It also tells you something about how far the Country has come since the 80s . If you had suggested then that the Navy was even considering conventionally armed cruise missiles. The nation was would have had a collective stroke.
You have to get people involved I don't care what the organization does. People perform better if they have some understanding of what everybody else does and how they fit into the puzzle as it were.
One of my fears and it may just be paranoia .
But what if Putin mentions casually .... that however Trump wished to resolve whatever border issues that Trump had with Canada .
Would most certainly not be any of Russia's business.
Sykes-Picot indeed.
I'm surprised at the possibility of IRA threats .I would have thought that going after a prominent Canadian target would have been counter productive ?
One of the reasons I have tended to prefer American equipment aside from advanced technologies and scales of manufacturing. As well as shorter delivery distance is all of their equipment is designed to operate over 90 % of the world's conditions and terrain.
Which coincidentally pretty much...
I only note that the Rush - Bagot treaty only prohibits guns exceeding 6 pounds in shell weight. It says nothing at all about SLBMs
Or 21" torpedoes.
I just thought I'd leave that out there.... food for thought. 😉
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.