That blog was a complete waste of time. So what should Canada’s bold new governing spirit do? (other than engage international markets to diversify and reinforce solidarity with like-minded western democracies like support for Ukraine and Greenland/Denmark, neither of which Shurma mentions)...
Already done (400/438) and working well enough, just not given to the Army PRes to screw up…
I’m pretty sure the SIK lost desire in marketing the MILSUPERHAWK a couple decades ago…
They have a notably heavier basic (empty) weight that a standard non-fit by wire, non-tail/main blade folding S-92. I’m with @dapaterson, I think there would be few if any takers to buy them, other than DoD. I would bet they sit out the remainder of their existence at Davis-Monthan in the field.
Which is different than the aforementioned article upthread, which refers specifically only to the nTACS program, which has not designated a specific platform or manufacturer.
And interestingly, it appears that the regime has been (allegedly) transferring its gold reserves to a safe(r) place for the last month.
https://united24media.com/latest-news/irans-gold-allegedly-flown-to-russia-as-supreme-leader-braces-for-collapse-14889
Following Denmark’s lead, then? 😉
How bad does a nation have to be that soldiers’ families place greater trust in ‘the enemy’ to find out about their loved ones? 🤔
Are you actually making the case that fleet size for defending Canadian airspace for decades into the future should be constrained by today’s quantity of pilots type-qualified?
Locally produced Gripen would still be US ITAR-controlled.
The James M. Flaherty building is not 100+ times smaller than Carling Campus.
Carling Campus is just three (3) times larger than TB’s building…207,000m2 vs 70,000m2
To add a bit of whataboutistic flair, Place du Portage in...
Halliburton CEO sitting beside Trump when he told him tha they pulled out of Venezuela back in 2019. Trumps asks, “why did you pull out?” Halliburton CEO pauses for a moment, then diplomatically says, “because of the sanctions…”
Perhaps learning from the USMCA “We have to fix it. Whoever...
Not sure how “only that” characterizes specific actions that reinforce visibility on the wider and more expansively systemic issues with Canadian procurement. So it’s ’the Sub-Departmental group had behaved thusly so we’ll ignore the centre and key department’s very questionable (policy...
It wasn’t the CAF/RCAF deciding that Thales was to be paid out after it exchanged its originally-bid candidate system with its Ground master 400 radar that was non-compliant, even when everybody (including TB/TBS and then PWGSC) knew that the LM TPS-77 was the cheapest, lowest-cost compliant system.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.