Search results

Although in a case such as this, I could imagine the possibility of a deal struck that would, for example, save face for the government and result in (somewhat) acceptable terms of departure for the Admiral, and include a stay or withdrawal of the charge.

Globe and Mail: "Vice-Admiral Mark Norman charged with breach of trust by RCMP" link: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/rcmp-lay-breach-of-trust-charge-against-vice-admiral-mark-norman/article38260930/ Excerpt:

Happened across this recent federal government direction: Edit to add:  That Act is not an easy find. It looks like it wasn't carried forward into the current consolidation of the statutes.  Indexed at R.S.C. 1970, c. G-12

I thought that one of the roles of a helicopter accompanying an icebreaker is to scout ahead for the best route though the ice.  Wouldn't you therefore want a helo accompanying the ship for the entire deployment?

From CBC: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/it-s-kind-of-embarrassing-3-vets-owner-uncovers-vintage-treasures-lost-for-decades-1.4411030

Would this be worn by all CANSOFCOM personnel, or just "army" personnel and not "navy" and "air force"?

Are the vehicles fueled up when they are dropped?

You will not find that in the reasons for judgment.  That is not part of what the court said.  It is not implied in the judgment.

The judge's reasons for judgment are here: http://www.ontariocourts.ca/en/24Mar16.pdf

Verdict pending on fate of Vietnam-era light attack plane [OV-10 Bronco] source: http://www.stripes.com/news/verdict-pending-on-fate-of-vietnam-era-light-attack-plane-1.399690 excerpt:

Funny - worth the read. Chris Christie’s wordless screaming Full article:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/03/02/chris-christies-wordless-screaming/?postshare=3851456967944312&tid=ss_fb

With respect, that reasoning is entirely false.  Whether you choose to stay with someone does not mean that you consented to past conduct.  An abused partner may stay on for many reasons.  It does not mean that the abuse is consented to.

This was posted on the same site as, "Interim changes to the existing Naval Combat uniform".  I threw up a little in my mouth when I saw it.  It's like the "Navy / Marine" tape is undead - it cannot be killed.  Way too much bling here.

This image was posted today on a Facebook page ("Royal Canadian Navy Today and Yesterday"), and describe as, "New Naval Combat uniform that will eventually be issued":

I feel so old.  My old beat-up Ironman is still around.

In my cursory review of the timeline, looking only at items posted by the admins of the page itself (not at comments by others), I see a picture of artillery with the phrase, "Look its [sic.] Islam over there, frig you guys", and a picture with a caption, "Merry Xmas n frig u Islam".  That was...

Necro thread, but the thread title matches the subject of this post. The Facebook page, "Royal Canadian Navy Today and Yesterday" posted the image below, identifying it as "proposed new naval combat design".  The NCD's are being revised again?

Six-minute "trailer" video stiched together from all released footage so far: Per the site, "We have taken every scene from every Teaser Trailer, Trailer, Behinds The Scenes, On The Set, Featurette, Online Spot and TV Spot and put every clip in order as how we believe the movie will play out."...

That would depend on where the particular J.D. Irving corporation and the particular shareholder are resident.  It looks like there are multiple related corporations. I can assure you that the courts here do take fiduciary duty very seriously, where such duties exist under Canadian law. 

I feel compelled to point out that this is not a correct statement of the law with respect to fiduciary duties, at least in Canada.  I do hear statements from people from time to time, that "the company owes a fiduciary duty to its shareholders" or, more commonly, that "the directors of a...