• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

None of the major news outlets have picked this up, so it may in the end be nothing more than "conjecture", but boys oh boys if it's true.

Would it be Vance going behind Trump's back?
Or
Trump using Vance to purposfuuly leak the story expressly so that they could ban Politico?

 
None of the major news outlets have picked this up, so it may in the end be nothing more than "conjecture", but boys oh boys if it's true.

Would it be Vance going behind Trump's back?
Or
Trump using Vance to purposfuuly leak the story expressly so that they could ban Politico?

Status News is generally regarded as a factual left-center outlet that hasn’t failed any fact-checks. It also has covered negative aspects of politicians in the left as well, so there may be some fire here. I guess we’ll know more if it unfolds or disappears

 
None of the major news outlets have picked this up, so it may in the end be nothing more than "conjecture", but boys oh boys if it's true.

Would it be Vance going behind Trump's back?
Or
Trump using Vance to purposfuuly leak the story expressly so that they could ban Politico?

1790281764018.png
 
I'm confused. If by "leaker" you mean the 'unnamed senior official" that "leaked" information about an impending Iran deal, it has been established that the unnamed official was Vance, and all reporters in the room were told to refer to him as an unnamed senior administration official. Trump used that instance in the legal submissions as proof that the outlet in question was a national security risk.

What am I missing?
 
Didn't The Netherlands just repatriate a horde from Canada back to the Old Country?

From earlier this month

The Dutch central bank announced Wednesday (Sep 2) that it has moved billions of dollars worth of its gold reserves out of North America in a move it described as “crisis preparedness” in a time of global political unrest.

It said that between March and August, some 86 metric tons of gold were transferred to London from the combined total of around 313 metric tons held in New York and Ottawa. Before the move, New York housed 31.3 per cent of the Dutch gold and Ottawa held 19.7 per cent. After the move, both cities now hold 18.5 per cent, the bank said.

The bank owns 612.4 metric tons of gold that was worth €72.2-billion (about US$83.6-billion) at the end of 2025.
 
From earlier this month


A bit of a stereotype, IMHO ;)

Austin Powers Love GIF
 
AI’s take on this week’s Treasury auction of 2, 5 and 7-year treasury notes. Vegas bookies are betting it’s going to get worse…5-year notes are the ‘belly’ of the Treasury’s offerings to help service the federal debt.

📌 2-Year Note: The "Policy Path" Safe Haven
The short-term $69 billion auction cleared cleanly. The bid-to-cover ratio of 2.63x edged out its previous historical baseline, and the 0.2 basis point tail was practically negligible ("on the screws"). Front-end investors were comfortable locking in yields near 4.79% because the front-end remains heavily anchored by the immediate Federal Reserve terminal rate trajectory. [1, 2, 3]

⚠️ 5-Year Note: The Epicentre of the Sell-off
The $70 billion 5-year auction was a statistical disaster, labeled one of the weakest sales since 2018. Investors flat-out rejected pre-auction trading levels, forcing a gargantuan 3.1 basis point tail over the 5.002% when-issued yield. The bid-to-cover collapsed to 2.21x, requiring Primary Dealers to heavily absorb the unsold supply. [1, 2, 3]

📉 7-Year Note: The Expected Spillover
Suffering from the negative momentum of the 5-year sale, the 7-year note cleared at 5.085%, marking a 33-year high dating back to April 1993. Demand indicators lagged across the board with a weak 2.42x bid-to-cover and a telling 0.7 bps tail, confirming that international buyers (indirect bidders) pulled back their participation. [1, 2, 3]




📈 How This Affected Current Bond Market Assessments

These successive failures outside the immediate short-term space have profoundly shifted consensus trading narratives in a few distinct ways:
  • Re-pricing the Supply "Term Premium": The primary driver of this week's breakdown isn't just the Fed—it's pure fiscal physics. Markets are waking up to the reality that the massive deluge of intermediate coupon supply ($183 billion auctioned in three days) is overwhelming organic market demand. Investors are aggressively demanding a steeper "term premium" (extra yield concession) to step in and absorb federal deficits. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Severe Curve Steepening & The 5% Threshold: Following the 5-year failure, intermediate yields violently broke out. For the first time in years, a massive portion of the intermediate belly of the curve shifted above 5.00%. The broader 10-year Treasury has also climbed over 5.14% as global sell-offs feed into domestic debt. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
  • "Higher-for-Longer" Cemented by Inflation Fears: The fact that the intermediate belly bore the brunt of the damage reflects escalating, energy-sensitive long-term inflation expectations. Bond desks are positioning for a stickier economic reality where yields must stay structurally high, reducing the expected tally of future Fed rate cuts. [1, 2, 3]
 
Figure out why so many successful people around the world want to go to the US. Emulate that to the best of our ability. This is radical, I know, because it would mean rethinking our economic policies.
Are you sure that assertion still stands true?

They offer the opportunity to be a fish in a much larger pond. On Reflection that Pond is in decay and die mode.

No point boarding the Titanic just before it sinks because "it is a bigger and more luxurious boat...
 
Last edited:
Are you sure that assertion still stands true?

They offer the opportunity to be a fish in a much larger pond. On Reflection that Pond is in decay and die mode.

No point boarding the Titanic just as before it sinks because "it is a bigger and more luxurios boat...
Yes and No

The opportunity to be the 'big fish' in the 'big pond' in the US affords you many many privileges that will keep you from venturing into the area of the pond that is stagnating and polluted. Wealth in the US, real wealth, gives you the chance to live in gated communities that never see or deal with poverty, slums, or the general 'riff raff' driving, walking, biking through where you live. The 'riff raff' never get a chance to get through the guarded gate with the armed guards. Out of sight, out of mind.

