The CAF has gotten used to adding a hundred or so people in places like Halifax, Ottawa or Winnipeg (plus families).
That sort of growth in Northern communities has a far greater second and third order impact.
In the late 1990s I recall reading a review of defence procurement that notes that one Canadian supplier was merely a drop shipper for an American manufacturer, with a 100% "Canadian" markup.
The goal is to balance policy objectives with compliance costs.
The main reason for the Feds to avoid entering into this space is to avoid having to decide what's more important - a fire threatening Halifax or a fire threatening Moose Jaw.
Give resources to provinces, support inter-provincial cooperation - fantastic way for the feds to address the problem...
Why only people accused of home invasion? (By court costs I assume you mean the cost of a legal defence, which is easily in the low six figures if it goes to trial - or the mid five figures if it does not).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.