Search results

Well if you want to be like that...  ::) It's safe to assume that Not every applicant to the CF uses this website.

Motard, It's safe to assume that not every applicant to the CF uses this website. In other words, you're not going to hear about every ROTP offer.

You don't need experience to go on forces.ca and find out for yourself. If there's a prerequisite for the job you want, you'll find out there. http://www.forces.ca/en/JobExplorer/BrowseJobs-70

I'm assuming that this is directed towards me. If it is, and the information I posted was incorrect, feel free to point it out.

http://www.joedrouin.com/items.php?l=en&nbTypeItemID=34&nbCatID=8 There are a couple of plaques but I couldn't find any trophies listed on this site. However, Mr. Drouin would most likely be the best man to contact for the appropriate information.

Back in 2005 the minimum for V3 went from 6/120 to 6/60. If his vision is worse than your's and he were to enroll now, he would most likely be classified as a V4. The medical staff must enforce a standard, so it doesn't depend on the individual. If your acuity falls within a certain range, you...

It seems that you don't understand that the "honest opinions" of milnet.ca users does not matter at all. All that matters is the opinion of whichever medical officer will be looking over your medical file. Everyone on this site can tell you that your chances of getting in are incredible and that...

It's still very possible, even if there aren't many (or any) enrolled in ROTP.

I don't know the exact number, but I know that very few have completed it. Basically, the only people that would have done BMOQ are those who have been in the reserves as Officer Cadets then put in for a CT.

If she's your legal guardian, then the answer is yes. Otherwise, you're out of luck.

http://www.forces.ca/en/page/applynow-100 There is NO "way around this." The rules are there for a reason. As for starting the application process, the most you could do is fill out the form yourself. The recruiter will not accept it until you have a parental/guardian signature.

And the original: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2331177

What's the point of even having name tags and ranks on the uniform if nobody can even see them? I'm pretty sure their not changing them just so that more salutes can be thrown around.

I don't now what the "pass/fail" mark is for every trade (and I can assume that very few on this site do), but like I stated before, if you fail any of the three parts on the test, you fail the entire test.

No, you can't fail any segment of the CFAT and pass overall. If it wasn't important, they wouldn't put it on the test.

The new tunic looks as if it's a mandarin collar that's been folded down like the traditional one.

I'm not sure about applicants, but at Kingston, roughly 20% of the Officer Cadets are Francophones (as of October 2011).

Now you're just being stubborn and trying to convince yourself that your crime is insignificant. There's quite a difference between speeding and driving under the influence. If there wasn't, the consequences would be the same. For the record, speeding isn't even a criminal offense (unless your...

Or perhaps the person who never had to "learn the hard way" already knew better.  ::) As far as the CF (or any employer) is concerned, they don't care if you are "statistically [less] likely" to re-offend. What they care about is that you have a criminal past, whereas other applicants don't.