The SAR community has a bias toward doing mountain valley searches, which are a tonne of fun, I grant you.
Not that we are going back in time anymore, but an all C130J fleet (even if it was too much aircraft for some scenarios) would have been nice. I wonder if we could have hung a sensor pod...
Far from it.
But, having instructed both at the OTU and the Nav School level for half a decade, I have a bit of clue about some of the complexities involved in aircrew training.
Some of the problem has been a reluctance to invest in modern training devices. Thankfully, that is starting to go...
What about them? They are not CAF.
They come from the old Coast Guard Auxiliary and only exist in BC.
I was merely trying to remind everyone, as they debate the role of FWSAR, which part of SAR the CAF is responsible to do.
I am agnostic about the second part of your sentence, but the fact that they both made it public and made a specific allegation against China means there is something there.
It is useful, at this point, to remind everyone, that the CAF is responsible to handle to two types of SAR events:
Events involving aircraft (aviation SAR)
Events involving boats and ships (maritime SAR)
Events that involve lost hikers (Ground SAR) or medevacs (that aren’t caused by aviation...
In a world where kill switches are being found by the Danes and the Swedes in chinese built buses and the Israelis found spyware in their chinese built electric cars, BC ferries “brilliant” plan is to let China build ferries?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.