Search results

When to group of people are in a riff and the political/influencers loud speachers only point out ''les anglo'' or the ''franco'' instead of trying to resolve issue, you got the situations we have. Of course there's cultural differences, I would argue that les Québecois have more anglosaxon...

Mostly agree for the working class but the Elite is way more divided then you think.

FTFY The elite is split on that and I would guess at the same 35% than the general population. They pley on emotion, so they have a bigger loud speaker.

I beg to differ. That gap/riff on cultural differences as been build in the 60-80 buy political parties surfing on the anti-colonialism of the time. To acknowledge that, you might have to first understand why it's in the constitution and be a bit open minded. Move from the political realm...

Only with curb chees 😎

Yes, and the souvrenist called that a needed sacrifice...

I suspect some of you won’t like that but, it won’t happens. It was made to show that Québec could do it, it was taken very lightly by the mainstream media and I suspect the level of support for it will not grow more. Furthermore more, a big chunk of the younger generation kind of don’t care...

If I remember well, it was written on the paper we got with the MK lll or with that black silicone that boots were not to be polished. Like @Furniture said, after trying it I got the same outcome.

Health care is in the provincial realms, same for state founded kindergarten. Now, can it be done like Canadian health care, a set of founded national standards, absolutely, not on direct founding. There a big chunk of the 2%.

I was asking myself the same thing. I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt.

My mother suffer from dementia. He doesn’t have it.

Chicken and the eggs type of thing.

I agree with you, religions per says is not bad, it’s all about the leaders. The thing is all leadership comes from within so at one point, one is the other.

Most importantly Anthony’s own reaction.

I always like the NM-72 for that exact reason. It was an SOP in my section and later platoon to fire the LAW before the attack. Then came the M-203.

In fairness, our first line for the C7 as always been 300 cartridges. We were only issued 5 mags, the rest was supposed to be in bandoliers. Yes but I still prefer to cry a bit more than to short for my confort.

At first sight, it would be better than the TAPV for some roles. Then again, it's only first impressions.

I’ll throw an idea I’m not a fan at first sight. Why not a mix fleet? There’s an opportunity to show case a good national piece of kit even if not perfect. Can one frame/vehicle type do it all, yes but at what cost. Not all units have the same needs. I’m sure there’s a place for it as much...

Of course a purposly built vehicle will be better. 'm saying that if it can do the job, why not.

And frackly, it just mean that the mines/IED/bomb under the ground will be bigger. It will always be the chicken and the egg things. Build them stronger, someone will put a bigger explosive devices under. Heavier it gets, less manœuvrable it get off-road. If the Roshel is good enought...