Search results

no you won't be able to please everyone, but the default shouldn't be 'Boo freaking ooh !!' or 'Get out' Well, pray tell what is it? I for one only worry about things I can possibly change and never give up. I definitely don't use 'hope' or 'ignore it and it will go away" as COAs

I guess one man's crap is another man's bread and butter, however I do not concede to there is no end in sight. I see crap as, doing things that do not contribute to the mission. Things that extend the work day so even when you get to sleep in your own bed, thats all you do sleep. As for QOL...

That is probably the most frustrating, being told there is no end in sight. Some solutions; -Prioritize work and get rid of unneccessary crap. -Shorten courses by "no-training" portions, instead of increasing the training day. -Utilize re-coursing, instead of reteaching evenings and weekends for...

Just like we tend to train for previous wars, we continue to recruit for previous generations. If the potential recruits are different, then we have to find a different methods for recruiting. As for their potential for military service, they work out just fine.

Maybe recruits are finally getting 82 pattern rucks and CF Gloves. Maybe C1A2s next year. ;D

The Constr Engrs (formerly known as AF Engr) is always looking for more. The change was also driven by the fact they can be involved in Ops across all elements, land, air and sea, not just on an airfield.

Ah, I just love that line, "get out" instead of actually addressing the observation.

Good for you

And PERs are never inflated

If it was only true - He'll probably get promoted before the PER is written

sure why not. I did forget that the reserves is also a retirement plan for double dippers I'd say it is basically a tactical grouping of administrative/ logistic services okay got ya

I thought the Bears were in Chicago

Are sub-units named in a CFOO?

Thanks for the references, I didn't have access to it here. My understanding is any units named Airfield under the CFOOs will have to go through an official change.

Airfield Engineers are now known as Construction Engineers

I think we should switch to a) Did done good b) Didn't done very good c) Did bloody awful

I heard it got sent back because it was 2 pages

Its no different then those who say that we have to re-invent the wheel in order to get anywhere. Sorry but we were discussing that 20 years ago, and I'm sure that it was discussed before that. btw, the superbase consolidation of services aren't exactly for effectiveness, its because their...

I've never agreed that amalgamations was the issue even back then. The reserves in the past 20 years have already been a farm team for the regs.

I'm not suggesting it be a hobby service. I'm saying I know lots of reg force members that joined the reserves first to see whether they would like it, instead of commiting to a BE. Although its a good thing that there were weekend warriors during the bleak years, as it appears they are needed now