You can venture into other privilege towns like Greenwich CT, or Atherton CA or out in the Hamptons like Sagaponack or East Hampton. A person looking to be the 'big fish' can live among other big fish (there are so many), have their kids attend private schools (they like to call them 'Academies') scattered across New England (like Phillips Exeter or Choate Rosemary, where its something like over 70k USD a yr for grade 9 boarding/tuition). Fly in your own private jet, never having to sit in the airport boarding area with the pretend rich flying first class and rub shoulders with the peasants flying economy.

For them being on 'the Titanic' really doesn't matter because they will simply have their private helicopter come and hover over the first class area and simply remove them from danger before it even becomes apparent to the rest of the passengers.

Their wealth is mobile, it can go wherever they want it to go. Their connections are endless and open doors closed to the rest of us. Their loyalty is transient as is their citizenship. Being a 'big fish' in the US is the ultimate 'get of out jail free' card. Its why so many around the world want it.
 
Yes and No

The opportunity to be the 'big fish' in the 'big pond' in the US affords you many many privileges that will keep you from venturing into the area of the pond that is stagnating and polluted. Wealth in the US, real wealth, gives you the chance to live in gated communities that never see or deal with poverty, slums, or the general 'riff raff' driving, walking, biking through where you live. The 'riff raff' never get a chance to get through the guarded gate with the armed guards. Out of sight, out of mind.

You can venture into other privilege towns like Greenwich CT, or Atherton CA or out in the Hamptons like Sagaponack or East Hampton. A person looking to be the 'big fish' can live among other big fish (there are so many), have their kids attend private schools (they like to call them 'Academies') scattered across New England (like Phillips Exeter or Choate Rosemary, where its something like over 70k USD a yr for grade 9 boarding/tuition). Fly in your own private jet, never having to sit in the airport boarding area with the pretend rich flying first class and rub shoulders with the peasants flying economy.

For them being on 'the Titanic' really doesn't matter because they will simply have their private helicopter come and hover over the first class area and simply remove them from danger before it even becomes apparent to the rest of the passengers.

Their wealth is mobile, it can go wherever they want it to go. Their connections are endless and open doors closed to the rest of us. Their loyalty is transient as is their citizenship. Being a 'big fish' in the US is the ultimate 'get of out jail free' card. Its why so many around the world want it.

The 'brain drain' is real, and largely connected with employment opportunities.

Canadian Immigrants in the United States​


Canadian immigrants in the United States tend to be older, highly educated, and among the highest-earning foreign-born groups. Their numbers have been generally static in recent decades.

  • About 828,000 Canadian-born immigrants lived in the United States as of 2023, accounting for less than 2 percent of all U.S. immigrants. This figure has remained relatively static over time.
  • Median household income for Canadian immigrants was $104,300 in 2023, well above the $78,700 for all immigrant households and $77,600 for households led by the U.S. born.
  • Canadians enter the United States primarily through employment channels (45 percent of green cards in FY 2023).
  • Amid U.S. tariff threats and annexation rhetoric from the Trump administration, many Canadians curtailed travel to the United States. Longer-term effects on immigration and bilateral ties remained to be determined.

 
Therein lies the problem. The US is a great place to be if you have wealth and influence. If you are an average Joe or Joanne, the overall feel must be quite Hobbesian.

In keeping with the OP here is a comparison between US and Canada:

  • 350K USD will get you into the top 5% of earners. In Canada the threshold is 162K CAD, and 294K CAD will get you into the top 1%..
  • According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the typical full-time worker in the US earned a median wage of $1,235 per week in the first quarter of 2026, which would total about $64,220 per year
  • In Canada, the Full-Time Worker Median: Estimated around $60,000 – $62,000 as wage growth adjusts for recent economic conditions

So...the rich are much richer in the US, but the median income is close to identical between the two countries. Distribution of wealth matters.....
 
Therein lies the problem. The US is a great place to be if you have wealth and influence. If you are an average Joe or Joanne, the overall feel must be quite Hobbesian.

In keeping with the OP here is a comparison between US and Canada:

  • 350K USD will get you into the top 5% of earners. In Canada the threshold is 162K CAD, and 294K CAD will get you into the top 1%..
  • According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the typical full-time worker in the US earned a median wage of $1,235 per week in the first quarter of 2026, which would total about $64,220 per year
  • In Canada, the Full-Time Worker Median: Estimated around $60,000 – $62,000 as wage growth adjusts for recent economic conditions

So...the rich are much richer in the US, but the median income is close to identical between the two countries. Distribution of wealth matters.....
100% it does.

There are also a lot more people in the US that have access to annual 'income' that is NOT related to a W2 income (a T4 in Canada). They have much more robust opportunities to shelter and structure their 'income' from paying taxes associated with a traditional wage income. This creates a much much large pool of individuals living with high 'income levels' who really don't appear on the 'earned income' charts.

Have a look at the guy who wrote the book 'Rich Dad Poor Dad' and how much debt this guy carries and how his assets, debt, income is all structured to allow him to be a 'big fish' and live in those gated communities and such. He's just a single example but he represents tens of thousand, if not a few hundreds of thousands of Americans just like him. Do you think Canadian's have that ability? Do you think that there are more than a few dozen here in Canada that live like that?

So back to your points above. If your intelligent, ambitious and willing to put in some effort/hard work, it really doesn't take that much to be in that top 5% here in Canada. So, given that, if you pop your head over the fence and look south and you see that maybe with the same amount of effort, ambition and some extra hard work that you could parley that into another 100k or 250k or 1million a year would you not want to take that chance? I mean why not? You can always return back to Canada and go back to putting in the same amount of effort and slide right back into the top 5%? Nothing ventured, nothing gained, right?
 
Back
Top