there is a wide range and what calculation method is best....but companies won't invest in more products if they 're not going to make money.
 
So... A "parked" truck hit controversial pipeline in the middle of a trade war...

Maybe I'm a bit too pessimistic, but how can this be played against Canada/Ontario?
Well the work is obviously going to have to pause on this site...

"Hey guys, take 5...smoke 'em if you got 'em"

NO, WAIT!
 

Copying this over from the BC Politics page.

But I quickly scanned this and had to wonder what people were thinking when developing the program if it's accurate. Lets design a government program designed to take 50% of the producers net profits as Royalties? So industry puts up all the risk, costs etc. and still pays a 50%? tax.

I am all for responsive royalty rates that adjust in accordance for market conditions...but they must be rapidly changing and transparent mechanisms.

Next door to this proposal is Alberta which apparently is 5% until well cumaltive revenue = cost of drilling/completion. Rates then increase, product dependent from 5-40% depending on commodity price and well maturity.

Next is Saskatchewan at what appears to be 2.5% rates for initial production up to 25 million m3.

Where would you invest if you're a company?

Just makes me shake my head sometimes over why folks think that eating the golden goose will create more geese in future. A better beer discussion is what is the appropriate rate as you can see there is a wide range and what calculation method is best....but companies won't invest in more products if they 're not going to make money.
The BC NDP hates the oil and gas industry with the passion of a thousand fiery suns.

That is all.

Job loss? Holes in the provincial budget that you could drive an aircraft carrier through?

Whatever, as long as we are dogmatically pure.
 
The BC NDP hates the oil and gas industry with the passion of a thousand fiery suns.

That is all.

Job loss? Holes in the provincial budget that you could drive an aircraft carrier through?

Whatever, as long as we are dogmatically pure.

That would align with my previous experiences in BC. And in BC Forestry. Just out of date on the current policies but makes a person shake their head to say the least.
 
Back
Top