Search results

if they were formerly restricted shouldnt they already know about them?

i agree but at this stage i question whether Trump would veto the Gripen purchase

The Eurocanard of choice should be Rafale but the French are no fun to work with apparently

I think he orders enough F35 to keep things going no more no less and not the whole 65 or 88 in one go I dont think we get Gripens unless it ties in with some greater initiative. Public support is good but unnecessary

i think thats more pragmatic than dancing to the piper

i think the alignment is a coincidence

complications?

https://noahscornerofrandomstuff.substack.com/p/lets-talk-about-the-heavy-direct?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=95jhi&triedRedirect=true Noah with a rundown on the tank modernization status

i think its fair to say that this term is qualifiably different from the first term yes. I think PMMC goes as slow as hes possible on these things to buy as much time as he can. Im going to guess that we need to put an F35 order in at some point this year to continue some sort of sensible roll out

No, too far lol. One year of the Orange Mad King is not a reason to throw out 100 yrs it just requires some tapdancing that IMO neither Trudeau or Poilievre were capable of

Well long term restrictions on new light ICE vehicles are still on. I dont think they will be necessary but...

Im interested in the aerospace partnership, its the only reason to purchase a Gripen. A Swedish/German/Canadian 6th gen consortium beckons.

its not progressive but it might appeal to the "progressive" wing of the party I dont see how only apportioning enough money for 10% of the registered restricted firearms is a policy win

Premier Smith should just put her money where her mouth is. The project needs a proponent

we'd be better off with 72000 Carl Gustafs

if theres ca 1.3 million registered restricted firearms only 250 million in compensation for 136000 firearms so 1800 per seems high either way a lot of RPAL owners are left high and dry, never mind all the OIC banned firearms such a strange stupid program with no attempt at good faith at all

If they are only going to compensate firearm owners for the first 136000 firearms that leaves a hell of a lot of firearms and firearm owners SOL. Just on the ones that were previously Restricted. This doesnt pass any sort of fairness test at all

The letter that prompted the letter?

do they have to avoid our airspace?